MarcRnt

joined 2 years ago
[–] MarcRnt@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

Five soldiers of specialized anti terrorism forces battle against some other five soldiers of those same forces, to defuse a bomb. But for some reason all of these operators are from the same countries and task forces and should actually work together. Also the servers of this game are shit.

[–] MarcRnt@feddit.de 26 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I'm not upset in any way about Sync. It seems like a quality app with a different business model.

What I'm actually upset about is people claiming open source apps are shitty and only Sync is possible to provide a good experience. That's just pure bs

[–] MarcRnt@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

screen-20230804-024637_exported_6255

My homescreen is pretty basic, most important apps are on the start page, other stuff and games on the second page.

The wallpaper is animated and shows the current weather at my position. I uploaded a few seconds of the current animation to YouTube: https://youtube.com/shorts/W1_zyn-Pvvk

The app providing these wallpapers is called Breezy Weather and can be found on F-Droid (https://apt.izzysoft.de/fdroid/index/apk/org.breezyweather) or GitHub (https://github.com/breezy-weather/breezy-weather)

[–] MarcRnt@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm sorry to say, but you seem to be clueless in the world of software engineering. Open vs closed source does not make any software better or worse. This solely depends on the talent and will of the developers to create a good app for you. That can happen in both worlds, but just because an app is not open source doesn't make it better in any ways. Rethink it. Sync might be a nice client, but you're dependent on this one dev to always deliver a good experience and keep updating, whereas if it was open source,you could be sure someone would continue the work and help fix some issues if anything was to happen. Open source has a lot of potential. Don't let anyone fool you into thinking it's worse in any way. It's not.

view more: ‹ prev next ›