65
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] grue@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

....And then they mostly couldn't be bothered to actually get college degrees despite how cheap they were, yet still ended up with good careers capable of supporting entire households with only one person working anyway.

Despite his cynicism, even Bernie manages to understate the problem here!

[-] wwaxwork@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Just throwing out there, this was one generation out of however many to the dawn of time that was able to do this. And they did it on the backs of the hundreds of thousands of people that fought, starved and died to get unions established. For the vast majority of history, if you could work you worked man, woman & child because if you didn't your family starved. Then people fought for generations to get unions established and they finally did it and one single generation got the advantages of it before the next generation decided they didn't need no stinking unions as they were working white collar jobs and here we are. We're not standing together so we're falling together.

[-] Smoothie_Criminal@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Hillary stole Bernie's nomination and robbed Americans of his presidency

[-] Drusas@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Hillary didn't rob him of it; the Democratic Party robbed him of it.

[-] Tigbitties@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago
[-] kokoapadoa@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Because of America's dogshit election system, she won the popular vote.

[-] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I'd give anything to go back in time and see how that election goes differently with an Approval Vote.

[-] justhach@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Honestly, a candidate like Trump was not an "if" but a "when".

Even if the Dems had won that election, history has shown they they would not have made any real.changes. They would have done nothing to try and prevent something like the Trump Presidency from happening. They wouldnt have tried to fix the rigged gerrymandered districts, they wouldn't have pushed for voting reform, they wouldn't have tried to call put the insane rhetoric being put out by right wing propaganda machines, and they wouldn't have instilled better checks and balances on the presidency that relied on more than the assumtions of common decency, respect, and tradition.

Nah, they would have rested on their laurels for electing the first female president, and be caught with their pants down when the GOP successfully harnessed the resentment of angry white men for being "under the rule" of a black muslim socialist for eight years, and a satanic pedophile child eating woman for 4.

[-] CallMeDuracell@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I wanted to believe this during the 2016 party primary like I needed to breathe. Hell, I STILL want to believe it. But the reality is that the American people robbed us of his presidency.

2016 was one of the first elections where Gen X, Gen Z, and Millennials collectively outvoted the boomers and the silent generation, by the slimmest of margins. It goes without saying how much the older generation drinks from of the neo-liberalism kool-aid. A self-professing socialist was always going to be a hard sell.

As far as the 2016 Democratic primary goes, Bernie got 1820 pledged (elected) and 45 unpledged (super/unelected) delegates. To win by one delegate, he would have needed to get 518 additional super delegates to overcome Hillary's pledged delegate lead over him. A win from him would have caused an outrage, since the unelected delegates would have overridden the elected (read: will) of the Democratic primary voters.

The most important thing American voters can do is to continue to demonstrably show how neo-liberal socio-economic politics is marching us to generational ruin to every voter you know, and then vote appropriately in every local, state, and federal election.

[-] Hypersapien@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It was the Democratic establishment and the corporate media that stole it. The biggest thing they fear is a candidate that puts the American people over corporate interests.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] BornVolcano@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Image Transcription: Twitter Post


Bernie Sanders, @BernieSanders

The Boomer generation needed just 306 hours of minimum wage work to pay for four years of public college. Millennials need 4,459.

The economy today is rigged against working people and young people. This is what we are going to change.


^I'm a human volunteer transcribing posts in a format compatible with screen readers, for blind and visually impaired users!^

[-] QRay@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Can we keep the timestamp in when cropping a post from another website?

[-] NOPper@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

7:29 AM · Apr 24, 2019 for the record.

[-] vitucadrus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Try researching your masters degree in a Library using Microfiche. First reply here on Lemmy, just wanted to say "hello"

[-] smac@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Sorry, Bernie's full of crap. He's deliberately twisting facts to misinform. He's using today's highest minimum wage to calculate paying tuition at levels of 50 years ago, and trying to imply that people only needed to work 306 hours THEN to pay for college tuition THEN. That's just not true.

When I was working during high school / college, minimum wage was $1.50 / hr. That works out to $459 for 4 years of college education. Tuition at public institutions in the mid '70's was $1210 / year nces.ed.gov That's $4840 for 4 years at a time when my comfortably middle-class father was earning ~ $25 K / year. It was cheaper, but not by as much as Bernie claims.

