[-] Ath47@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

This is exactly right. But since it requires everyone to make a change all at once, it unfortunately can never happen in the US.

[-] Ath47@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Both, and only both. Never just one or the other.

[-] Ath47@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

That's the price of their previous model, and the article suggests that this one will be quite a bit more expensive. Definitely not a "projector beater" if you don't have around ten grand burning a hole in your pocket.

[-] Ath47@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Fair point. Though I believe we can still have capitalism without such extreme wealth distribution. Tax 99% of every dollar earned above 10 mil. Make it extremely hard to reach 100 mil. Think of how much good that tax money will do for society as a whole, assuming it's used properly.

[-] Ath47@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago

Yep. They are a glitch in the system. An exploitation. There's no way that any person should deserve a hundred thousand times more money than the average full time worker.

[-] Ath47@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Maybe writing assignments should be done in class, instead of at home. Anything you let students complete in their own time has always been open to cheating, via calculators, excessive help from parents, or straight up paying someone online to write it for you. This isn't really any different, albeit a bit faster and cheaper. You always need to stand behind a kid and watch them work if you want to be sure they're really doing it themselves.

[-] Ath47@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

This is frustrating because that picture looks absolutely nothing like an AI generated image. The judges are paranoid and suspicious because they keep hearing about the AI boogeyman, and apparently can't be bothered to ask a more knowledgeable person before passing judgement. Of course, image synthesis will reach this quality in the near future, so what are they going to do then?

[-] Ath47@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago

The shirt probably won't sell many units, but just wait until they release the pants.

[-] Ath47@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

True. They have a fair bit of leverage, though. Even just renaming the competing product would probably cost Meta a small fortune. I wouldn't mind being in that situation.

[-] Ath47@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

They wouldn't have a case, since this other app can prove they've been available under that name for 4 years. However, I bet the low-ball offers to buy the app and domain have already started. I wonder what number they'll eventually settle on...

[-] Ath47@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Same. The fact that Lemmy has several iOS apps also sealed the deal, as I do almost all my browsing on mobile. I made an account on KBin at the same time, and an eagerly watching both to see how they develop, but Lemmy just has more to offer right now.

[-] Ath47@lemmy.world 67 points 1 year ago

The Halfway Post is a satirical news site, so no, there is no evidence that Grindr said this or could actually do it. Still, it would be hilarious.

view more: next ›

Ath47

joined 1 year ago