this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2023
480 points (98.2% liked)

Linux

48705 readers
1162 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

What use to be the PPA that allowed Ubuntu users to use native .deb packages for Firefox has recently changed to the same meta package that forces installation of Snap and the Firefox snap package.

I am having to remove the meta package, then re-uninstall the snap firefox, then re-uninstall Snap, then install pin the latest build I could get (firefox_116.0.3+build2-0ubuntu0.22.04.1~mt1_arm64.deb) to keep the native firefox build.

I'm so done with Ubuntu.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ebits21@lemmy.ca 138 points 1 year ago (25 children)

Yeah they’re all in on snaps. Vote with your distro choice.

[–] Hominine@lemonine.hominine.xyz 37 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What I don't get is why. What with the recent Red Hat debacle one would think Canonical would make a stronger case as opposed to force feeding the issue.

[–] Sneptaur@pawb.social 46 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Because it’s canonical’s thing they’re marketing to server markets

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] neutron@thelemmy.club 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm afraid they'll break off Debian one day. Supporting snap is one thing, sabotaging well established user cases (apt installing deb, not being a snap prozy) is another.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)
[–] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 85 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Imagine having to fight your OS to do what you want. True Windows experience.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] lvxferre@lemmy.ml 76 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

You know what, enough is enough. Snaps run like shit in my system (IDK/DC why), I hate companies forcing their shit down my throat, and I was planning a clean reinstall anyway from Ubuntu 20.04 to 22.04. Might as well use the opportunity to go back to Debian. Or Mint. Or Mint Debian Edition. Who knows.

Next on the news, Ubuntu ("humanity") gets renamed to Amasimba ("shit"). /s

[–] bigkahuna1986@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Feeling bold? Try MenuetOS, it even claims to have an http client.

[–] garam@lemmy.my.id 13 points 1 year ago

TempleOS and give it a try. The prophet Terry will be smilling from the Heaven TempleOS

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] sebsch@discuss.tchncs.de 51 points 1 year ago
[–] iopq@lemmy.world 46 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I warned you guys. "It's so easy, just do these three steps if you don't like snaps" but then later they tighten the vise

[–] wim@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah. I switched away from Ubuntu for all this crap.

I moved to Fedora for my laptop & desktop, and Debian for my home server. I'm considering switching everything to Debian eventually, but there's a couple dedicated repos that make using Fedora on my laptop much easier for now.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CaptainJack42@discuss.tchncs.de 45 points 1 year ago (5 children)

There's a simple reason why Mozilla/canonical does this and that is security fixes. Due to the difference in support cycles of Firefox and Ubuntu LTS versions fixes would have to be manually backported to the system Firefox version and newer versions won't run due to library dependencies. Snap solves all of that.

Don't get me wrong though, snap is still terrible, but other than flatpak or doing the work of backporting it's the only option to get security fixes to Ubuntu

[–] thalience@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Previous to the switch to snaps, Ubuntu was providing the latest version of Firefox built for each supported Ubuntu release. I'm sure this was more work, but the older system library version issue was not a blocker.

Edit: in fact, Mozilla still provides an apt repo with Firefox deb packages built for each supported Ubuntu release.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] aport@programming.dev 42 points 1 year ago

There are several high quality community run distributions which aren't beholden to corporate tools.

[–] Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (16 children)

Hot take: PPAs suck and snaps/flatpaks are better.

With PPAs, inevitably some repo that hasn’t been updated since 2015 causes dependency conflicts and you have to sit there and troubleshoot, or pick between the software you need and actually having an OS that’s not EOL. With snaps, you can keep your decade old dependencies all bundled up and still upgrade your system even if the package maintainer has abandoned it.

The issue people have with snaps isn't the containerization or the bundles, but the proprietary backend. There is no way to point the snaps at a different store other than the one canonical controls. Canonicals forcing snaps on people pisses a lot of people off because it's a blatant power grab, an attempt to get people dependent on something they have control over in a microsoft-esque move. Flatpaks and docker don't have that issue.

[–] beigeoat@110010.win 22 points 1 year ago

Hot take: it doesn't feel nice to have a change forced.

It should be the personal preference of the user to decide whether to use native or snap/flatpak. If native package manager decide to not support the package any longer it would be better to make user aware and stop maintaining app, than to install a snap package. This is a user's decision.

Also this can have far reaching consequences. Imagine you cannot use/install snaps on your machine due some reason, what now?

[–] Rambler@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 year ago

I tried so hard to embrace snaps and flatpak. I really did. But the snap service kept bogging down. Installs specifically of Firefox were ponderously slow to start up. And ultimately I ended up with regular installs, PPAs, snaps, and flatpaks all together with their own daemons, update paths, and quirks sucking up my system bandwidth and emotional resources. System was constantly slow. Felt like I was running Windows.

I flipped over to endeavours, really enjoying it. Feels like Ubuntu did in the earlier years. Great support community, lots of choice, but a straightforward path to just using your system if that's what you're there for. And the same computer runs a good 25% faster.

[–] narp@feddit.de 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Valid opinion and immutable distros like silverblue might be where the future is headed.

It's not the point though, I'm not going with a distro that tries to force their proprietary solution on me.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Linuturk@lemmy.onitato.com 27 points 1 year ago (18 children)

I like the approach Pop OS takes. Their software store lets you choose between deb or flatpak when you install software. I've had issues with flatpak versions of some software, and flipping to the deb package usually fixes it.

