this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2024
599 points (98.7% liked)

News

23300 readers
4557 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Loss of intensity and diversity of noises in ecosystems reflects an alarming decline in healthy biodiversity, say sound ecologists

Sounds of the natural world are rapidly falling silent and will become “acoustic fossils” without urgent action to halt environmental destruction, international experts have warned.

As technology develops, sound has become an increasingly important way of measuring the health and biodiversity of ecosystems: our forests, soils and oceans all produce their own acoustic signatures. Scientists who use ecoacoustics to measure habitats and species say that quiet is falling across thousands of habitats, as the planet witnesses extraordinary losses in the density and variety of species. Disappearing or losing volume along with them are many familiar sounds: the morning calls of birds, rustle of mammals through undergrowth and summer hum of insects.

Today, tuning into some ecosystems reveals a “deathly silence”, said Prof Steve Simpson from the University of Bristol. “It is that race against time – we’ve only just discovered that they make such sounds, and yet we hear the sound disappearing.”

“The changes are profound. And they are happening everywhere,” said US soundscape recordist Bernie Krause, who has taken more than 5,000 hours of recordings from seven continents over the past 55 years. He estimates that 70% of his archive is from habitats that no longer exist.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 83 points 7 months ago (4 children)

We are single handedly dooming our planet so a handful of people can be unbelievably wealthy. The vast majority of our resource expenditure is unnecessary. But the moment anyone stops the rat race means starvation, imprisonment, or execution. The human race is pitiful. I just hope we all can emancipate ourselves and bring humanity back in line with the reality of the situation.

[–] myliltoehurts@lemm.ee 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Pretty confident the planet will be fine, maybe it'll take 10 million years but it'll thrive again, in some form.

What we are dooming is humanity, and honestly at this point it seems like we deserve what's coming.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago

Yeah, who cares about all the animals we're dragging down with us, as long as we're not technically eliminating life itself it's all good

[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Remember the Permian-Triassic extinction? Now THAT seemed like it doomed the planet, right? Two mass extinction events, BLAM-BLAM, back to back!

80% of marine invertebrate species and 70% of terrestrial vertebrate species WIPED OUT FOREVER.

Too much oxygen sometimes, too little others - that time it rained for 2 million years - the two times volcanoes froze the Earth.

Yet like the Dude, the Earth abides.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Too much oxygen sometimes, too little others - that time it rained for 2 million years - the two times volcanoes froze the Earth.

That's right. In a meager checks notes 2M years, the native floura and fauna will be back on their feet, maybe, we hope.

Yet like the Dude, the Earth abides.

We're enjoying a certain degree of selection bias. We exist here because our planet did eventually recover. But this outcome wasn't predetermined.

Along the way, we may end up destroying things that are ultimately unrecoverable. The eye-sight of the trilobyte was a happy little accident no living species has yet been able to duplicate. Anerobic life has been relegated to the most remote and microscopic corners of the world. Natural longevity has degraded in younger variants and our genetic code is overloaded with failed, silenced adaptations that leave mammals more prone to cancer and other genetic defects that our historical counterparts are less frequently burdened by.

And that's assuming we aren't on an unwitting collision course with a real end game disaster - like the hyper-corrosive atmosphere of Venus or the depleted atmosphere of Mars.

What are the odds something as complex and intricate as the human brain will exist before our star goes nova and the planet is consumed in its expansion? It took us 4.5B years to get here. Crazy to toss it all out the window because some business nerds in DC and Detroit hate trains.

[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

There is no native anything. We're ALL transitional species. OF COURSE things get destroyed that are unrecoverable. We don't have fish with armor. We don't have giant sloths with stony skin. Trilobites are ALL OVER the Fossil record. We don't have a single one today.

Let's stop trying to preserve this thin slice, this snapshot of evolution as though it were the final destination. It's not.

I like people; I'm one of them. But humans have only been here a few hundred thousand years. Life wasn't struggling to produce US. We're a (in our own minds) happy accident, produced by the opportunities afforded us in one of those earlier extinctions.

