this post was submitted on 01 May 2024
15 points (100.0% liked)

Liberty Hub

268 readers
1 users here now

  1. No Discrimination, this includes usage of slurs or other language intended to promote bigotry
  2. No defending oppressive systems or organizations
  3. No uncivil or rude comments to other users
  4. Discussion, not debate. This community is exclusively for genuine logical debate, any comments using whataboutism or similar will be removed.
  5. No genocide denial or support for genocidal entities. Anyone that supports the mass murder of civilians will be banned.

These guidelines are meant to allow open discussion and ensure leftists and post-leftists can have a voice. If you are here to learn, then welcome! Just remember that if you're not a part of the left (Liberals don't count) then you are a visitor, please do not speak over our members.

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cerement@slrpnk.net 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

“Socialist papers have often a tendency to become mere annals of complaints about existing conditions. The oppression of the laborers in the mine, the factory, and the field is related; the misery and sufferings of the workers during strikes are told in vivid pictures; their helplessness in the struggle against employers is insisted upon: and this succession of hopeless efforts, related in the paper, exercises a most depressing influence upon the reader. To counterbalance that effect, the editor has to rely chiefly upon burning words by means of which he tries to inspire his readers with energy and faith. I thought, on the contrary, that a revolutionary paper must be, above all, a record of those symptoms which everywhere announce the coming of a new era, the germination of new forms of social life, the growing revolt against antiquated institutions. These symptoms should be watched, brought together in their intimate connection, and so grouped as to show to the hesitating minds of the greater number the invisible and often unconscious support which advanced ideas find everywhere, when a revival of thought takes place in society. To make one feel sympathy with the throbbing of the human heart all over the world, with its revolt against age-long injustice, with its attempts at working out new forms of life,—this should be the chief duty of a revolutionary paper. It is hope, not despair, which makes successful revolutions.” [emphasis added]

—Peter Kropotkin, Memoirs of a Revolutionist (1899)

[–] RiikkaTheIcePrincess@pawb.social 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That bolded bit reminds me of my life lately. Tons of scary stories and "not sugar coating" things just made me wake up several nights having some kinda panic attacks. Somecritter finally said something that made me feel like I wasn't just thrown a map and told to find a life in it, like I had someone who was going to help me make sure my life's not over now... and I suddenly was significantly more able to act for days. Nothing even came of it, I just got a little bit of hope instead of only more crap to worry about, or more crap to dig through, or more things I need to do but can't. Can't really overcome hopelessness by piling misery atop it.

Turns out an ounce of hope beats a ton of despair, at least for getting me moving. Maybe that Peter critter has some points 😅

I feel this, and I agree, but I also feel it from both sides. Maybe it's where I live, but I feel the "come on bro, don't worry about anything at all, everything is fiiiiiine the way it is" just as much as I feel the doomposting and rigidity, and they both can drag me down in separate ways.

And moreover I see myself coming here and being so rigid too, and on one hand -- it's true one can't just let certain groups hijack a movement -- but on the other hand, it's hard to know the line between that happening vs. people legitimately learning and growing, and any attempt to establish some kind of set principle about it would be just exacerbating the problem. I'm constantly second guessing myself, especially when it comes to how I'm interacting with others and if I'm actually contributing or detracting. Am I being dogmatic? Am I allowing people to grow and supporting them, or do I push people away? I've certainly witnessed the hostility to "difference, curiosity, openness, and experimentation" -- seen people who are clearly trying to help be pushed aside because maybe they're not NT or maybe they don't have all the right words for things yet, but it's hard to talk about this at all because people might think I'm talking about "woke" but this is -- and I can't stress this enough -- not that. And I'm talking online as well as in "real life" (as if there's a difference -- we're still people).

I normally read chapters before bed, but I couldn't get past that section I posted, and I woke up still thinking about it.