this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2024
270 points (97.5% liked)

World News

39019 readers
3735 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] not_that_guy05@lemmy.world 68 points 4 months ago (2 children)
[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 55 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, attacking a military unit seems like an act of war to me. Pretty blatant. Demonstrates that China only behaves as a bad actor with its neighbors, and can't be trusted to be anything other than a bully.

This is basically China daring the US to do something about it. We shouldn't take the dare, but we should respond with a show of support for the Philippines. China is flexing because they think the US is too busy with Ukraine, Israel, and the upcoming election.

[–] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 25 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, attacking a military unit seems like an act of war to me.

Civ 6 agrees with you.

[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 20 points 4 months ago

My ships are merely passing through (your hull)

[–] KaiReeve@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

Well, according to China, those waters are their territory, which means that the presence of foreign military vessels is an invasion.

Practically speaking, I think you could call that area a contested region, so minor skirmishes like this are expected and could escalate to war (like Crimea eventually did).

I think that the Philippines approach has been something like, 'You can claim those waters if you want, but you can't possibly keep us from entering them, so we're just going to ignore you until you start killing our people, and then we're gonna call in big brother America.'

[–] Beaver@lemmy.ca 68 points 4 months ago (2 children)

More of this will happen if the west doesn’t support Philippines or Ukraine Enough

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 14 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I was wondering how they "punctured" this military vessel, then I watched the video... They're fighting it out on freaking zodiacs.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 28 points 4 months ago (7 children)

The Chinese are pursuing a very weird passive aggressive strategy here that I do not at all understand.

"Surely if we spray water at the other boats and run our boats into them and jump on board the opposing ships with poking weapons like some kind of Maori tribesmen the rest of the world will get sick of it and go away and give us what we want i.e. full control of the South China Sea, without us having to actually start a war about it"

I really don't understand. I can't even say for sure it is a bad idea, because like I say I just don't understand, but it seems unlikely that it's going to produce the impact that they seem like they want it to produce.

[–] leaky_shower_thought@feddit.nl 22 points 4 months ago (1 children)

imo, I think they're playing the plausible deniability card.

They can always say they don't know what is happening in the lower ranks. Once the other side raises arms, suddenly they're going to play the self-defense card.

On the other side, they preach about how asians should support each other against the power and influences of the west.

[–] pycorax@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Ah yes, we're all Asians and Chinese, one whole family so we should support each other! Except if you disagree with us, fuck you then.

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 months ago

Also conveniently forgetting thousands of years of Chinese imperialism and Han chauvinism.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I only have two ideas:

They're seeing what they can get away with. Or, and more likely, normalizing more and more aggression in pursuit of seeing what they can get away with.

[–] N00dle@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

The tried and true Russia strategy. China learning well from neighbor.

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 12 points 4 months ago

Have you seen videos of the skirmishes at the Kashmiri border? It's absurd, like something out of a bad alternate history movie.

[–] xep@fedia.io 11 points 4 months ago

The impact as of right now is that everyone thinks they're being absolute assholes about it.

[–] the_kung_fu_emu@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It reminds me of this tradition. Especially this quote from a modern incident "Successfully counting coup disgraces your opponent. It’s a way of publicly shaming them. We believe that if you are shamed, you must admit defeat." It makes me wonder how much of the motivation for the incidents is internal consumption. Acting aggresively, but in a carefully crafted way to avoid an escalated response. The message sent internally that the other side restrains themselaee not out of reason, but fear.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Acting aggresively, but in a carefully crafted way to avoid an escalated response. The message sent internally that the other side restrains themselaee not out of reason, but fear.

That actually might be it. We can't look to people in our own government / own country like we're anything other than the boss and everyone knows it, but also, we definitely don't want to pick a massive fight with another nuclear armed power and our biggest trading partner for literally no reason at all. And so, let's play this stupid fighter-plane-chicken game with them and spin it at home like we're out there telling them what's what.

IDK if I buy it. It sorta makes sense.

It's hard to square that, though, with actually fucking up the sailors on Filipino ships in a way that seems like it should demand some kind of response. Maybe the orders were to just be pushy in a non-escalational way and things got out of hand on the ground in a way that for-real wasn't intended?

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Right, they’re pushing the boundaries as much as they can with plausible deniability, because they want the west to make the first move so they can point at it and go, “we were never hostile, they started it”

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 3 points 4 months ago

It's the "I'm not touching you" of international geopolitics. They're doing everything they can think of, short of actual war.

[–] bradboimler@startrek.website -2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Just waiting for them to try this with a US Navy Ship gonna be a bad day for the Chinese 😂

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 12 points 4 months ago

But they do this shit with the US too. Their fighter planes play the "I'm not touching you I'm not touching you" game with US aircraft right up until the point it turns into the "oh no I did touch you and now I'm dead and my airplane is falling apart in fiery chunks and your airplane is crippled what an exercise in futility that whole thing was" game.

Like I say, I won't even say that that didn't impact US policy in some way similar to what they wanted. I don't know that it did but I don't know that it didn't. Overall my main reaction is just wtf are you guys doing why is your strategy like this.

(I do of course suspect that they will not try to play the firehoses and spear wielding game with the US Navy. Just some similar version of the same type of tactics.)

[–] MyDogLovesMe@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Somehow this factors into taking over Taiwan.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 37 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

It factors into China's ambitions to control the entire South China Sea:

Straight-up imperialism. All your ocean are belong to us.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That "China/Taiwan" is just kinda thrown in there without even an asterisk or anything

(Actually I guess leaving Taiwan out of the legend entirely would have looked like an accident or something, and having a separate color for it would have been a huge deal and they'd have started to get phone calls, and so they just shrugged and put that down and said you know what it's not a perfect world let's move on)

[–] Aqarius@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

There's also that both PRC and ROC claim the area. IIRC, Taiwan actually claims three extra dashes.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 1 points 4 months ago

Bloody hell, you are right (well, sort of; apparently it's complex.) That's convenient for the map makers, I guess, although best of luck to them in enforcing any of it (and according to that article they've sort of clarified that that doesn't mean they're actually claiming the sea, as best as I can understand it.)

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 21 points 4 months ago

Anything China wants becomes "disputed" so they have an excuse to act like bullies.