this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2024
195 points (95.8% liked)

Technology

59377 readers
3716 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 54 points 7 months ago (3 children)

People really handing their kids devices that have cellular service and unfettered internet access? All my kids devices have 2 layers of adblock, parental controls, and no cell service.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 37 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Ok. Or you could, you know, not give them these. Some pretty good data coming out on why this isn't a great idea. It's not just luddite ranting.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 11 points 6 months ago

Yup. I let my kids (7 and 10) play video games or watch approved shows and that's about it. They get 1 hour on Saturdays, and they can "earn" more any day by reading: 1 hour reading = 30 min "screen time." We have a max of 2 hours/day, but they can bank time day to day.

It works pretty well. They definitely abuse the system by going beyond their allotted time, but if I "find out," they lose privileges for a couple days, so it seems they stay pretty honest on average without a ton of oversight.

I don't have any parental controls/blocking except for:

  • ad blocker - screw ads
  • passcode on Switch - mostly because of my 4yo, my older kids know the code

Basically, I operate on trust and honesty, and I think it works okay.

[–] qooqie@lemmy.world 20 points 7 months ago (4 children)

I’ll probably get my kids a dumb phone for school when they get old enough. I want them to have cell service for emergencies of any kind.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

I thought about that but I myself am broke and have gotten all of these from relatives that no longer use them. If I could go back in time, I would have abstained and ripped our N64 from my brother's closet sooner.

[–] thr0w4w4y2@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I’d love a small box with a button that literally just calls my phone, has a mic and speaker and nothing else, no screen, no software, no proprietary lock-in. just a button.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Why would you not fetter the Internet access?

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 31 points 7 months ago

LoL your asking the addicted to not make their kids addicted. Good luck!

[–] Muffi@programming.dev 27 points 6 months ago (6 children)

The worst thing about this in my opinion, is that this is mostly a problem for the children from less resourceful families. There is already a tendency for children from lower socioeconomic households to have more problems with concentration. Adding smartphones will only exacerbate the problem and fuel the fires of growing inequality.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] EnderMB@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I went to look around a nursery the other day, one that is attached to a school. We walked past kids that couldn't have been older than 6-7 dancing (possibly filming) to a TikTok vid, on a brand-new looking iPhone.

I'm usually against governments getting involved in the internet, since they have such a piss-poor understanding of tech, but it would be good to see some kind of regulation that bans people of a certain age from operating a smartphone without a limited set of operations (i.e. to contact parents, to get school alerts, etc), alongside school bans for the use of social media on school grounds. My wife is a teacher, and cyber bullying is rampant, whether it's the police getting called in over someone (underage) sending nudes and having them posted online once they break up, or fights being planned via iMessage or WhatsApp, and sometimes even people creating fake Tinder/Grindr profiles of their teachers (or to try to match with them).

Obviously, there are parents that'll just say "fuck it, it keeps them quiet" or ones that'll let them use a smartphone due to peer pressure, but a lot of it can be cut down before it becomes a problem.

In many ways, I'm quite glad I grew up with AIM and MSN Messenger. This kind of online power would have been crazy to me as a kid, and I don't envy kids that have to deal with this landscape.

[–] PlainSimpleGarak@lemm.ee 11 points 6 months ago

Alternate headline: a quarter of UK parents are lazy and borderline absentee.

[–] FlickeringScreens@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I think it's fine for kids to have a phone as long as the parents properly limit their use

[–] ccunix@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Is the sort of parent who gives a 5 year old their own phone going really going to a limit the use? I think the crossover in that Venn diagram is pretty small.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It is not hard. Just have a family app and you can set an allowance of total and for each app. Takes like 10 minutes to set up.

[–] ccunix@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I know, but my point is that sort of parent has no desire to do so.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Either do I. But it's better to know what's going on and putting in the work. Your kids only benefit from it.

[–] FlickeringScreens@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago
[–] datendefekt@lemmy.ml 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Beyond the proven addictive effects of handing a dopamine device to your kid, there are legal ramifications many parents aren't aware of.

WhatsApp and TikTok aren't just there like air, free for all to consume. They are service providers and both sides are bound by a contract, the EULA. IIRC, WhatsApp recently reduced it minimum age from 16 to 12. So if you install WhatsApp on your 8 year old's phone, you have broken the contract.

[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 22 points 6 months ago

The only ramification being that they close the account if they find out. No one is getting arrested, getting a fine, or even going to court.

[–] Gutless2615@ttrpg.network 4 points 6 months ago

Seems bad, man.

[–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 7 months ago (3 children)

how else are children supposed to communicate with friends other than at school?

[–] richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one 9 points 7 months ago

They aren't.

[–] Rustmilian@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] HeavyRaptor@lemmy.zip 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] Hule@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

I guess their parents could arrange for them to meet sometimes.

Wait, that's too much work.

[–] menemen@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Dumb phone exist. My children got their dumb phones when they started walking to school on their own (so they can call us in case of a problem).

No internet, only 4 harmless games and I can control which numbers are allowed to call them and which numbers they are allowed to call.

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Made that mistake once. No more.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

They don't let you out of the room if you do that one. Plus the annoying little buggers are cute. And then there's the inevitable.... you're fucking getting old. In your 20s you tend to be pretty stupid and learn from that. In your 30s your at the top of your game. I'm your 40s you realize how valuable time is and that you're running out of it. I assume there's some more wisdom to be had between here and 6 feet under. Actually I'm choosing cremation. I want to be a vanilla creme. Why don't they just call it burning of the bodies? They gotta call it cremation because it sounds like ice cream like that. But yeah, when you die you don't take anything with you. So without kids to sell your shit and ruin everything, what's the point? Right?

[–] Mio@feddit.nu 1 points 6 months ago (3 children)

I am actually surprised that they even can use it. This is the time when they start to learn to read...

[–] ahal@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You're correct that most 5 year olds cannot read.. However there's so much you can do without knowing how to read. Plus kids are very good at pressing buttons and can figure stuff out by trial and error.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Have you met a kid? Kids know more about tech st 2 than some adults. They can navigate devices very easily without reading. They just copy what they see.

[–] 0nekoneko7@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

🤦‍♂️

load more comments
view more: next ›