this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2024
344 points (99.1% liked)

politics

19244 readers
1979 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] simplejack@lemmy.world 146 points 6 months ago (14 children)

I had to travel to Austin for work a few weeks ago. Got off the plane, checked into the hotel, took a shower, decided to use mother nature’s melatonin to help with the jet lag… then, boom. Upload your driver’s license.

So I had visited some sites that were hosted outside US and didn’t give a fuck about Texas’ stupid laws.

These laws are not only authoritarian, they’re fucking useless.

[–] Sasha@lemmy.blahaj.zone 61 points 6 months ago (4 children)

I assume this is the "small government" party doing this?

(I'm not an American)

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 28 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Republicans, which yeah. They like to talk about “small government” when it comes to billionaires and taxes, it really, that’s about it.

[–] RealFknNito@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

And guns. Can't forget the guns.

[–] TempleSquare@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yes. They want "small government" when the law affects them, but "law and order" when it punishes someone else who annoys them.

It's childishness we've come to be accustomed to, thanks to lead-brained 70-year-olds who are falling into legit cognitive decline... but still have the numbers to be a formidable opponent at the polls on election day.

Also, their dicks don't work anymore without a blue pill, so they may as well take away the consensual naked fun of Gen X, Millennial, and Gen Z (18+) people right?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ours@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Small so it can sneak into all their citizen's lives.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TempleSquare@lemmy.world 47 points 6 months ago (1 children)

What's worse: Reputable sites that comply with U.S. laws (such as participants being 18+ and filming of their own free will) are effectively forced out, while questionable site carry on.

The likelyhood of seeing abuse victims or underage in Texas goes up, not down.

If they truly cared about protecting minors, they'd see the flaw in their law and rectify it. Of course, we all know (not through cynicism but cold repeated behavior) that political conservatives do not care about minors and care far more about punishing consenting adults.

This law is a step toward the latter.

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 19 points 6 months ago

You: (bring facts and logic)

TX Republicans: "A witch! They're a witch! Burn them!"

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] foggy@lemmy.world 92 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

Honestly, this feels like a canary in a coalmine. A coalmine that we've known to be on fire, but a canary nonetheless.

12 states total. That's like a quarter of the country.

2025 is gonna be a wild ride..

[–] tmjaea@lemmy.world 51 points 6 months ago

Ironically their leader pays porn stars to have sex with him which obviously is not a problem for their voters.

[–] acetanilide@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago

Just imagine how angry everyone is going to be when they can't masturbate the pain of Present Day away

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Ok What is the canary wearing?

[–] Gerudo@lemm.ee 12 points 6 months ago

Oh step-canary!

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I believe it's just stuck in the dryer.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Allonzee@lemmy.world 59 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Enjoy that freedom!

Never lost that backwards, repressed, puritanical, "we come to the new world to be more dogmatic" prude streak.

[–] makeasnek@lemmy.ml 55 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Banning porn nationwide is part of Project 2025's plan. defeatproject2025.org

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemm.ee 5 points 6 months ago

Republicans plotting in the open to install an authoritarian theocracy? Sounds serious!

So when will democrats drop gun control considering this imminent threat?

Armed queers bash back.

SocialistRA.org

[–] AceSLS@ani.social 55 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] frunch@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Land of the VPN?

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 44 points 6 months ago

Conservatism / Religiosity is a plague that's been retarding our species since the dawn of man.

[–] WhatIsThePointAnyway@lemmy.world 42 points 6 months ago (6 children)

This is part one of the religious rights plan to go after porn sites and their patrons. Don’t give them your ID. If they get power, it will come back on you.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 41 points 6 months ago (5 children)

Funny thing is....do people think Pornhub is the only porn site on the internet or something? That if they make Pornhub shut down that all the porn will magically disappear? Fucking LOL. Sure, there's a good idea guys. It's not like there aren't a billion other porn sites on the internet that couldn't give a shit less about US age verification laws.

All this will do is drive people away from the most popular porn sites that at least have something in place even if it isn't very good and drive them to any number of other sites where they'll pick up all sorts of malware on their devices and probably finding even more of the porn-of-questionable-legality that these bills were meant to stifle in the first place.

Fire hot, water wet, teenagers are gonna find porn. It's embedded in their DNA. Don't believe me? Ask any teenager in the 80s about going into the woods to find a stash of porn magazines. We weren't told this shit. It's just like we...knew. Basic instinct. We somehow just knew there was porn in the woods and on scrambled cable TV channels at like 4 in the morning. Porn is eternal. And as long as it's out there, teenagers are going to find it.

[–] HaleHirsute@infosec.pub 17 points 6 months ago

Pornhub is just good about making news about them, raises their profile and perception as the main porn site.

[–] LowtierComputer@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It's not just pornhub. There are already a handful of others closing off service as well.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 22 points 6 months ago

And for each one of those, two that don't give a shit about age verification will pop up to take it's place. Pornhub could close today and it would be replaced with hubofporn and pornohubs dot com by lunchtime, hosted in some country like the Isle of Man or something.

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 months ago

Also, porn sites can just white label their UX/content kinda like how there's a million pirate Bay proxies

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dantheclamman@lemmy.world 40 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 19 points 6 months ago (1 children)

More of a stampede than a creep these days.

[–] dantheclamman@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yes, I worry we're entering the exponential curve, with the new effort to put ten commandments in schools

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cmoney@lemmy.world 34 points 6 months ago

Oh yes the same Republicans that want to save the children also want to marry them..

[–] Paraponera_clavata@lemmy.world 18 points 6 months ago (1 children)

A blog post from Pornhub said that its latest locations for shutdowns are Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky and Nebraska. The site said it would end operations in those states in July 2024. The website closed in Texas last week, and has also blocked access to its site in Arkansas, Mississippi, Montana, North Carolina, Utah, and Virginia in response to similar state legislation.

[–] 18_24_61_b_17_17_4@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'm not surprised to see any of those states on the list.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mercano@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago
[–] TheBigBrother@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago

Time to invest in VPN companies..

[–] BaronVonBort@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)

As far as they know I’m from the Netherlands.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago (3 children)

XVideos will get more popular.

[–] aniki@lemm.ee 12 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I just tested with my VPN and indeed xvideos doesn't give a shit if you're in Texas.

The A record for xvideos resolves to the Netherlands so that's probably why they don't give a shit.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] arin@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

vpn stonks go up

[–] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago (3 children)

So, I have a pretty alright VPN provider, but I've been looking for a self-hosted solution to allow me to say "Hey, if you're trying to hit www.domain.com, go through this VPN tunnel instead" but still run everything else straight through. Lots of options exist, I have one that would be perfect that we utilize at my company, but I haven't found a good solution that doesn't utilize enterprise level pricing.

Anyone got any tips on that front?

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Tinyproxy

https://github.com/tinyproxy/tinyproxy/releases

Free Open source Upstream Http/s, socks4/5, direct redirection per site/URL/domain with regex. Can set default upstream proxy for everything else.

Invisible proxy Reverse proxy

Command line / simple text config

It's in your distros repo

It's available in termux.

It works.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RazorsLedge@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago (3 children)

You can use foxyproxy (browser extension) with SOCKS5 proxies to ssh tunnels to various hosts based on the URL pattern. Maybe too kludgey for your use case.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›