Seriously. The recent story of just how many people have died from the cops 'giving them something to calm them down' is insane. If you're not my doctor, you don't get to dose me with anything.
IzzyScissor
I remember one time when my dad renewed his car's tags they misspelled his name on one of the forms and he only noticed after he was leaving.
It took another 30 minutes to sign paperwork confirming that (for example) 'Austin' and 'Austyn' are the same person, and that this was not intended to cause fraud. I can imagine someone seeing/experiencing that for the first time and thinking they found the perfect loophole.
I really hope he has a plan to stay safe and also has a document saved with multiple people in the event of an 'unforseen sudden death'.
He was staying at a hotel out-of-state while giving evidence against Boeing.
He was found dead in his car in the hotel parking lot from a 'self-inflicted wound'.
There's really no other way to look at it logically than he was murdered by Boeing. Nothing else adds up.
Fantastic news.
Anti-Hamas rage bait. Article ACTUALLY says "there are “reasonable grounds” to believe that Hamas committed rape and “sexualised torture” during its attack in southern Israel on 7 October."
From OCTOBER.
Israel murdered over a hundred people LAST WEEK who were starving and waiting in line for food and injured around 750 more, so why are we seeing an influx of articles making 'reasonable assumptions' against Hamas from 5 months ago? It still doesn't justify Israel's actions.
Oh, this happened in January before the whole Stephen King 'deadnaming' Twitter fiasco. I completely thought this was retaliatory at first.
Yeah, turns out moderating user generated content to guarantee it being safe for children is expensive.
I still want journalists to get definitive answers on things like, 'Who gets custody?' 'How much child support is necessary for an embryo?' 'If life begins at conception, does this mean an embryo frozen for 21 years that is implanted and born can drink alcohol from a baby bottle since they're technically 'of age'?'
There are so many STUPID repercussions from this ruling, and there's no logical explanation for it all. It's the beginning of the end of the separation of church and state.
36-3-301(a)(2): Persons receiving online ordinations may not solemnize the rite of matrimony.
They already thought of that.
Yeah.. almost like they're stuck in a cycle of poverty and can't save enough money for a down payment for a house either.
So 'funny'.
Never thought I would see the day where Google crumbles, but they're actively sprinting towards it now.