this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2023
305 points (97.5% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26804 readers
3017 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hughperman@mander.xyz 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Incorrect, there is no debate

Ethical relativity states that the goodness of dogs is absolute regardless of the frame of reference

[–] hernanca@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

There IS such thing as aether in the Theory of Moral Relativity: dogs.

[–] QueenCute@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

hm well I agree with you, but some people have a weird frame of reference that makes them imagine the concept of a "bad dog"

[–] HowShouldIKnow@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

"But with dogs, we do have "bad dog." Bad dog exists. "Bad dog! Bad dog! Stole a biscuit, bad dog!" The dog is saying, "Who are you to judge me? You human beings who’ve had genocide, war against people of different creeds, colors, religions, and I stole a biscuit?! Is that a crime? People of the world!" "Well, if you put it that way, I think you’ve got a point. Have another biscuit, sorry." Eddie Izzard, Glorious

[–] QueenCute@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago
[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

But what the dog is doing is it is generalising. That is a beginner's logical fallacy. It is suggesting that just because somebody else in a group that it perceives you to be in did something unjust, you carry responsibility for that injustice as well. Which does not hold. It is like blaming a German for the Holocaust. So the dog's argument is cunning, but inherently flawed.

[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

But what the dog is doing is it is generalising. That is a beginner's logical fallacy. It is suggesting that just because somebody else in a group that it perceives you to be in did something unjust, you carry responsibility for that injustice as well. Which does not hold. It is like blaming a German for the Holocaust. So the dog's argument is cunning, but inherently flawed.

[–] theoldgreymare@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This goes double for human good girls.

And somehow there's always so many more ways to be called "bad" than "good."

[–] QueenCute@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

for real! let's invent way to call good girls "good" 😤

load more comments
view more: next ›