yeah, this sounds like a concession to the industry
I'm referring specifically to this where they could only put in a shaky bodge.
When you don't know an example, consider looking it up and not just waffling anyway.
a friend says:
effectively they made machine learning look like an Ising model, and you honestly have no idea how much theoretical physicists fucking love it when things turn out to be the Ising model
does that match your experience? if so i'll quote that
yeah, takes from physicists i know range from "wtf" to "it's plaaausible with a streeetch"
looking through the committee, I see Ulf Danielsson is notable on AI mostly for being skeptical (he writes pop sci books so people ask him about all manner of shit)
I do not, but apparently it is so
i wouldn't want to sound like I'm running down Hinton's work on neural networks, it's the foundational tool of much of what's called "AI", certainly of ML
but uh, it's comp sci which is applied mathematics
how does this rate a physics Nobel??
Are you sure that meets the letter of the law? GDPR would say "fuck that version of nuance, fix it." Microsoft now tries filtering on Bing Copilot in Germany, to variable results. What does the relevant California law say and mean?
8% getting up and leaving is not an indicator of health
esp when Matt was chasing some of them after desperate to get them to un-resign lol
2 BIBLE 2 AI JESUS, TAKE THE WHEEL
please write the full version of this for AO3 immediately
efficient move, getting the Nobel disease in before the Nobel itself