No, you're thinking about a different scenario. What matters is not if you are black, but if you are the target of the word you are comparing to the n-word.

She, as an obese person herself, proposed that "obese" is equivalent to the n-word. She didn't censor her word the same way a black person doesn't have to censor the n-word. That's not a contradiction. It would be, if she wasn't obese.

Not that I care about the actual point, just wanted to talk about the logic. My bad, if my assumption that she is obese, is wrong.

OpenSüß

#1 If someone has the macho habbit of not feeling in need of documentation, they need to unlearn it.

I use mainly fish and occasionally nushell.

If the workflow at a workplace requires a consistent experience across all PCs...why doesn't that workplace enforce that consistency?

I understand your frustrations, but corporate or organizational needs should not technically limit the personal needs of using a personal computer.

(And when people, used to a strict environment, are overwhelmed by the amount of freedom in their new environment, I think it's better to guide them through the options instead of just taking away everyone's freedom)

There are cases where this applies, when a significant issue is censored across all media and you can only reach the rest of the people with greater power to resist the oppressors.

In most cases, it doesn't. We have somehow normalized the assumption that people will listen more to protests. But do you really? Don't reduce it to issues you already pay attention to. Think from the perspective of the uninformed target people. Think of political ideas you don't tolerate. Will you listen more to them, if they block your way, ruin your day and may even harm your life instead of having a conversation with you?

I know people mean it well and I respect that. But it's a little indirect insult, when their first reaction is to assume that you feel bad about it and to patronize you.

Of course there are people with that mindset among short dating men who often aggressively blame women's standards. So I try to be not too upset about it.

#1 finds ways to not give you a solution despite having one. #2 finds ways to give you a solution despite not having any.

What disrupted the fun for me:

• the rules for articles before languages, countries and their people
• everything sounds the same / easy to be misunderstood
• not nearly as internationally approachable as it could be, though obviously that's almost impossible

I haven't seen any negative criticism on chillicheescript here.

In my opinion taking your time to find the Linux distribution you like the most, is not only a great learning experience, but also allows you to learn more about your own preferences.

Food