1112
submitted 1 year ago by tst123@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 202 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm not sacrificing shit, asshole. We fucking deserve a 4 day work week after decades of skyrocketing productivity and shit wages.

We've been sacrificing every time we get a "raise" or a "cost of living adjustment" that doesn't even come close to keeping up with inflation.

[-] _wintermute@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago

Productivity has been on a rocket to the moon since the beginning of the industrial revolution, so centuries.

Every time I see any discussion about a 4 day work week, it's always the same. Discussion is focused around what changes/sacrifices the workers are willing to make to accomplish this. Fuck that noise, nothing should be sacrificed. Your pay shouldn't change, your leaves shouldn't change, nothing should change. Fucking capitalist mentality bullshit.

[-] charles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 87 points 1 year ago

"Studies show productivity increases with 4-day/32h work week"

"Ok but we'll only pay for 32 hours."

"I literally just said it makes us more productive. Maybe you should pay us for 48 hours"

[-] Kahlenar@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

But you won't have suffered as much for it, so good you really earn it?

[-] irmoz@reddthat.com 13 points 1 year ago

I want to believe you're joking

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Not to mention a complete absence of service/retail voices.

The only way they could afford that is going to ten hours a day over 4 days- or the company has to increase their hourly wages to compensate.

But of course no one is actually advocating a 4 day for retail and service. It’s for office workers who want to go shopping on Friday too

[-] matt@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

I have worked in service/retail, and this argument doesn't make a lot of sense. Most service/retail is actually 7-day weeks, but the workers average out to 5-day weeks with rotating shifts etc.

All that would have to happen is the workers now average out to 4-day weeks, with a similar level of pay (which is what the 4-day week advocates are asking for).

The 4-day week isn't about office workers, it's about everyone.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jecht360@lemmy.world 98 points 1 year ago

No, no sacrifices are acceptable. Workers generally get taken advantage of in the US. I think everyone is tired of being taken advantage of. It's time for businesses to actually treat people better.

[-] _wintermute@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago

Yes, we are tired of being exploited.

[-] Wookie@artemis.camp 85 points 1 year ago

having fewer vacation days, 16%; having a longer commute, 12%; taking a pay cut, 10%; or taking a step back in their careers

Yeah right, what are employers sacrificing again? What a BS article

[-] LastYearsPumpkin@feddit.ch 57 points 1 year ago

Fewer vacation days? Heck no. If I wanted to burn vacation to get a 4 day week, I'd do it already.

Longer commute? Heck no. WFH or I walk.

Pay cut? Heck no. You KNOW that 99% of people will be just as productive with a 4 day work week as a 5 day, so why take less money for the same output?

Taking a step back in career? Not like I'm shooting for being a VP or anything, so I guess I don't care if I don't get promoted to senior middle manager meeting organizer, so who cares on that one.

[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If neoliberalism didn't completely decouple wages from productivity 50 years ago, workers would already be making the same wages for a ~3 day work week.

So yes, they can absolute go fuck themselves. The only way a realignment will occur is if workers organize, unionize, and demand it at a national level.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[-] query@lemm.ee 82 points 1 year ago

Fuck no, no sacrifices. Productivity is up, wealth is up, people should be paid more for their time and have more time to spare.

[-] UsernameIsTooLon@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago

Yea this article is painting that the people are the problem here. Sacrifice the super rich CEOs instead.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] problematicPanther@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago

My first sacrifice: the billionaire CEO

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Colour_me_triggered@lemm.ee 35 points 1 year ago

Working more than 3 days a week is barbaric and unnecessary.

[-] Rambi@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago

Working 4 days would be OK if it was only for 6 hours each day. Although 8 hours for 3 days a week would be better even if they're the same hours

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] IamSparticles@lemmy.zip 34 points 1 year ago

My team at work recently instituted a "flex time" Friday policy. Basically, as long as we're maintaining productivity we aren't expected to work on Fridays. A lot of us still work half days to keep up but it's nice to know that if I work a little more earlier in the week I can just take a three day weekend.

[-] travysh@lemm.ee 34 points 1 year ago

Ah interesting. I too have instituted a flex time Friday.

So far my company hasn't seemed to notice

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Phoenix3875@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago

The real problem is, how many politicians and capitalists are we willing to sacrifice before we get this 4-day mandate.

[-] WanderingCrow@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 year ago

That sounds like a solution, not a problem. I'm all for it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] 31337@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 year ago

A lot of U.S. factory jobs are 12 hour days, alternating between 4 day on, 3 days off, 3 days on, 4 days off. Probably not what most people are thinking of though.