[–] thekerker@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fedora does the same thing where you can choose between RPM or Flatpak. The only flatpak package I've ever had problems with was OnlyOffice, and the issue was that the scaling was blown way out of proportions. Switching to the RPM version resolved that.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] Seltsamsel@feddit.de 26 points 1 year ago (3 children)

LibreWolf is a Firefox fork with features removed which we don't want (Telemetry, Pocket, ...) and a few (privacy) features enabled (which can be deactivated if they're too annoying). I didn't had any issues with Firefox extensions as well.

I'm currently using it on Debian and it runs smoothly. Recent Ubuntu versions are also supported and you can install them via your package manager, see here.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Zatujit@reddthat.com 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you don't embrace snaps just don't use Ubuntu.

[–] PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Hence me now moving off of it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Time to switch to Mint ( or Debian ). I have not like Ubuntu for a while but this forced match to snaps seems too much.

I use Arch myself. I have been considering trying Debian Stable with Distrobox / Arch. The stability of Debian with a totally current and massive package inventory ( thank you AUR ) sounds like perhaps the best of all worlds.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dagamant@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I stopped using Ubuntu because of snap a while ago. I tend to run Linux on older machines and flat packs tend to take much longer to load than native apps. I get that they have their purpose but I would prefer to choose to use rather than be forced. I’m currently trying out POP_OS! and it’s a welcome flavor of Ubuntu

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] hexloc@feddit.nl 22 points 1 year ago

yay! another company damaging itself!

[–] Frellwit@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I use the binary provided by Mozilla at https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/

I even wrote an installation script that takes care of it all. (For amd64, not arm64. I'm not sure if they provide a stand-alone arm build.)

[–] Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

TIL about desktop-file-edit.

I’ve been doing desktop files by hand for years.

My favorite thing about the Mozilla binary is that it auto updates just like Windows, as long as you have write permissions.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Infiltrated_ad8271@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm a bit confused to see that the hate falls entirely on ubuntu. Isn't the change in the ppa of mozillateam, ~~owned by mozilla~~?

Edit: It seems that mozillateam is actually ubuntu.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] milkjug@lemmy.wildfyre.dev 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Ubuntu was my first-ever training-wheels gateway to Linux. I started from 8.04 Hardy Heron, and it felt like such a counter-culture move back then and I wanted to be part of the 'cool' edgy goth kids that DGAF about the mainstream normies.

15 years later, I still daily-drive windows, but I have many linux boxes for various specialist use-cases, mainly for scripting or self-hosting services, and still have 22.04 server versions running here and there. But this will be my last version of Ubuntu, and the only reason its still there is because migrating them is going to be no fun.

The Ubuntu today feels like a completely different animal than when I started. My breaking point was the 'upgrade to pro' message on every apt run. I DON'T WANT TO SIGN UP FOR YET ANOTHER METERED ACCOUNT. I use Linux to escape all the mainstream commercialism and monetization once in a while when I'm up for it. Next thing I know, it starts popping up in Linux OS's and even terminals asking me to login with an account so that I can be monetized.

Don't get me wrong, I know people need to eat and companies need revenue streams to pay their staff. Linux was my occasional escape back to my engineering and tinkering roots, but corporatism is creeping in like what happens to all good things (eventually).

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Rhabuko@feddit.de 16 points 1 year ago (19 children)

Seems like Canonical wants to push snaps now really hard. I hope that Flathub soon implements its payment structure, before companies flock to the Canonical store.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] GustavoM@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Ubuntu being Ubloatu.

[–] sleepyTonia@programming.dev 13 points 1 year ago

Yeah… For years I already suggested anything good but Ubuntu to those interested in trying Linux, but now I'm going to directly tell them not to touch it. Sure, you've got lots of online discussions from the past 20-ish years of people teaching each other how to install PPAs for up-to-date versions of programs or drivers and that's sweet. But how about a distro where that stuff is just available out of the box and one that doesn't force you to use snaps as if they didn't cause issues left and right?

[–] mustkana@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They are mostly Mozilla members, not Ubuntu members, who are responsible for the PPA. Are you sure, that your complaints and grievances are directed to the right address? See here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Contacts

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] igorlogius@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yeah, snaps are garbage as long as canonical keeps the backend locked. Better to switch to a more userfriendly distro. If you want to stay in the deb ecosystem ... maybe go with something like Mint or Pop!_OS or debian (testing)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] maiskanzler@feddit.de 10 points 1 year ago (16 children)

I get that people don't like being forced, but otherwise I couldn't care less about Firefox snap vs deb. All problems I once had have been ironed out. On the contrary, I like sticking to the "recommended" path with more developer focus and hopefully higher stability. For my usecases I have zero problems with snap.

[–] PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 1 year ago

For one, the snap version is 115 instead of 116, so it's reverting me to an older version, which makes firefox want to wipe my profile. Not ok. Two, I was purposely using the Mozillateam PPA to get non snap installations, and they up and changed that on us with no warning. Then there is the matter that firefox as a snap is slower. And finally, I can't add the Widevine for arm64 plugin to the snap.

Snap for browsers is a terrible idea.

[–] thalience@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Smart card support is still completely broken. I kinda need that to use Linux for my work PC.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] picnic@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Well fuck snaps. Been using ubuntu for over 15 years and finally starting to move elsewhere, begrudgingly. Finally have had enough after latest lts release.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›