this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2024
178 points (94.5% liked)

Open Source

31223 readers
281 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 41 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I grew up in the era where open-source was just starting out and creators were giving ๐Ÿ–• to big tech and naming their products wacky names.

This reminds me of that era.

[โ€“] Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Suyu, a fork of the Yuzu emulator which was taken down by Nintendo, is an excellent example.

[โ€“] sadreality@kbin.social 17 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Nintendo are fucking clowns and so are JP IP laws. Fuck 'em both.

[โ€“] thantik@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

You mean the one that was just recently...taken down?

Yeah, didn't last as long as I'd hoped it would.

[โ€“] Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Only the repo on GitLab was taken down, in response, they just created their own Forgejo instance. They also have their own website: https://suyu.dev/

load more comments (2 replies)
[โ€“] 7heo@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 months ago

Only the gitlab project was taken down. They moved.

[โ€“] GravitySpoiled@lemmy.ml 39 points 7 months ago (5 children)

What else does it apart from rebranding firefox and getting ad revenue?

[โ€“] Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 57 points 7 months ago (4 children)

It has a few privacy features, some themes, some other stuff. Nothing significant. It kinda became popular lately, and some people started using it. But now it's proprietary, so I wouldn't use it anymore. LibreWolf is much better and open source.

[โ€“] SuperSpecialNickname@lemmy.ml 10 points 7 months ago (3 children)

It also has double sidebars so I can put tabs in one of them instead of the top of the screen and hide the titlebar without having to modify userchrome.css. That's one thing I missed from Vivaldi when I moved to Firefox.

load more comments (3 replies)
[โ€“] headroom@lemmy.ml 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Are there any benefits to using LibreWolf if I'm alrrady using Arkenfox?

[โ€“] Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 7 months ago

Not really, I just find LibreWolf much easier to install. I don't want to mess around with downloading and copying Firefox profiles every time.

[โ€“] Apollo2323@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 7 months ago

Or Mullvad Browser. I really like that browser too.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] Treeniks@lemmy.ml 22 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I believe the main thing people liked about Floorp is tab grouping and vertical tab layout ร  la Vivaldi, and a more modern and slim design out of the box, while keeping a firefox core instead of being another chromium based browser.

[โ€“] governorkeagan@lemdro.id 4 points 7 months ago

This. I use floorp for work and Firefox for personal stuff.

load more comments (3 replies)
[โ€“] fl42v@lemmy.ml 22 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Welp, the message you've cross-posted was since edited to include

Edit: They claim they will make that part open source too, eventually, and it is due to behavior of another browser: https://github.com/Floorp-Projects/Floorp-core/issues/62

[โ€“] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Can somebody elaborate on this? How could somebody stealing their code be a problem?

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] Redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 7 months ago

It appears they just did, as of a few minutes ago while I was looking into it

Here is the now open private components repo under the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 license
And I forked it just to be sure

[โ€“] flappy@lemm.ee 22 points 7 months ago (8 children)

Ah for fucks sake, I really liked this browser.

load more comments (8 replies)
[โ€“] DrSleepless@lemmy.world 21 points 7 months ago

My dog loves floorp. He does it whenever he gets excited to meet someone new.

[โ€“] priapus@sh.itjust.works 20 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

The creator of Floorp posted a reponse to this: https://blog.ablaze.one/4125/2024-03-11/

TLDR posted by the creator: creator:

To put it simply, the current Floorp, including forks, will end the moment I stop maintaining it, so to prevent that from happening, I have prohibited forks. The idea is to solve the user's concern about code transparency by tightening the license when returning to open source, and to create a sustainable Floorp by giving them the choice of paying money or helping with the coding.

Unfortunately a lot of this seems in reponse to Midori, a seemingly hostile fork with a pretty suspcious website.

[โ€“] beyond@linkage.ds8.zone 32 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Unfortunately a lot of this seems in reponse to Midori, a seemingly hostile fork with a pretty suspcious website.

To some people all forks are hostile. This appears to be such a case. He just seems to be sour over people exercising the same freedoms he got from Mozilla upstream. Rules for thee but not for me. The free software community doesn't need his obscure fork.

[โ€“] priapus@sh.itjust.works 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

I disagree in this case. The majority of Firefox forks make it clear they're a fork, giving credit to Mozilla. Midori seems to hide that they're a fork while adding very little to the browser. Their website also takes donations while having a fake phone number and broken contact button. Hard not to see that as suspicious.

Edit: the dev was also completely ok with Firedragon switching to their codebase because they did so resepectfully.

I still disagree with what the dev did, but I get the struggle.

[โ€“] beyond@linkage.ds8.zone 4 points 7 months ago

I agree that the Midori website is suspicious however their repo properly credits Firefox and Floorp in the very first sentence of the readme (however they don't actually link to this repo for some reason). In any case, my intent isn't to defend Midori (which I don't use or have any interest in) but rather to defend the four freedoms none of which are conditional on how much a fork adds or contributes back. In other words, it's perfectly ok to just fork something and change the name.

I still maintain it's ironic that a fork developer is complaining about forks of his fork. This statement is baffling but I suppose it comes from a proprietary mindset where copying is theft:

If these are forked, my hundreds of hours will have been wasted.

By this logic the decades of development time on Firefox is wasted because of this guy's fork.

[โ€“] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 14 points 7 months ago (1 children)

They just open sourced the private repository 7 minutes ago, 2024-03-24T12:39Z

[โ€“] Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

That's great. I edited the post title.

[โ€“] Interstellar_1@pawb.social 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Can you edit the post to say why it is outdated? I was confused seeing the title.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] alexdeathway@programming.dev 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

just installed few week ago and now this.

[โ€“] Jontique@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

Same here. this is upsetting :/ Back to firefox I guess

floorp makes me think of the old social web browser, flock which is giving me mega nostalgia.

[โ€“] bloom_of_rakes@lemm.ee 5 points 7 months ago

I kinda like the name, actually.

[โ€“] beyond@linkage.ds8.zone 5 points 7 months ago (6 children)

The "open sourced" private components repo is under a fauxpen source (non-commercial) license. Floorp is still proprietary.

load more comments (6 replies)
[โ€“] Sunny@slrpnk.net 2 points 7 months ago

Floorp also seems to be dropping support for workspaces in the near future..

https://github.com/Floorp-Projects/Floorp/issues/618#issuecomment-1842971843

load more comments
view more: next โ€บ