[-] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world 129 points 2 weeks ago

(It’s Kamala if you don’t want to read it.)

I don't care what anyone says about you, you're awesome my friend.

[-] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world 37 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The talk around weight loss is kinda crazy and a lot of it is dominated by pseudoscience.

However, we are pretty much positive that eating at a calorie deficit will result in weight loss in 99.9% of cases and you aren't going to be the 0.1%. There's a lot of anecdotal data about how eating too little will make you stop losing weight or even gain more weight because of your 'metabolism', but no controlled studies that show that to be a significant contributor without other causes. It's not some magical metabolism trick, you're just cheating on your metrics and doing less because you're tired and cranky and have no energy because you aren't eating right.

Saying that, eating at a massive deficit can definitely make you feel like shit and will make it hard to exercise, do not recommend. You will also likely have a part of your brain dedicated to fantasizing about food 24/7 and your libido will likely be in the trash if that matters to you. This will be very hard to maintain, and you have to remember that there's never going to be a day where you can go back to eating like 'normal'. Your current normal is why you need to lose weight and your goal is to eventually establish a new baseline.

Lastly, highly recommend against adding calories back due to exercise. We don't have a lot of good data about there being any reliable indicators of actual calories burned available to the average person and you'll find a tremendous amount of super variable answers when you find instances where people tried to actually test the estimates you see online. The time you put into exercise isn't about weight loss, it will help, but it's a bonus just for you because you deserve to have the body that you want.

[-] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world 44 points 1 month ago

Rhymes don't matter if it's a polar bear.

[-] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world 40 points 2 months ago

I kinda feel like voice search is just an inherently bad platform for shopping.

Supposedly... Home & Kitchen is the most popular category on Amazon, consumer choice comes into that so rapidly that it's hard for it to make sense with just audio feedback or even a tiny screen like the show.

[-] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world 47 points 2 months ago

I would think the fact that they're silent indicates that they don't have a fix that they like.

If that's the case, I'd imagine they'd keep silent until that changes or they get sued.

[-] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world 93 points 2 months ago

Wow, republicans losing Texas, that would be a hell of a win if Colin could pull it off.

[-] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world 45 points 2 months ago

I do feel like we may have hit a time where the groups classifying CVEs are a bit desperate for numbers. It's really hard to tell the legitimate ones from the ones where it's like "If you had tiny gremlins with soldering irons living inside your PC, its possible they might be able to determine what year your computer thinks it is. The gremlins are assumed to have full domain admin access".

[-] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world 46 points 2 months ago

I'm not a fan of Andrew Tate, but we really got to lay off the hate on wife beaters. Tank tops are real comfy yall.

[-] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world 49 points 3 months ago

Alexa has a tendency to give you the 'featured' product no matter how precisely and specifically you ask her for something. Even if you don't have to research and know exactly what you want, it's almost always easier to just go find your phone.

The real game changer for Alexa was always having a voice assistant that you can integrate with just about whatever you want that isn't tied to someone's phone. The idea of going into someone's house and just saying 'Alexa, turn on the kitchen lights' or 'Alexa, is it cold outside?' is where the Alexa magic lies, but Amazon never could figure out how to make that profitable on it's own, just doesn't contribute to the business case.

[-] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world 66 points 3 months ago

But yes, what kind of unit is this?

How lifelong friendships are made.

[-] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world 59 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I definitely support that we've pushed this show out of the forefront, but this is where a lot of the arguments for the flag as a 'symbol of southern pride' come from. It's a weird argument, and it is definitely not a fair one, but there's very fond associations in the south with that car even from people who had no clue where the flag came from. Super successful attempt to help the confederate flag be seen as acceptable, whether on purpose or not.

It's a weird show too for someone who isn't from the south... Racial diversity is non-existent in the show, but that's also pretty accurate for its location... It had some awesome car scenes, but no depth. The only hot take in the show beyond the flag painted on top (which wasn't even a hot take then) was that the government was widely seen as corrupt and it was more than a bit sexist.

[-] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world 35 points 3 months ago

The goal isn't to give you stuff you want to watch, the goal is to do just enough that is just good enough to keep the highest amount of users subscribed. We like to think those are the same thing and they are usually aligned, but don't have to be. It's better for Netflix if you find those slower and just keep coming back to look around, kind of like some frustrating streaming gatcha game.

view more: next ›

BarbecueCowboy

joined 4 months ago