this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2024
1326 points (98.0% liked)

The Onion

4487 readers
631 users here now

The Onion

A place to share and discuss stories from The Onion, Clickhole, and other satire.

Great Satire Writing:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com 209 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Kamala Harris was born October 20th, 1964.

Gen X starts at 1965 and Baby boomers end in 1964.

You were this close Gen X....

[–] metallic_z3r0@infosec.pub 171 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Joe Biden is too old to be a Boomer, technically. He's part of the Silent Generation. So really he's just doing the traditional Silent Generation part of bowing out so a Boomer can take over.

[–] sunzu@kbin.run 36 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Mark my word... Boomers will be way more savage.

They hate the poors and they hate young people outright. Policy will reflect this bias.

Younger ones feel like they didn't get their fair share since clowns like buffet etc are still running the regime. So once they finally get that power, get read for the fuckening

[–] darvocet@infosec.pub 39 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Boomers have been in control for a long time. They are dying now thankfully. Gen X is just now up and most of us aren’t dipshits…

[–] Kiosade@lemmy.ca 23 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Ehh I’d say quite a good amount of Gen X are like “Boomer-Lite” in how they act and live, if not full on Boomers. Especially the earlier half of the generation.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Yeah, we seem to have split into either "boomer-like" or "millennial-like" groups.

[–] sunzu@kbin.run 9 points 3 months ago

Boomers have been the public face of the regime ran by the silent generation owners and their crotch fruit.

It is changing now as tech daddies and other newer oligarchs are taking over, who are mostly boomer.

Gen X sold out in my personal experience at least the ones who got out of middle management. They act just like boomers, it is their turn to get paid.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago

They hate the poors and they hate young people outright

You're describing basic human psychology. There's nothing special about boomers in this regard.

I think it's weird that "hatred of the poor" has no convenient name, like "hatred of other races" or any number of other biases do. It's almost universal.

[–] ohmyiv@lemmy.world 71 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Not once have I, or any Gen Xer I know, said "Boy, I hope the next president is from my generation."

As far as my Xer family, friends, and coworkers go, we couldn't care less on which generation is elected as long as they aren't fucking things up even more.

[–] the_artic_one@programming.dev 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That's pretty fitting with Gen-X's reputation of being the generation that gave up on having influence on the state of the world. As a millennial constantly stressing about the impact I'm having on things, that sometimes sounds like a really sensible choice.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 14 points 3 months ago

That's the Gen X spirit! We need more of that these days.

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

My dad was born in the same year, falls under that category; but by all accounts he is far more like a gen X than a boomer since he early adopted computers, liked younger music, skateboarded, etc.. Things get blurry along the line.

That said, I doubt Kamala is cool like that... but probably not because she's a boomer, lol.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

The named generations stuff almost resembles astrology or a D&D alignment charts when you look at it under a certain light.

[–] Darkenfolk@dormi.zone 3 points 3 months ago

Sounds like something a millennial human warlock would say.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 3 months ago

There is definitely more in your birth cohort than in the positions of the constellations. People often point at X being the generation with a free outdoor youth, but computers and mobile phones in their late teens and/or adulthood. Millennials never had a time without internet, were often baby sat by iPads.

The earlier generations were defined by wars and the great depression, perhaps future generations will only be useful to demographers

Maybe there's no real meaning in generations beyond Millennials (the last group with a different digital life to the prior generation), at least until some major crisis or advance makes us point out the groups affected

[–] sudo42@lemmy.world 71 points 3 months ago (2 children)

UNPRECEDENTED

unpresidented

[–] kirbowo808@kbin.melroy.org 69 points 3 months ago

This straight up should be on not the onion at this point LMAOOOOO

[–] ansiz@lemmy.world 52 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Biden isn't a boomer, he's from the generation before, the silent generation.

[–] meliaesc@lemmy.world 31 points 3 months ago

When informed that he predated the Boomer generation by four years, Biden explained that taking a title away from a younger generation “is actually the most Boomer thing one could do, so it still counts!”

You should always read the article, even if it's satire.

[–] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 23 points 3 months ago

And he made place for an actual Boomer.

[–] uninvitedguest@lemmy.ca 11 points 3 months ago

When informed that he predated the Boomer generation by four years, Biden explained that taking a title away from a younger generation “is actually the most Boomer thing one could do, so it still counts!”

Kamala Harris was quick to assure ageing employees across America that she, while younger, was also technically a boomer.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 months ago

Kamala, OTOH, is a boomer. She was born in 1964, and generally the Boomer generation is defined as 1946-1964.

The generations of the presidents are interesting. Kennedy (1917), Johnson (1908), Nixon (1913), Ford (1913), Carter (1924), Reagan (1911) and Bush Sr. (1924) were all "greatest" generation presidents. Clinton (1946), Bush Jr. (1946), Obama (1961) and Trump (1946) were all Boomers. Biden was the first (and presumably last) silent generation president (1925-1945).

There's also a weird clustering of ages. Nixon and Ford were both 1913. Carter and Bush Senior were both 1924. Clinton, Bush Jr. and Trump were all 1946.

There has never been a Gen X president, and until Biden, never a silent generation president. If Kamala wins, it makes me wonder if Gen X is going to be skipped over the way Silent was. If she wins and serves 2 terms, she'll be out of office at 68 in 2032. The youngest possible Gen X candidate at that point will be 53, and maybe people will start skipping right to Millennials.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 3 points 3 months ago

I wish Trump was from the silent generation.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 51 points 3 months ago

This is how I find out. Wow.

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 18 points 3 months ago

Well, we certainly live in interesting times. Fucking hell.

[–] magic_lobster_party@kbin.run 16 points 3 months ago (4 children)

That someone younger is 59 years old

[–] DxK@lemmy.world 56 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Correct. Kamala Harris is 22 years younger than Joe Biden and 19 years younger than Donald Trump.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Nicoleism101@lemm.ee 13 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

I don’t really care about this nonsense boomer vs millennial talk. There are some terrible zillenials and awesome boomers, it’s very rigid thinking to say they are all bad.

Unproductive way of looking at things

[–] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It’s a joke. We all take so much generational shit from boomers a light knock like this is absolutely fair game.

[–] Nicoleism101@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

Idk maybe it was a light knock once but now it feels like a trench war based on flawed premise

However I cannot argue it can be fun to shit on iPad kids even it isn’t super fair

[–] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If you’re comfortable shitting on kids for wanting to be entertained and parents needing 5 minutes of sanity then yes you can handle this joke

[–] Nicoleism101@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I am super comfortable, chair with massage levels comfortable

[–] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 months ago

No you were just a judgmental person with no kids and a lack of imagination. Not every kid with an iPad is spoiled and/or has parents that offloaded the parenting to a screen.

It is wild how comfortable people are judging parents based off a myriad of assumptions all informed by like 4 seconds of seeing a kid.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 3 months ago

Lmao fantastic one

[–] JimmyBigSausage@lemm.ee 6 points 3 months ago
[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago

Haha, thank gunness this was written.

load more comments
view more: next ›