grumpasaurusrex

joined 2 years ago
[–] grumpasaurusrex@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

No one rejected them! Although I can't confirm whether everyone ate them lol. None of my neighbors reciprocate with baked goods, so can't comment on that, but I am satisfied with the trade even just for good will for me and my barky dog.

But I can confirm that I have baked for years, and have passed out enough goods around the building that no one has cause to mistrust me. I definitely wouldn't have gone this route if I wasn't a competent baker.

[–] grumpasaurusrex@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Personally I love to bake, so when I first moved into my current apartment I made a bunch of small coffee cakes and just cold knocked on the doors of all my neighbors one evening. Some folks weren't home, but for the people I did meet it broke the ice and set us up to chat more when we ran into each other in the hall. And I was lucky enough to even make 3 good friends who I trade pet/plant care and favors with!

This exercise also quickly identified some people that I would not be friends with and that was valuable too.

[–] grumpasaurusrex@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

I actually have a related question that I'm curious to hear takes on. I'm a leftist, and I own a 1-bed apartment where two good friends of mine rent the apartment right next door. Their landlord is planning to sell next year, and they don't have the ability to buy it. So depending on who does buy the place, my friends could be out of a home. My sister and I could combine finances to buy their unit (with a mortgage), and ensure that my friends could stay where they are. This would be a bit of a financial burden but doable, and we would need to charge rent to pay back the mortgage.

Would this be a net good or a net evil? I feel very conflicted about potentially being a landlord (especially for friends) but also don't want them to need to move.

[–] grumpasaurusrex@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Changing your legal gender is not what makes someone trans. There are tons of trans folks that never change their legal gender for lots of different reasons, even if they're theoretically able to. It's just one of the steps that trans folks might take, and not typically an early step, but it's by no means a binary that defines whether someone is trans or not.

 
[–] grumpasaurusrex@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

I love how women "often" dying in childbirth is the ideal situation

[–] grumpasaurusrex@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] grumpasaurusrex@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

The way this man goes from maniacally driven to bring the monster to life to immediately swooning with disgust and horror once he succeeded is wild. He truly refused to think about the consequences of his actions. Victor Frankenstein is a shortsighted coward. Justice for the wretch!

[–] grumpasaurusrex@lemmy.world 35 points 7 months ago

Per the article 'Four of the detained Americans have admitted they brought the ammunition — but by mistake.'