this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2024
-12 points (36.4% liked)

politics

19097 readers
3122 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I am not convinced Trump will be on the Georgia ballot even if he doesn't get any other penalty in the trial.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

True, but that shouldn't make anyone feel better. Biden still has to make his case to voters, Trump or no Trump. We should not assume that Biden has any easier time if Trump is disqualified. If anything, it might be more difficult, particularly if Trump is thrown off some ballots and not others. That would mean Biden would have to run against multiple candidates, but still need a majority of EC votes to secure the election.

Republicans can effectively win without a majority of EC votes, because then the election goes to the State delegations in Congress, where Republicans have the advantage.

[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago

Trump won't be on the primary ballot in Nevada for sure. Nevada GOP decided to just give it to him.

[–] aelwero@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's pie in the sky to have polls this early, and even if it wasn't wildly premature to look at polls, they aren't great at actually predicting the outcome, because the people who conduct polls have a tendency towards polling people and areas that'll tell them what they want to hear...

[–] Bojimbo@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago

It's also a live telephone poll. This type of pole has a lot of trouble getting a representative sample of people under the age of 40.

[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I believe Romney was "beating" Obama at this point in their election race.

Democrats have beat polls by 9+ points at ballot boxes since Roe v. Wade was overturned.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If Dems keep campaigning on how Republicans are actively trying to remove people's bodily autonomy, restrict people's right to exist, and set up a State Religion, they should be able to overcome voter apathy.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

they should be able to overcome voter apathy.

You severely underestimate the power of apathy.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 1 points 10 months ago

It's what keeps me from sliding into it myself.

[–] the_q@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago (3 children)

There are some diligent Trump supporters on here constantly posting that he's ahead of Biden on Pluto and in Atlantis etc. Trying to demoralize?

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I'm a Democrat to the core. But it's important to know what we're up against. Democrats will win if we show up, but we need to show up or it's back to Trump.

[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's early to be in panic mode. I can't handle 11 months of terror. Let's see how things look in October. I'm voting against Trump anyway, unless I get an anxiety-induced heart attack.

[–] the_q@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago
[–] the_q@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Do you honestly believe there are voters who don't know what Trump is and what he's done? You think there are those that are undecided that will see these "Trump's ahead!" and go "not on my watch in 11 months!"

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Yes, I do. There are people who plan to sit on the sidelines but will come out to vote if there's a risk of another Trump presidency. The US has notoriously low voter turnout compared to other mature democracies.

[–] aelwero@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I agree with this... Getting people to turn up to vote in key places is the determining factor this time, same as last time. Biden won specifically because people showed up. It was very much a "not on my watch" kinda thing

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

There are voters who think that "Trump Derangement Syndrome" is a thing, that Trump is no worse in his ethics than any other politician, annd that the only reason he is being charged is that "The Left" is out to ruin him, not because of anything he has done.

There's a bit of denial there, to be sure, but the people who think this way surround themselves with media that reinforces this view. They have no reason to believe otherwise.

Trump seems to have a firm base who will support him no matter what. But, the only effective way to counteract that it to make sure that enough other people turn out in the right states to constitute a EC victory. So while these recent headlines might not turn a Biden voter into a Trump voter, they may contribute to a Biden voter giving up and not showing up at all. Trump voters are definitely going to show up, though.

Low turnout + solid base = Trump wins

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Georgia went red every election after 1992, the surprise was Biden turning it blue, not that Trump is leading there now.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

It's not demoralizing. It's acknowledging the reality of the situation.