We will not be throwing away 4.5B years of evolution. We'll just be demonstrating that too much intelligence is not a successful evolutionary trait.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kingofthezyx@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago

Yeah, we are not dooming the planet - we are dooming ourselves.

[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago (3 children)

there's at least 15 billion hands. Maybe 15.5.

15.5 billion handedly destroying the planet so that fewer than a few thousand hands can have most of the wealth.

[–] flicker@lemmy.world 22 points 7 months ago (1 children)

This implies every hand has an equal part in the destruction, which isn't quite an accurate representation.

[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

No individual cog chooses to make the machine run, or would given the choice, but cogs they are, all.

Capital will not rest until every cog is installed and generating the maximum amount of profit. Until of course, the cogs cease to be profitable. Then they will be discarded.

[–] TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Are you calling indigenous people, who live as hunter gatherers, cogs in the machine? Or are you just not counting them?

I think there are some groups of people that get a pass when it comes to blame for the destruction of our planet. It's a very insignificant amount of people in comparison to the total population, but they exist.

[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

They're not profitable, they will either be made profitable, or they'll be removed. The lands they inhabit will be repurposed and stripped off all resources.

This is actively already happening. It's happening right now, while you're reading this.

The relentless pursuit of capital has no room for those that do not contribute.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

We should start making vaults and move the rich into them, leave the rest of us outside to enjoy the world.

[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 72 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Reminds me of that report from a couple years ago that wildlife populations have seen close to a 70% decrease in the last 50 years. Basically over my lifetime 2/3rds of what makes the world wonderful has disappeared.

[–] BorgDrone@lemmy.one 27 points 7 months ago (1 children)

In the same timeframe, the number of humans has grown by 100%. Basically twice as much of what makes the world terrible.

[–] Lumisal@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago (4 children)

When you consider who causes the most destruction, it's actually very few humans that do the most damage.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ChocoboRocket@lemmy.world 56 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Pretty rough reality.

People in cities often don't know or understand the first thing about nature and are content imagining it as some pristine "other" place outside of the cities they never leave.

Rural people who have access to nature tend to vote for the "put every chemical in the environment as fast as possible" parties.

The poor who live near natural beauty without industry have no clout or means to change anything outside their immediate village (even then its not likely)

The rich people who actually enjoy nature, live near it, and want to protect it - often only want to protect it for themselves. At best their environmental efforts are offset 1000x by their lifestyle.

Don't get me wrong, there's plenty of rural/urban hunters, environmentalist, nature/outdoor lovers. But it's a relatively small group with little social crossover. And aside from the cottage are probably spending their entire outdoor experience on public walking paths and aren't aware of the extent of habitat loss, pollution, and mass die offs taking place.

We're completely fucked.

[–] just_change_it@lemmy.world 43 points 7 months ago (19 children)

If I try to make the argument that the earth is overpopulated i'll quickly get downvoted to oblivion in the typical thread.

There's too many humans. The only hope of life surviving long term is the fall of humankind. The writing is on the wall in terms of heading towards an extinction event anyway so it's not like we'll need to do anything for it to happen.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 27 points 7 months ago (4 children)

We can probably manage at our population level with better habits. Most of this loss is linked to pesticide use and our impact on the climate imo.

Our population levels amplify this but it would be fine if we weren't spitting out poison.

[–] just_change_it@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

With 8 billion humans it's too hard to centralize control or do anything to realistically get people to follow the rules. Things being technically possible is one thing, but human nature means it'll never actually happen. Humans are awful.

We're so obsessed with rules that nobody actually follows and covering up how things actually work. Whistleblowers have their lives ruined and these giant multibillion dollar conglomerates get a slap on the wrist. This is the world we live in and the systems we push for actively dissuade it from getting better.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 14 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Oh life will survive on this planet no matter what we do until the sun runs out of fuel. It's just us and a lot of stuff that might go with us that science gets concerned about.

It's basically impossible to wipe the earth of every last living species even if we nuke the surface of the earth and cause a nuclear winter some species would survive.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

It's so weird how any time you suggest it, a bunch of people show up and accuse you of being a Eugenicist, and how the earth can support 28bbillion humans or whatever.

