this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2023
578 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

60090 readers
3340 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 207 points 1 year ago (5 children)

My (unpopular?) solution is to make sure the rest of society isn't so desperate for food that they're willing to rob a robot.

In an unrelated suggestion, if youre in a grocery store and see someone stealing food, no you didn't.

[–] FredericChopin_@feddit.uk 79 points 1 year ago (8 children)

It really pissed me off how people don’t seem to realise that most crime is due to a failure of society and that if we give people prospects then crime will go down.

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Preach. Harsh penalties with no rehabilitation and an uncaring system with no safety net?

If you can't get a job and can't eat without a job, who wouldn't do crime?

[–] T156@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And in so doing, they have a criminal record that makes it harder to get jobs, leading to a vicious cycle where they're not employed due to a criminal record/recent imprisonment, and are forced to steal to survive, leading to another criminal record, etc.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] MostlyMute@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (5 children)

As someone who works in a grocery store, most of the people I see stealing are stealing stuff like makeup or drinks and junk food, not necessities. And our regular thieves spend hundreds on cigarettes a week, while still stealing whatever they want because they know they’ll get away with it.

[–] FredericChopin_@feddit.uk 13 points 1 year ago

If you think about it’s easier to steal higher value items that have a good resale value, rather than a complete food shop.

Sure, some people steal out of more than necessity, whether that be drug addiction (which should also be fixed at the root) or other issues.

The fact is quite simple that the more we give people prospects then the more crime will go down.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Zoldyck 109 points 1 year ago (13 children)

Fix poverty and you fix a huge amount of other things.

[–] chaorace@lemmy.sdf.org 79 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Ok sure, but have we considered arming the robots with assault rifles instead?

[–] thehatfox@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Arming autonomous robots, what could possibly go wrong?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Meruten@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 1 year ago (4 children)

The article mentioned tear gas canisters be equipped instead. I can't wait for a delivery robot to be near my property, someone tries to mess with it and gets gassed, then I get to enjoy tear gas as well from my front porch.

[–] nous@programming.dev 29 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Or some kid walks past it, bumps it slightly and gets gassed in the face.

[–] loom_in_essence@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Well the next kid will think twice about bumping the bot.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Heisme@lemmy.world 84 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Everyday we are one step closer to the plot of Demolition Man. I cannot wait to taste some boosted Taco Bell.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 80 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

"The robots are constantly monitored and equipped with 12 cameras and two-way audio communication systems. Any improper conduct will be detected immediately. If an incident does occur with a Starship robot, one of our robot rescuers can respond quickly," robot builder Starship Technologies says regarding robot safety, adding that acts of vandalism or theft are reported to authorities.

While that may be true in theory, instances of actual prosecution for theft from robots in cities where they operate have not been easy to discover. As with far more widespread instances of front porch package thieves or shoplifters, despite the volume of video evidence the robots can produce the police have to actually take some investigative steps to identify and locate the suspects

I'm glad they've thought this through.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 78 points 1 year ago (2 children)

the police have to actually take some investigative steps to identify and locate the suspects

cops give zero fucks when crimes effect everyday citizens.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Redditiscancer789@lemmy.world 80 points 1 year ago (21 children)

What a pathetic bunch of people trying to maintain the slave status quo in these comments. WHY are you fighting to maintain a world where people have to work low tier bull shit jobs to survive? The answer, you morons, is to let the robots be and improve society to the point technology said it would. We re the most productive we've ever been in our entire history yet work more than any other time in history. We need work reform, not a robot genocide.

[–] Sarsoar@lemmy.ca 34 points 1 year ago (5 children)

In an ideal world these robots would shift to there not being a need for "unskilled labor" and we would all have more leisure time. In the late stage capitalistic hellhole we are forced to live in, huge organization replace minimum wage jobs with robots and hoard profits and push people further unto poverty, while still overworking and underpaying the few people they do still employ.

If we had a ubi, then robots and self checkouts taking minimum wage jobs wouldn't be an issue because the person who's job was taken isn't just displaced and faces homelessness or death.

So I sympathize with the people who are complaining about the robots. As much as I want a scifi future with a bunch of automation, I want exploitation of the lower class to end first.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)
[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 57 points 1 year ago

some robots have been robbed of the goods they're delivering, including food.

That was easy to predict, wasn't it?

[–] metallic_substance@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

For me, this falls neatly into the "who fucking cares?" category. These things are deployed in very few cities overall and if the technology is ready for wide-release, you better have a more effective defense against theft than you already do if they are already being stolen from

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] unreachable@lemmy.my.id 29 points 1 year ago

modern crimes in modern times

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 29 points 1 year ago (10 children)

I'm far from a Luddite and I think robots in general are cool. But I kind of don't have an issue with people fucking up autonomous roaming robots. I haven't rationalized that opinion just yet, I guess. Just feels right.

Philly did nothing wrong

[–] chaircat@lemdro.id 24 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I don't think waving away being a Luddite just by saying so makes it so.

I can't think of a single angle of principled moral theory that makes this okay. Vandalizing or stealing someone else's property they paid for. Hurting both the restaurant and the customer by depriving them of their food. Holding back progress on an invention that can reduce the need for humans to engage in a type of work that is hard, dangerous at times, and low paid.

From a purely rational on paper view, it doesn't look terribly different than saying vandalizing or stealing from delivery vehicles driven by people isn't wrong. What possible justification could there be for this view besides Ludditism fuck robots?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Under captialism we lament robots taking our jobs, where under a better system we would be rejoicing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cyd@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (5 children)

You okay with people fucking up vending machines and ATMs too? Why or why not?

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

1 spray can of black paint vs 1000 robot cameras, who wins?

[–] Bigmodirty@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

When wasn’t it going to be a thing?

[–] InvertedParallax@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, this is a side of snow crash I didn't expect to see so soon.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ElBarto@lzrprt.sbs 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

At least we've moved on from killing them in the street.

Poor hitch-hiking bot.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] janus2@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

"you wouldn't -d̵o̵w̵n̵l̵o̵a̵d̵- drone-rob a pizza..."

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] sndmn@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'd figured the article would have some tips but I was disappointed.

[–] Followupquestion@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Choose your spot well, preferably near an alley without any cameras directly viewing it. Wear a no -branded hoodie, sunglasses, and a mask, then obstruct its forward path, and start spray painting the cameras. Wear gloves to avoid leaving fingerprints. If all else fails, a stun gun might be very helpful in disabling stubborn electronics.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] astropenguin5@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (4 children)

These things have been around for a few years on the college campus in my hometown, it's not that new and they do work fairly well. Might be that it was a testing ground though

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›