this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2024
260 points (97.8% liked)

politics

19271 readers
1683 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A new transcript from a key Hunter Biden witness undercuts many of the claims Republicans are making about “Biden corruption.”

The House Oversight Committee on Tuesday released the transcript of the testimony of Kevin Morris, a friend of and attorney for Hunter Biden, and his statements undercut everything Republicans have said about the embattled first son.

Morris is a high-powered entertainment lawyer in Los Angeles who met Hunter at a 2019 presidential fundraiser for his father, Joe Biden. Morris has loaned Hunter nearly $5 million in the years since. He testified about his relationship with Hunter in a closed-door committee hearing last week.

Initially, Oversight Chair James Comer just released a list of paraphrased highlights from Morris’s testimony. Comer claimed that Morris informally loaned Hunter the money and does not expect to be repaid until after the 2024 election—or possibly ever. But the transcript shows this couldn’t be further from the truth.

In reality, Morris never once mentioned the possibility of forgiving the loans. Instead, he said he has a “100 percent” expectation that Hunter will repay him, and repeatedly states that he and Hunter have a series of promissory notes agreeing the younger Biden will pay back the money.

all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 114 points 11 months ago (3 children)

why are we supposed to care about this? is it worth spending hundreds of millions of dollars in man-hours to achieve... whatever it is?

is this a butteryemails thing that wont die because conservatives have no real agenda and love to waste government resources?

[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 72 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

is this a butteryemails thing that wont die because conservatives have no real agenda and love to waste government resources?

Bingo.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 34 points 11 months ago

The government is bad because it’s broken! Help us break it some more!

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 32 points 11 months ago

I don't know... Loans without expectations of repayment to someone who doesn't work in the government??? Lies or not, I reserve that kind of behavior for my Supreme Court Justices, not some random guy who has zero impact on my daily life!

[–] isthereany 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I'm sure the Democrats would never waste millions of dollars on a frivolous investigation that ends having achieved nothing.

Anyway we care because the President is being bribed by foreigners using his son as a proxy. He lied about it, was caught, and then our intelligence agents including current employees lied about the whole story being made up in order to bury a damaging story during an election.

Then there is the fact that the President's son is a crack addicted whore monger who travels the country while illegally packing firearms and constantly picking up new whores to entertain while he does crack. We are supposed to believe he is also an international businessman worthy of serving of boards of foreign state connected energy corporations but has never once even discussed business with his high profile politician father, AKA "The Big Guy." It's pretty entertaining and he is EASILY the most FUCK UP member of a Presidential family in history. Literal cracked on dick picks and budget whores. It represents the current paradigm of a failed nation dominated by degenerate corrupt morons covering for each other from top to bottom in all areas of American life.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 1 points 11 months ago

hhahhhahahha absolutely hilarious.

ok now talk about the 2billion the trumps made selling shit to the saudis

or the millions trump made directly from over seas vendors/governemnts

puhlease

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 41 points 11 months ago

Initially, Oversight Chair James Comer just released a list of paraphrased highlights from Morris’s testimony. Comer claimed that Morris informally loaned Hunter the money and does not expect to be repaid until after the 2024 election—or possibly ever. But the transcript shows this couldn’t be further from the truth.

This is exactly why they want Hunter in a closed-door session. They want to be able to lie about what he said. Hopefully this shows that won't be enough for them to be able to get away with it.

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Having disgraceful relatives is a long political tradition. Billy Carter surely wasn’t the first but just in the era I know about, Roger Clinton accepted a $50,000 Rolex from the Gambino mafia family. Nancy Reagan was the throat GOAT. George HW Bush had an idiot son who broke everything he touched.

I can’t remember an Obama one that came up but there probably was one. Maybe someone in Kenya has made a Billy Beer equivalent. And the Trump boys would clearly eat decorative soap and say, “This candy kind of sucks.” and then eat another one.

And it was probably worse before. The Kennedy family certainly had their share of fuck ups.

[–] Agrivar@lemmy.world 37 points 11 months ago

The Kennedy family certainly had their share of fuck ups.

Have. Let's not forget that RFK Jr. is out there denying vaccines and trying to spoil the election.

[–] remotelove@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Uh, what is a throat GOAT? I am scared to Google for that.

[–] PorradaVFR@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It is alleged that she had a reputation for being very good at oral sex and had demonstrated such skills to numerous Hollywood figures. I have absolutely no personal knowledge to verify or dispute such an assertion.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What you HAVEN'T gotten blown by Nancy Reagan? Weird!

[–] PorradaVFR@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Indeed, I have led a sheltered life.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Or one of tragic deprivation 🤷

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

GOAT means greatest of all time. Throat means oral sex. Allegedly Nancy Reagan nee Davis used her oral skills to get Ronnie to drop his first wife.

Young Nancy Reagan

https://i.pinimg.com/736x/d6/d2/b5/d6d2b574d5746dfe416eb4334422a1a0--nancy-reagan-ronald-reagan.jpg

[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

If youre gonna be out here looking like ET, you better be able to throat home.

[–] Nobody@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago

Are we still doing nothingburger? Is nothingburger still a thing?

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

Not gonna stop these idiots from milking it for all it's worth, though.

[–] ook_the_librarian@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Question for a lawyer:

Were we going to see this eventually, or was it only released because Comer lied about it?

There was mention of Morris's lawyer snapping back at Comer last week. Is this the product of that?

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The individual Congressional committees have full control over what is released, though each chamber could surely force one of their committees to release information it if they felt like it.

[–] ook_the_librarian@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I was thinking that was the case for congressional stuff. I seem to remember a civil deposition that was released early due to mischaracterization in the media. Seems you would need to have a judge in the loop for that. I also could be misremembering the facts anyway.

Thanks.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

And I don't think that the courts can impose anything here. That's all legislative branch business, separation of powers and such.

[–] ook_the_librarian@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Right. Just to clarify "seems like you need a judge, *and that's obviously not the case here as it would be to the civil context."

Fixed that for me. Thanks again.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

The cases that have gone to court recently over Congressional subpoenas are really not the judicial branch getting involved with the legislative branch, but rather affirming that the legislative branch has that power and you have to comply. Really the courts are just acting as the teeth for Congress in this case.

[–] jak@sopuli.xyz 6 points 11 months ago

Bruh, I just realized now that this guy is different from James Comey.