this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
423 points (89.5% liked)

politics

19096 readers
3238 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Heisme@lemmy.world 167 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don’t tempt me with a good time.

[–] esgpi@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think it goes further than that: she is threatening us with a good time.

[–] aseriesoftubes@lemmy.world 142 points 1 year ago (4 children)

She thinks she’s going to get the VP nod from Trump. As usual, she’s fucking delusional.

[–] PeleSpirit@lemmy.world 71 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Or she's under investigation for January 6th, I can hope.

[–] vettnerk@lemmy.ml 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Por que no los dos?

...or something like that. My spanish sucks.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It's correct, just need ¿ at the beginning for optimal pedantry.

[–] toasteecup@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And some accent marks + tildas

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Do an umlaut.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 57 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can see the bumper stickers now: "dumb and dumber 2024"

[–] aseriesoftubes@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (3 children)

But how will anyone know which is which?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Zippy@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I thought Sarah Palin was extreme. Greene makes her look like a Democrat.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] expected_crayon@lemmy.world 82 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

It’s like nobody ready the article. It says she’s considering challenging Kemp in a primary for Georgia Governor because he’s not defending Trump.

Edit: apparently I can read better - she wants to run against Kemp in the primary when he runs for Senate, not Governor.

[–] Vorticity@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago

What a crappy headline... Poorly executed click-bait that misinforms more than it informs.

[–] jdsquared@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But Kemp's serving his second term as Governor. He can't run again unless he waits 4 years after he's out of office. Which will be in 2026. EmptyG would have a whole another term as a congresswoman before we vote on the governor

I also didn't read the article, but are you sure that's what it said?

[–] expected_crayon@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah, I slightly misread - she wants to run against him in the primary when he runs for Senate. I’ll edit my comment. Thanks for pointing that out.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 72 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Bro I can tell you rn lady that being Trumps running mate wont end well.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

I don't think I've ever seen a double entendre for Gallows humor, but here we are.

[–] Glide@lemmy.ca 48 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Remember when MTG stood for Magic: The Gathering? I 'member.

[–] Reptorian@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 year ago

Well, if she's no longer elected, then it can still be.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] finthechat@kbin.social 39 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Clickbait title much? It's because she's considering a Senate run or being Trump's VP.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

~~The summary bot has Georgia governor (primary anyway).~~ apparently wrong.

[–] admiralteal@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Goddamn I hope she runs for gov.

Kemp is term-limited. He has to sit out from the office for the next term before he can run again, which means he'll probably seek some other office in the meantime. And whatever he runs for he's almost certain to get.

People talk about GA being a swing state, but it fucking isn't. MAGA doesn't do great statewide, but the GOP has near total control with little contest.

MTG on the ticket is EXACTLY what the GA Dems need to make some serious inroads in statewide elections.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] brawleryukon@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's a misread of the article/summary. It's saying that Kemp (the current GA governor) is talking about a Senate run and MTG would challenge him in a primary for the GOP Senate nomination.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Unaware7013@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

If she goes the VP route, hopefully she ends up a political nobody like that dink from alaska

[–] VanillaGorilla@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Because pence wasn't bad enough, now the dumb and dumber goblin needs a go.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DarkWasp@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This woman deserves to be indicted for her participation in Jan 6.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago
[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

Did her state introduce a literacy test she can't pass?

Or will she refuse because reading all those erotic stories would be a sin.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

IE: she's been offered a high-paying job fucking something else up in the private sector, probably to as much of the detriment of the human race as scientifically possible.

[–] 520@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

She literally thinks she's going to be VP...

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't even think Republicans are stupid enough to entertain that notion, but I've been sadly wrong before when estimating the stupidity of the GOP.

[–] squiblet@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Trump is likely to pick the most horrible person possible, so I assume that she is a contender.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 25 points 1 year ago

The headline made me think this was going to be good news.

[–] teamevil@unilem.org 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Hopefully she goes away forever

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

It’s a clickbate headline. She’s considering running for a higher office.

[–] cultsuperstar@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago

She won't. Trump said we'd never hear from again if he lost the election. They crave the spotlight.

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

She's eyeing the vp for Trump

[–] silentmaster@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Yeah, but the reason is even worse. She thinks she's going to be VP! AAAAAHHHHHHH!

[–] squiblet@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It would make me pine for someone smart and competent like Dan Quayle

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

God. Remember when misspelling potato fucked up your chance of political office?

Good times (only sorta).

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] highseas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 year ago

Time to cash in

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 10 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Flamethrowing GOP representative Marjorie Taylor Greene has suggested she might not defend her seat in Congress next fall after two commanding victories in Georgia's 14th District.

Following comments by Georgia Governor Brian Kemp—who is reportedly weighing a run for the U.S. Senate in 2026—criticizing recent, disproven assertions by Donald Trump that he won the battleground state in 2020, Greene said she might be willing to challenge Kemp in a GOP primary.

Assuming, of course, Trump doesn't decide to name her as his running mate after winning the Republican presidential nomination.

After publicly breaking with the far-right Freedom Caucus early this year to support the election of House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, with Trump's endorsement, Greene has been in lockstep with the former president.

In addition to Greene, Republicans like New York Representative Elise Stefanik and unsuccessful Arizona gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake are seen as top contenders along with Florida Representative Byron Donalds, another close Trump ally and a rising GOP star in the House.

Other possible names include South Carolina Senator Tim Scott, a 2024 presidential candidate who has been largely left unscathed by Trump's withering attacks on his GOP competitors on the campaign trail.


I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] Maddie@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Makes sense, while she's here, who's running hell?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] FReddit@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago
load more comments
view more: next ›