ericjmorey

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] ericjmorey 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Did we not get 1.1 million new users on Discuss Online?

[–] ericjmorey 1 points 1 day ago

23% of the US population chose this and the rest of us are suffering from their cruelty.

[–] ericjmorey 2 points 1 day ago

The party of law and order hates laws and orders.

[–] ericjmorey 1 points 2 days ago

Thanks for the link.

[–] ericjmorey 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Why not promote piefed?

[–] ericjmorey 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ceasefire being announced vs ceasefire being agreed to seem to be separate events here. If there are more attacks after the agreement is officially made, you'll have been proven correct.

[–] ericjmorey 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

People here are satisfied with using the ActivityPub services and content with slow growth of a now sustainable but relatively small user group.

The people who want to use bsky just want a better Twitter. And bsky has delivered that. If that's temporary, it's better for them to use it while it lasts because Mastodon is absolutely not what those people using bsky want. Mastodon to them is technically worse than Twitter but something they may settle for if bsky wasn't an option.

[–] ericjmorey 11 points 1 week ago

How do you obtain materials for knitting? Your choice is political.

Why did you choose to participate in !crochet@lemmy.ca? That was a political choice.

[–] ericjmorey 47 points 1 week ago (17 children)

Unfortunately everything is inherently political, but I can see the value of an instance that favors mainstream low controversial content.

[–] ericjmorey 2 points 1 week ago

Federation and decentralization is not what the users of bsky want. It's (for some) a nice to have thing but way down on the list of what they value.

[–] ericjmorey 2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Were you able to implement it?

 

This is the first time I'm seeing a way to host a full Bluesky network, I think. It seems like a big step towards full federation beyond appviews and personal data servers.

3
ATC Hiker Photo Archive (athikerpictures.org)
submitted 4 months ago by ericjmorey to c/eric_posts_urls
 

September 25, 2017
Marc Hogan writes:

Hit-making songwriters and producers reveal the ways they are tailoring tracks to fit a musical landscape dominated by streaming.

Throughout the history of recorded music, formats have helped shape what we hear. Our ideas about how long a single should be date back to what could fit on a 45 RPM 7" vinyl record. AM radio meant mono recordings, rather than stereo, and producer Phil Spector’s Wall of Sound—with its cavernous echo and massed instruments—was built for it, offering plenty of depth through a single speaker. Video killed the radio star. Ringtones birthed the quick-hit digital chirps of snap music. The requirements for American Top 40 FM radio, in particular, grew so byzantine by the early 2010s, when blaring, mathematically precise hits reigned supreme, that an industrial-strength supply chain of super-producers and songwriters emerged to fulfill them.

And now, streaming’s promise for listeners is also a gauntlet thrown down for creators. With tens of millions of songs just a few taps away, artists must compete or be skipped. The unprecedented wealth of data that streaming services use to curate their increasingly influential playlists gives the industry real-time feedback on what’s working, but this instant data-fication in turn risks feeding back on itself. While streaming has undoubtedly coincided with a shift in the pop charts away from the caffeinated bravado of several years ago, streaming-era hits appear to be as rigidly defined and formulaic as ever—if not more so.

Read Uncovering How Streaming Is Changing the Sound of Pop

view more: next ›