Jlafs

joined 1 year ago
[–] Jlafs@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Cause they're a firbolg

[–] Jlafs@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Nice censorship

[–] Jlafs@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Muskrat gunning to be the next CEO of EA or Unity? He's on the right track

[–] Jlafs@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

That's a bit of a stretch. Meat + salt rarely disappoints me

[–] Jlafs@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

You should try some Uniball Jetstreams

[–] Jlafs@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nah, Oreos are still a name brand, not a generic. Like cheese nips vs cheez its

[–] Jlafs@lemmy.world 51 points 1 year ago

Engineer: that glass has a 2x safety factor

 
[–] Jlafs@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Maybe they need the brains of their patients to have fewer wrinkles and have been playing 5D chess this whole time to ensure that happens

[–] Jlafs@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Nice! I grew up with this!

[–] Jlafs@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Your null hypothesis is the thing you're trying to disprove. For example, if I wanted to run a study to asses the effect of adding a certain growth hormone to a cell culture, my null hypothesis would be "there is no effect". In your case, it would be "there is no difference in how much different things are liked". From there, you'd run your study, and do your statistical analysis, for which there are different methods based on the type of data, number of groups your comparing, sample size, etc., and I'm not a statistician so I can't say which methods are best for what you're planning.

When it comes to p-value, to really simplify it, you can think of your p-value as the likelihood your null hypothesis is true. That's not exactly what it means, but it's an easy way to remember it.

[–] Jlafs@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Looks more like a tomahawk to me

[–] Jlafs@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

What's up with that "t"?

view more: next ›