Also, public colleges have always been subsidized by the state. You'd also need to look at the level of subsidy between then and now and whether we're choosing to subsidize less.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mawkishdave@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Yes something needs to change and I feel you are seeing the real panic of the right as more and more younger people can now vote and are just pissed as everything they are doing.

[-] hydro033@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

People have been saying this since the 60s. Lots of young people are still conservative and many areas are still solidly red. I don't see a massive blue wave that garners a supermajority happening anytime soon.

[-] Kept7963@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Actually, it looks like this time it might be true.

Source

Next is speculation on my part, but I imagine people are turning conservative more based on their wealth than their age. We saw a correlation between age and conservative sentiment because people tended to gather wealth as they got older.

But that link has been progressively eroded, so people are no longer switching. Essentially the conservatives are killing the golden goose in their incessant pursuit of consolidating wealth.

[-] hydro033@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, I have seen that point and also a paper discussing it, but I am a bit skeptical. It could potentially just delayed... which transitions well into your speculative point:

Next is speculation on my part, but I imagine people are turning conservative more based on their wealth than their age. We saw a correlation between age and conservative sentiment because people tended to gather wealth as they got older.

That is a very good point because inequality is killing wealth accumulation. It's a very good working hypothesis imo.

[-] MiddleWeigh@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago
[-] electriccars@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

6 class days away from finishing my Associates Degree at community college. 😁

Halfway to Bachelor's.

[-] MiddleWeigh@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Congrats. That probably feels really good.

I never liked school. Authority, busy work, rote memorization. I always liked to learn ground up, with a purpose. And choosing what I wanted to be before i was even aware of myself felt limiting.

Perhaps I'll go someday, I could never afford to not work, but today, I think I'd be pretty decent at school..go figure.

tbh, I wouldn't trade my "education" for the world. If I could do it again, I'd do the same, i think.

[-] electriccars@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

I only started going when I was 28. I'm also a very independent learner, I was unschooled as a child, but I love it.

I'm the top student in most of my classes and I have straight As. It's nice to prove to myself I'm able to succeed in school when I didn't go when I was younger. You should give it a try, you might be surprised how much you actually enjoy it! I know I was.

[-] MiddleWeigh@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Perhaps I will get around to it. I do think I'd enjoy it, but for something I'd want to learn, not for a job. Tbh, the schedule would be what got me. I don't like em. I like flapping on the wind lol. I definitely understand your sense of pride in your accomplishment, you deserve it. (:

[-] Discoslugs@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Bernie sanders screaming into the wind yet again.

Bernie i love ya but nobody is gonna do the things you say.

They are way too reasonable.

[-] ItchySunItchyKnee@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Isn’t that kind of defeatist?

I don’t really have a horse in this race since I am not from the US.

[-] Furbag@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

It's more cynicism than defeatism. People from the United States have pushed for these kinds of common sense reforms for our entire lives and we still have nothing to show for it.

[-] speaker_hat@lemmy.one 0 points 1 year ago

I think the only solution to this problem is subsidies.

Subsidies knowledge works well around the world.

[-] aregularbeaneater@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

I think subsidies got us here in the first place. When the government pays for stuff it drives prices up.

[-] Vino@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Not easier, simpler.

[-] FinalBoy1975@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

This is very smart of him to use generational terminology to engage with young voters. He's looking at trends on social media. Maybe it will work for him. His main obstacle is that most democrats are moderate and don't have a problem voting republican if they think the democrat is too far to the left. Maybe engaging with young voters in this way can help him get over that obstacle.

[-] HiddenTower@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

That is what we are going to change

Then do it! I feel like I've heard this for so long, from all the parties, and just nothing gets done.

[-] cjsolx@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Do you realize who tweeted that? Because I feel like asking Bernie Sanders to just "do it" is very unfair. He's been fucking trying for the past decade.

[-] werds@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

I used to like Bernie , I think he talks a good game to get people in but can be counted on to take a dive.

[-] TrinityTek@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Take a dive, as in concede after losing the primary and supporting the Democratic nominee? That's exactly what he said he would do all along. It's a requirement to run as a Democrat in the primary and Bernie is a man of his word.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2023
65 points (98.5% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

9585 readers
1193 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS