Nalivai

joined 1 year ago
[–] Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

There is nothing in the rules as written that prevents it
Edit: forgot i am not in the dnd community

[–] Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Where the fuck have you found whatever weird esoteric distribs you are talking about, and why on earth did you went with those? Depending on the answer to the question, I kind of understand how you managed to make Arch "perform poorly" whatever that means in that regard, you need to have at least basic understanding to use Arch (or treat it as an opportunity to learn).
But you don't start your experiments with something from third page of Google, at that point you're an alpha tester.

[–] Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 11 months ago

I wasn't saying that we have everything available for Linux. Not yet, anyway. I was saying that whatever we have there is usually free and very customisable.
People committing from Windows and especially Mac infrastructure think that since they spent hundreds of dollars on software they use, they will have to do that again if they will swith to Linux. For a lot of people the thought of free software just never crossing the mind

[–] Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 11 months ago (5 children)

I think you are talking about the situation that might be true 15 years ago, vut right now you'll be hardpressed to find anything that doesn't work out of the box on any modern distribution. I don't know what plugins and dependancies don't work on your machine, but I assure you it's not a universal experience, far from it.
Also, most of the software that you use on Linux is free, so you don't "buy" new couch if your old is built specifically for your old house, you learn to sit on any of the new ones that you can get for free at any moment

[–] Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 11 months ago

That's how politics generally works, you push for the issue for decades and if you're relentless enough you either finally push through it or you die. You also can and probably need to do all other things but you never stop pushing.

[–] Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Nothing. He just used it here with angry intent and he should've removed it. And not change for non-sweary anger, if that isn't clear

[–] Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Oh yeah, when your boss has anger issues and curses you in email, you really want to politely talk to him and ask him to stop. That will show them that you're a little spineless sucker and can be shat on indefinitely.

[–] Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Yep. In this email it is done using them though.

[–] Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 11 months ago

The society would be better if we collectively eat everyone who is hoarding money above some level. Physically, literally, eat them, with mustard and mayo.
But since that probably isn't happening anytime soon, we have to make them stop playing their stupid fucking games with things that humans need to survive, like, for example, housing. Let them buy and sell and invest and shortly squeeze to the moon whatever bullshit people don't use, yachts for example. But when they do it with real life stuff it's harmful for the humanity

[–] Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 11 months ago

Everything is only exist in its own context. But I even clarified that we're talking about US (if it wasn't obvious by the fact that we're talk about US politicians)

[–] Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

They kept pushing it as an issue they care about, and eventually they got through. If they didn't, they wouldn't.

[–] Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

You just read how Bernie (as lefty as they come in US) is opposing giving missiles to Israel, what the fuck are you talking about?

view more: ‹ prev next ›