512
submitted 8 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

A federal judge threatened to kick Donald Trump out of court Wednesday after the former president made repeated comments within earshot of the jury hearing a civil defamation trial against him.

Trump muttered that the case is a “witch hunt,” among other similar comments, according to a lawyer for the writer E. Jean Carroll, who is suing Trump over derogatory comments he made about her while he was president.

The episode prompted a stern rebuke from U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan, who repeatedly tussled with Trump and his lawyers during a testy courtroom session Wednesday morning.

“Mr. Trump has the right to be present here. That right can be forfeited, and it can be forfeited if he is disruptive, which is what has been reported to me,” the judge said.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Veedem@lemmy.world 140 points 8 months ago

He just seems like the kind of guy who’s never been punched in the face but really needs to be.

[-] iamjackflack@lemm.ee 36 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I’d prefer shot with a bologna loaf out of a canon but yea agreed

[-] SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml 50 points 8 months ago

I tried loading lunch meat into my canon but it developed a film.

[-] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 24 points 8 months ago

This was such an intricately crafted joke that my brain almost couldn't handle it.

[-] PunnyName@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

It's just too good!

[-] dasJot@feddit.de 6 points 8 months ago

I’m still waiting for someone to ask for an explanation and someone (possibly else) to provide one.

[-] Bo7a@lemmy.ca 9 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)
  • Cannon - A big ass gun
  • Canon - A camera brand

With those two pieces I'm sure it will click for you ;)

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 10 points 8 months ago

This is that joke you're so proud of, but then you tell people IRL about it and they just look at you and say "OK? Hah?" But you know in your gut it is perfect.

We see your perfection, and thank you for it.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 121 points 8 months ago

so presidential when you cant control your own behavior.

conservatives really picking the best people.

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 85 points 8 months ago

They want the worst people. They love it. It makes them feel better about being such shitty people themselves.

[-] IHeartBadCode@kbin.social 42 points 8 months ago

For years they told us that Government would mess everything up.

And by god they're going to prove it!

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 11 points 8 months ago

Every accusation is a confession

[-] zcd@lemmy.ca 71 points 8 months ago

So it’s cool if we fuck around in court? Contempt isn’t a thing anymore?

[-] Badeendje@lemmy.world 41 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Federal judges (should) have a lot more decorum and patience. Actually all judges should have, but the US also popularized the mini dictators that dole out ridiculous punishments for "misbehaving".

People in court are not there because they bought tickets to the venue for their own enjoyment.

While I agree Trump should also have some decorum, he is effectively rich trailer trash. The judge treats him as such and in my book that makes the judge an icon.

The judge is above his petty nonsense but does take the time to make trump feel he is not in charge every time he steps out. And I think this is far worse for Trump's feelings than being stuck in a holding cell, that would just fuel his martyr syndrome.

[-] twistypencil@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

Yeah, but when he is influencing the jury with his comments, that is different

[-] Bdtrngl@lemmy.world 26 points 8 months ago

He's rich and white so business as usual.

[-] PugJesus@kbin.social 11 points 8 months ago

For rich people? No.

[-] eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 8 months ago

He's above the law. He knows it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] TheBat@lemmy.world 60 points 8 months ago

You want Trump to lose in court ASAP

I want Trump to lose against diabetes ASAP

We are not the same

[-] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 22 points 8 months ago

I know it's a longshot, but I'm really hoping for rabies.

[-] scottywh@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago

It's probably syphilis though.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Evia@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

I hope for nothing contagious: his sycophants would deliberately infect themselves to be more like him and end up causing a rabies pandemic

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] root_beer@midwest.social 8 points 8 months ago

You want Trump to lose against diabetes ASAP

I want Trump to lose, on the toilet, against a perforated colon and prolapsed rectum ASAP

We are, well, kinda the same, so hi-five friendo

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SleepingTower@lemmy.world 52 points 8 months ago

While "former president" is a correct title, the media should really use "petulant man-child" instead. Far more accurate .

[-] PilferJynx@lemmy.world 28 points 8 months ago
[-] PunnyName@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago
[-] rustyfish@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

This one. I choose this one.

[-] Kcap@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

Just giving "Shrimpdick McGee" it's day in court.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] wildcardology@lemmy.world 45 points 8 months ago

That's why he keeps doing it. They just threaten, no real consequences.

[-] APassenger@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

Isn't a lack of self control central to this case?

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

It's more that the judges will play by the rules so super hard that Trump can never appeal on the basis of unfair treatment. The consequence is really that the trials continue on as if he had never spoken, proving that his crying and hand waving have no real effect.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] TheJims@lemmy.world 36 points 8 months ago

This lawless former president is a disgusting degenerate just like his cult followers.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 34 points 8 months ago

Not being able to control oneself is a trait I require in a president.

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] grue@lemmy.world 32 points 8 months ago

Don't just kick him out; give him a time-out in a holding cell!

[-] Zozano@lemy.lol 8 points 8 months ago

time-of-his-life cell, when?

[-] Wirrvogel@feddit.de 30 points 8 months ago

Aaaand that's why two of his lawyers withdrew only shortly before the trial one even just the day before. They realised how unhinged he is and that there was no way to stop him, so they left the sinking ship.

[-] youngGoku@lemmy.world 23 points 8 months ago

Please I hope he forfeits his right to be there lol

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 35 points 8 months ago

He wants to be kicked out. His antics are meant to force it.

This way he can go keep that martyred persecution complex working for him. Evangelicals love them a martyr,

[-] grue@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago

That's why it's important for them to put him in a holding cell instead of letting him pontificate to the media on the courthouse steps.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Well, that and the whole the fucker incited an insurrection, and has promised to do it again,

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Omega_Jimes@lemmy.ca 19 points 8 months ago

"I do not recognize the authority of a court that hangs the gilded flag. A flag with gilded edges signifies an admiralty court, an admiralty court signifies that this is a court martial. I can not be court martialed twice. Further more..."

"Bailiff, gag that man."

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago

Honestly I don't think Trump should be kicked out of court. I say let him ruin his case and insult the judge until he's found guilty for contempt of court as well.

[-] skulblaka@startrek.website 11 points 8 months ago

He's already well past what would be considered contempt of court for literally any other living human being. They're giving him as much rope as is possible for two reasons, one being so that absolutely no one can argue a mistrial, and the second being that he continues to attempt to hang himself with every length of rope let out to him. May as well let him continue.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] stoly@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Mr. Trump has the right to be present here. That right can be forfeited, and it can be forfeited if he is disruptive...

Doesn't that make it a privilege?

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] spider@aussie.zone 11 points 8 months ago

'You just can't control yourself'

The judge apparently doesn't understand the difference between "can't" and "don't want to".

[-] NaNABCV@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

Biden needs to punch this guy out

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2024
512 points (98.1% liked)

politics

18933 readers
3400 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS