Using AI to detect AI made content, what did they expect.
this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2024
73 points (97.4% liked)
Technology
1328 readers
112 users here now
Which posts fit here?
Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.
Rules
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original link
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may apply
If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.
Companion communities
!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip
Icon attribution | Banner attribution
founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
Regardless of the filters used in photographs, taking over a narrative like this is one of the oldest tricks in the book. If every photo has AI in it, then everyone is already complacent and should support the rich pushing more and more AI.
Easter totally isn't named after Ēostre, it's the day Jesus rose from the dead.
Generative Fill isn't a filter, the posters complaining about it were using AI tools to remove cars and other things from their photos and then getting butthurt when Adobe tattled on them in the meta data.
It wasn't a case of tweaking the LUTs or changing exposure, they manipulated the photos using an AI tool and got upset when they got tagged out for it.
...I don't think we disagree, and it doesn't really matter about the filter. All points valid.
That's not surprising when a lot of phone cameras use AI filters. They should probably have separate labels for photos generated by AI and photos edited with AI.
Just mark anything thats manipulated with Manipulated, anything generated as Generated and the rest would be OC
I can’t believe people still use metas ‘products’
Not a photo, but I had a 4K video that I shot on a DSLR and edited in Premiere that was tagged as "Made with AI" as soon as I uploaded it to the company Instagram. That video was entirely human made as far as I was aware, but I guess Facebook knows better.
Did you use any generative fill or any AI powered features?
Nope, I have an older version of Premiere and my DSLR is from 2016, so those features aren't even possible.