this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2023
578 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

60090 readers
3340 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] chaorace@lemmy.sdf.org 79 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Ok sure, but have we considered arming the robots with assault rifles instead?

[–] thehatfox@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Arming autonomous robots, what could possibly go wrong?

[–] Hupf@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] Meruten@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The article mentioned tear gas canisters be equipped instead. I can't wait for a delivery robot to be near my property, someone tries to mess with it and gets gassed, then I get to enjoy tear gas as well from my front porch.

[–] nous@programming.dev 29 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Or some kid walks past it, bumps it slightly and gets gassed in the face.

[–] loom_in_essence@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Well the next kid will think twice about bumping the bot.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm assuming the canisters would only be released if the door is forced open. I highly doubt it's going to activate a few slightly knock it I mean hell, those things drive into lamp posts on occasion.

[–] nous@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

With the care and attention tech companies give to the safety of their devices, I can definitely see it spraying someone unintended. Probably even the person it was delivering to. Any company sensible enough to properly implement this likely will finder better less potentially dangerous solutions to the problem. This idea stinks of someone who gave it 5 minutes of thought and wants it implemented as quickly as possible.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah but it's what they'll do.

[–] Plopp@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Tear gas infused hamburger, mmmmm. Cough cough.

[–] AustralianSimon@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Now that's hot sauce

[–] AustralianSimon@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Mmmm tear gassy food delivery

[–] urfavlaura@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I'd go with thermonuclear warheads

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Surely area of effect weaponry would be better.

The higher collateral impact just serves as an extra lesson to any wannabe thieves.