this post was submitted on 13 May 2024
405 points (97.0% liked)

politics

19097 readers
3160 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 81 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (4 children)

So people shouldn't be upset that Biden hasn't done enough because he's not the king.

And then Democrats in the Senate who could investigate these things ask Biden because they're incapable of it.

So are we to assume that the entire government is incapable of dealing with this?

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 32 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

The prices legitimately went up due to supply chain constraints during the pandemic. The problem is, they never went back down, and then continued to follow the steep inflation trends of a post-pandemic nation. That all just became additional revenue for the food industry.

The last time a President signed an Executive Order to fix grocery prices, it blew up in Nixon’s face when it expired and prices blew well past what should have been a consistent inflation trend.

The only way the government could successfully address it would be through congressional legislation, by either establishing a legal rate of inflation for food products, or finally breaking up the big food monopolies. There’s just no way Republicans would ever go for any of it.

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 31 points 6 months ago (2 children)

He has done lots. People aren’t interested in positive news. Even if grocery prices drop in half, people will say he did nothing.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 19 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Okay but it would be nice to know if anyone our government is capable of doing anything about this.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago (1 children)

They're perfectly capable. About half just don't want to.

I don't know how to convince people to vote for ourselves instead of hate. I don't know how to get people to vote for solutions, even imperfect ones, over someone to blame.

But if you figure it out, these are the kinds of problems we can go about solving.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 months ago

half is being optimistic here though

[–] hark@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Grocery prices dropping by half would be amazing. I would be interested in learning what he has done for grocery prices and why congress feels the need to ask him to do something about it if he has supposedly done so much already.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago (2 children)

A White House spokesperson noted that the Administration does not play a role in or comment on enforcement actions but pointed to another example of Biden’s DOJ blocking a merger that would have raised prices for lettuce and packaged salads, and also suing to address price-fixing of chicken, pork, and turkey meats

The sheer balls to say there's nothing you can do because it's not your job...

And then immediately demand credit for something similar?

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 38 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I'm confused how you think it's similar. Do you have some source that claims the Biden administration instructed the DOJ to block that merger?

Cause what they are doing is pointing out how their independent DOJ has a track record of already investigating these occurances. They aren't demanding credit for directing them to do so.

[–] SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world 30 points 6 months ago (1 children)

We went over this when the last guy was in office. You don't want politicians deciding who the FBI investigates.