Edit: although you kind of lost me with your second paragraph there.

[–] just_change_it@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

My second paragraph is basically: I have no faith in humanity coming out of all of it. I don't think humanity as a whole has any chance of changing course because of how humans just are.

Maybe we'll have runaway greenhouse gas causing catastrophic climate change. Maybe we'll blow everybody up in what some might call world war 3. Maybe we'll just have more and more humans be born until Earth can't support practically any non-human, non-livestock life. Maybe we'll have a biological outbreak that actually causes extremely high mortality rates. Maybe we'll have a CME hit and wipe out all electronics on the majority of the developed world. There's so many things that are more likely to happen than the majority of humanity changing course.

We can't even stop two pointless wars or fix American politics. There's no way humans can solve a global problem that requires believing in science and putting business owners second.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Don't look up.

[–] dan1101@lemm.ee 4 points 7 months ago

Same, there are too many humans and too much development and exploitation of Earth. None of the wealthy want to stop building and stabilize things.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 30 points 7 months ago (2 children)

To paraphrase James Carville, "It's the insects, stupid."

The older you are, the more obvious it is.

[–] evatronic@lemm.ee 12 points 7 months ago (4 children)

Remember when you would take a road trip and have to clean your windshield because of all the bugs?

[–] theangryseal@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

Come to Appalachia. My car is bug guts every evening when I get home. We still have the bastards and if you want to come get some I don’t mind.

I joke, but it is scary that we’re killing everything off.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Haggunenons@lemmy.world 26 points 7 months ago

We've got a community about animal acoustic communication for anyone interested

!digitalbioacoustics@lemmy.world

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 21 points 7 months ago

No mention of Rachel Carson? I realize she was writing about DDT, but she came up with the whole idea of the silence of nature as wildlife disappears due to human actions in 1962 and it applies even if DDT is not the cause.

[–] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 16 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Recently I've found that I often get sad listening to wildlife. I've got a sense that a lot of what I've seen and heard is very soon to be gone. Not like in 1000 years in some hard to imagine future, but rather maybe within my own lifetime. I'm mourning for a dying world.

I sometimes think about this story about a recording of a now extinct bird; and I remember that there are stacks of other examples of species that have recently gone extinct. Too many for people to even talk about each of them. Just a few nice-sounding high-profile cases capture people's attention every so often.

I do put in a bit of effort in my own lifestyle to not make things worse. But it seems to me that there will be vast damage to the world already before humanity course corrects appropriately. It's very depressing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ArcticAmphibian@lemmus.org 11 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Oh, nice. Going the way of Silent Spring.

[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 7 points 7 months ago

Society never fails to disappoint me when it comes to impending disaster. The Silent Spring is one of those developments that once again shocked me that nobody of consequence seems concerned about.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Incidentally, as the rodent and bird and bat population implodes, the number of disease-carrying insects is exploding.

Houston's adorable woollybear population basically have no natural predators left. And the mosquito season is going to be outright hellish as storms and heat turn the city into a giant sauna pit.

[–] Kalkaline@leminal.space 11 points 7 months ago

We have some trees on our property that have died and have some limbs that are looking pretty dead. We don't have the money to take them down, but the birds love them. Our mockingbirds love the stump in our front yard that's about 8ft tall, the woodpeckers recently had babies in one of the dead limbs in the back yard.

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago

If you have a garden making it wildlife (particularly insect) friendly is one of the small contributions you can make that can actually end up having a big impact. In addition to providing a small area where populations can recover your also creating a stepping stone that can make it easier for animals to traverse between larger habitats.

[–] blazera@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Sucks that its bipartisan now to just build more roads, buy bigger cars, and drill more oil.

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

In the U.S., we don't have a progressive option. We can only choose between conservative and more conservative.

Conservatism is cancer. It is killing us all.

[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Maybe it's just hiding.

Have we tried looking extra hard?

Maybe it's under something.

Where did you last see it?

[–] Zink@programming.dev 7 points 7 months ago

We’d better fire up the diesel generators to shed more light on this search!

[–] MilitantVegan@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago
load more comments
view more: next ›