I doubt that any card can effect any player. I am yet to see a spell that causes any player into being.
Why not just call them 'carbon indulgencies'?
Dungeon Keeper seems fine, albeit overrated.
The reason I did mention him, though, is that he is the main creator of 'Curiosity: what's inside the cube?'
spoiler
Nf7 Kg8
Nh6
Then, either
1.
... Kh8
Qg8 Rxg8
Nf7
Smothered checkmate.
Or
2.
... Kf8
Qf7
Let's see if I was correct.
EDIT: Seems like I solved this one correctly.
Ceaserael 
Whatcha think's inside? Think it's like a Wonder Ball?!
NATO. It's just NATO inside. And Peter Molyneux.
Haha. So, you expect him to suddenly do a 180 and completely change his policies and selection of allies?
My 'hot' take is that your unsubstantiated assertion is contradicted by Putin's history. He was on the anti-communist side in the 90s, he has been against any sort of return to a planned economy throughout his terms, he has been in favour of stuff like monetisation of welfare, etc.
It's extremely silly to assert that he wants to 'bring back his glorious USSR' when his actions directly contradict that.
wants to bring back his glorious USSR
HAHAHAHA.
Meanwhile Dump literally talks about killing people in the street
Meanwhile, Harris has been doing that throughout her career and also promises to do more of that.
...Or, more rigorously, non-correlation does not imply independence.
As this little guy and everybody else knows, one of the most famous correlation coefficients out there is Pearson's correlation coefficient: cor(ξ, η) = (E[(ξ-E[ξ])(η-E[η])])/sqrt(D[ξ]D[η]), where E[x] is the mathematical expectation of random variable x, D[x] is the dispersion of random variable x, and sqrt(x) is the (prime) square root of x.
As we all know, if cor(ξ, η) != 0, then ξ and η are not independent random variables. But recently, this little guy heard that it does not follow from cor(ξ, η) = 0 that ξ and η are independent. Obviously, he craves the light of knowledge and wants to hear some examples of non-independent random variables having a correlation coefficient of 0.
This little guy craves the light of knowledge and wants to know why 0.999... = 1. He wants rigour, but he does accept proofs starting with any sort of premise.
Enlighten him.
Can we allow uncontrolled numbers from coming into the us? No
Why not?
Take this, comrade: 元