this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2023
76 points (74.4% liked)

Technology

59377 readers
4098 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rob_t_firefly@lemmy.world 70 points 1 year ago (13 children)

We have had legit flying cars for generations, they are called "helicopters" and most people can't afford or safely pilot one.

If you think the classic sci-fi "in the future we'll all be using flying cars and it'll be awesome" thing is a good idea, just try to realistically imagine how crappy life would be for us all if you and every idiot you fight with in traffic every day had a helicopter.

[–] knobbysideup@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

You can't drive a helicopter down the freeway. You can't land one just anywhere.

[–] snooggums@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can't with this car plane either, a runway that gives room for the wings and tail to extend AND to be out while moving forward up to speed or landing will be necessary.

[–] w2qw@aussie.zone 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The point is though it can travel on the ground to the airport.

[–] QHC@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So do cars and trains! They easily take people to the airport, where you can conveniently park your helicopter between uses.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Not with that attitude!

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 year ago

Why would flying cars be easier to land anywhere than a helicopter is? This is exactly why flying cars are impractical.

[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago

you can't land a helicopter just anywhere... so the solution to that is to "need a runway". I fail to follow the logic

[–] assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

And helicopters are loud AF. If you think motorcycles are annoyingly noisy imagine peak hour with helicopters.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] funchords@lemmy.sdf.org 46 points 1 year ago

This video has 7.6M views and was posted 2 years ago

[–] GnomeKat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 37 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Please just give us good public transport, busses, trains, please...

we dont and never have needed flying cars its a fucking dumb idea and always has been.

We're going to see more of this shit as wealth inequality continues to balloon. The old logic that money was made selling the most products to the most people is eroding, money is now either made extracting rent from normal people or selling prohibitively expensive status symbols to an elite class with so much money they can piss it away endlessly.

It's why the richest man in the world went from the man who sold the most things, to the man who sold the most prestigious cars, to the man who sells handbags.

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Lol, this video is 2 years old

[–] Geek_King@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sir, that is a car shaped aeroplane. Nothing about that is like the flying cars envisioned by the likes of The Jetsons.

[–] Tigbitties@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I thought the same thing until the wings got all tucked in there and it hit the highway. I mean, you can park it in your driveway. It still needs a runway but it's the closest I've seen. It's more of a plane that turns into a car.

[–] Geek_King@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The driving part isn't as important as being able to take off vertically. Needing a runway makes it the worlds only airplane you can drive to the airpoint to take off with, not as convenient as the flying cars we've been promised.

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Well, those are coming too.

They have flying prototypes and some key FAA approvals already.

Initial planned use is "air taxis" ala uber between skyscrapers, which tracks because uber was a big investor. Seems like a viable way to give more people a more affordable"helicopter" style around major urban areas at least.

[–] QHC@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How is either a better or more affordable option than a cheap helicopter? Air taxis using helicopter have existed for decades and fly around urban areas every single day.

Will people still need a pilot's license and all of the associated time + training that requires? Because they will surely also need to have a driver's license and insurance and everything else required of owning a car!

I do not understand the appeal at all unless it's just a refusal to give up on a very specific childhood nostalgia.

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

The idea is that this will be launching from landing pads in the city and will be publically accessable via a small hanger area. The trips are supposed to be mostly automated, with a human pilot for safety. The 6 props allow a lot more control in a simplier manner than a traditional helicopter.

It is supposed to be a lot cheaper, safer, and more accessible than helicopters, along with being way more of them available. Something akin to what dirigibles tried to do in the 1930s with building launchpads, but way more reliable and efficient.

The appeal is another type of transit, for now. The design as I understand it can also convert to "airplane" mode and fly for an hour or so at 200mph on battery power. I expect that if the air taxi service is safe and steady enough, these will be also be available for 200 mile flights without the irritation of standard air travel. Hell, they may sell them to people directly at some point.

I linked their website above if you want to do a deep dive.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

it's a plane. calling it a "flying car" doesn't change the fact it walks, talks and quacks like a plane

[–] FilthyShrooms@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not really though. Planes are not street legal, and this looks to be fine to drive on the highway once you land and fold up your wings

[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

there are cars (sports cars, for example) that aren't street legal. There are also street legal things that aren't cars (I don't consider a semi to be a "car", for example.

Being street legal is not what makes something a car.

[–] lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

It is distinguished by calling it a flying car. Or would you rather a rolling plane?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] QHC@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I will just never understand how so many people look at a broken down car on the side of the highway, then think "what if whatever happened to that vehicle was the same, but 5,000 feet in the air?"

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Cars and airplanes do not have the same maintenance requirements. An airplane has strict maintenance protocols that are needed regardless of if it is in-use or not. Critical maintenance items require sign-off by a specialized department. If the pilot doesn't have the proper maintenance logs and approvals then the plane gets grounded. Yeah sure, some idiot could circumvent that at a private airport, but obtaining a pilot's license is time consuming and expensive, and the vast majority of pilots take aviation regulations very seriously.

[–] QHC@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why would a different type of vehicle that also flies in the air not need to follow similar maintenance requirements?

The only reason cars and car drivers aren't held to the same standard is because if a car breaks, it just stops moving. If a plane, even just a single passenger one, stops working, it falls out of the sky.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] skymtf@pricefield.org 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Flying cars are danger to everyone, cars and driving suck enough! Please don't let this happen in our skies. What if someone wrecked one into my house and killed me.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

Imagine how much damage a deranged person could do with a flying car. Forget shooting up a gas station or school, just fly a car through it.

[–] angstylittlecatboy@reddthat.com 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Cool to watch, will and should never be a mass market product.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 9 points 1 year ago

Cars suck and flying cars will probably also suck. No thanks.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 8 points 1 year ago

Great. Let's move the traffic jam into the air.

[–] CookieJarObserver@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This shit is just useless.

[–] Dhrystone@artemis.camp 4 points 1 year ago

Kinda reminds me of Thunderbird 2.

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/watch?v=a2tDOYkFCYo

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

[–] Eonandahalf@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Doesn’t work. Just keeps loading. For me at least 🙃

[–] Terevos@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago
[–] Cataphract@lemmy.ko4abp.com 1 points 1 year ago

I saw someone else on another post the same, the piped videos have been working for me. I am on firefox desktop though not mobile or through a 3rd party app if that makes a difference.

I was expecting some sort of hovercar ...

[–] Poob@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] citrusface@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It literally turns into a car at the end of the video and drives out of the airport.

It's a flying car.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Thought the same then I skipped like half way through the video and saw the wings fold in and it drive around.

load more comments
view more: next ›