gerikson

joined 2 years ago
[–] gerikson@awful.systems 11 points 2 months ago

That's a terrifying story. I'm happy it seems to have worked out ok.

[–] gerikson@awful.systems 9 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I'm not familiar with Character.ai. Is their business model that they take famous fictional characters, force feed their dialog into LLMs, then offer these LLMs as personalized chatbots?

[–] gerikson@awful.systems 14 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The way things are going, KnowYourMeme will be the only reputable journalistic outlet in a few years.

[–] gerikson@awful.systems 13 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Now construct the rest of the fucking androwl

[–] gerikson@awful.systems 5 points 2 months ago

A fertility doctor here in Sweden took sperm from men who were undergoing investigations for infertiliy and used it as donor sperm.

Imagine their surprise when decades later they found out they had kids.

Not sure why he chose those particular samples, maybe all he had available.

[–] gerikson@awful.systems 6 points 2 months ago

Trump has absolutely no principles or beliefs other than those that profit him.

[–] gerikson@awful.systems 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

how about we aim for no eugenics, not just the least objectionable sort

[–] gerikson@awful.systems 8 points 2 months ago

Dude is about 3 years too late but I guess it's always 8 o'clock in the outrage store.

For reference, HN went wild on this submission from a pretty obvious 4chan troll (the self-described "Black developer" just so happened to include references to a Stormfront post (since removed)):

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26487854

[–] gerikson@awful.systems 12 points 2 months ago

I thinkt it's pretty well-lknown that Spotify got all its initial music from Oink. They moved fast, got dominant, and were able to present the record labels with a big audience prepared to pay for streaming music. The labels quickly ensured they'd get the lion's share of that revenue.

OpenAI and friends tried the same thing - scrape everything, build AGI, reap the rewards. Except it didn't work, and they're in a much worse position morally. Even if they can get a judgement that what they're doing is legal, it will cost them a lot in litigation fees, coupled with the public perception that these culture vampires are ripping off the poor honest author. Not a good place to be in.

[–] gerikson@awful.systems 19 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (5 children)

The Bookseller: Penguin Random House underscores copyright protection in AI rebuff

Penguin Random House (PRH) has amended its copyright wording across all imprints globally, confirming it will appear “in imprint pages across our markets”. The new wording states: “No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any manner for the purpose of training artificial intelligence technologies or systems”, and will be included in all new titles and any backlist titles that are reprinted.

Now that the content mafia has realized GenAI isn't gonna let them get rid of all the expensive and troublesome human talent. it's time to give Big AI a wedgie.

[–] gerikson@awful.systems 14 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Forget Gladwell

All nonfiction writers can end up writing incorrect or controversial things, but why does every Gladwell book push half-formed and inaccurate theories? For years, my loose feeling about Gladwell was that he writes like someone who doesn’t care about being correct, which is not a way I would describe any other author I've encountered. There is something uniquely odd about his work.

view more: ‹ prev next ›