My last cushy office job was 4.5 days/week about half the time (beginning of the quarter was 4.5 day weeks, end of quarter was 5 day week), and seemed to work well. Some stupid workaholic assholes would complain about the 4.5 day work weeks though.

In my experience, productivity per hour increases the less hours people work. Workaholics are just trying to stay away from their family, or don't know what to do with themselves in their free-time, IMO.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] MummifiedClient5000@feddit.dk 25 points 1 year ago

I'd sacrifice a couple of my daily hours of slacking off for a 4-day work week.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] barbedbeard@lemmy.one 24 points 1 year ago

81%? that's like... 4 out of 5 right?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] KTVX94@lemmy.myserv.one 20 points 1 year ago

This is not the way, it's better to work less hours per day than working more hours and fewer days. Productivity peaks at 6 hours, after that you're either less focused or just doing unproductive things. It's also gonna burn out harder.

[-] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago

What about less days and less hours ? That's just me (or is it?), but I'm always better and more enthusiastic at anything I do when that thing doesn't take up 80% of my awake time. I always solve problems when going back to them after a pause -always !

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] jemorgan@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

Yeah, totally respect your opinion, but I emphatically disagree with it. The goal of what’s being discussed here isn’t to maximize production for the sake of shareholders, it’s to maximize quality of life for employees. To that end, five six-hour days are worse than four 8-to-10-hour days.

If I start work at 8 and get off work at 2:30 or 3, I still can’t start my camping trip a day early, or spend the day at the water park with my kids. I still have to give up n x 10 hours of my life, where n is my commute time, assume I work in-office.

I would much rather work until 630 Monday through Thursday, and have an extra day where full-day activities are possible every week. That’s worth more to me than 10 extra hours per week of after-work time.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] giantofthenorth@lemm.ee 18 points 1 year ago

If they're willing to make sacrifices why not ~1-2 hours a week dedicated to unionizing their workplace

[-] Hyzerflip@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

I typically have a 3 1/2 day work week. I get paid on what I produce. I COULD produce more and get paid more but after over a decade I have leaned that it’s not worth it. The more I make, the more we spend to cover the absence of not being able to live our own lives.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] _number8_@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

am i allowed to say what i feel about the businessmen who perked up at the 'sacrifices' section without getting a TOS violation

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Kodama@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago

Would be great if 81% of my colleagues skipped one day, then i finally have one day with undisturbed focused work.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] LegionEris@feddit.nl 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I guess I'm actually a strong data point for the four day work week. I have never been psychologically stable on a five day work week. On every five day schedule, I shake myself apart. I end up suicidally anxious and depressed, have repeatedly considered inpatient treatment. I worked four days at my last job and work four at my current job. I was/am the highest performing employee at both of these jobs. I even enjoy the longer hours per day. I get the dip in productivity at hour 5-6 that people have mentioned in here, but I just need a break for lunch and caffeine to have another four or five hours outperforming my coworkers. It's that third day off that I need, the one in the middle that doesn't touch any workday. If I get that one untethered day, I show back up enthusiastic and ready to kick ass. It definitely helps that I genuinely love my industry and job overall (I work at a dispensary, which is very important to me) but that didn't stop my latest attempt at a five day work week from trying to kill me like all the others.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] EpicMuch@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

my work uses two different 4 day setups. we run 24/7/365 coverage. one shift is either 10 hour/day Sun-Weds or Weds-Sat, the other setup is a rolling 10 hour/day 4 days on, 4 days off. One gets you a consistent schedule, but you're regularly working a weekend day. The other is less consistent (work days cycle back around every few weeks) but you're for sure to get full weekends now and then.

[-] wieson@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago

I don't think cramming a 40h week into 4 days is what a 4 day work week wants to accomplish.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Coskii@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 year ago

I really need to go look up these work studies on the 32 hour work week. I fully believe that a 32 hour work week in an office setting may boost productivity.. But since I work in construction, a 32 hour work week doesn't seem like it would speed anything up on my end. The work generally just takes time. I can only measure, cut, attach, and repeat at a certain speed, and no amount of rest is going to speed that up.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] thatsnothowyoudoit@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Negotiated a 4 day work week at my current job.

It’s worth it, but it requires heavy self-moderation to do it at an organization where everyone is 5 days.

AMA.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] nutsack@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

how about a 0 day work week and i punch you in the face instead

[-] demlet@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

I want a four day work week and no sacrifices actually. I already barely make a living, what the hell else exactly am I supposed to give up?

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago

Go for it.

We all do better when we ALL do better

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2023
1112 points (98.4% liked)

News

22948 readers
5865 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS