this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2023
317 points (72.9% liked)

Memes

45660 readers
1915 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 91 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Both sides ARE bad. The trick is to use critical thinking and realize that one side is "stupid and misguided" bad and the other is "literal nazi, genocide against minorities, and also very stupid" bad.

[–] NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social 57 points 11 months ago (11 children)

Both sides are currently supporting genocide right now.

You might want to fix that.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 80 points 11 months ago (14 children)

“The son of YOUR president took a single bribe and showed his ding dong on the internet, my president rapes women, lies about his finances, commits fraud and incites an insurrection! See both side are bad!”

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 44 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Both sides are bad the same way that day-past-expiration milk and arsenic are both yucky

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Great way of putting it. Also, your username made me almost spit out my coffee lmao

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

You probably should spit it out. I heard the creamer was expired.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Such exquisite fartistry!

[–] NightAuthor@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

And some of us just really want fresh healthy food. At least some of us will eat the day old food, but won’t be happy about that being the best choice. But because of polarization and group think, we’re just lumped in with the nazis. The internet is fun.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 39 points 11 months ago (11 children)

Both sides are bad. Yes, one is considerably worse than the other, but that doesn't make the alternative good, it just makes it better.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Stez827@sh.itjust.works 39 points 11 months ago

Both are bad though one is worse but both are shit

[–] Cinner@lemmy.world 29 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Propagandistic bullshit.

Saying you can't say "both sides suck" means we're stuck with only two and must pick one.

Two is not the only option.

But it's difficult to mobilize the bread eaters as they watch the circus.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 22 points 11 months ago (6 children)

sort of

But I do think there is a legitimate ACAB angle here, to slice it by power dynamics instead: All political leaders are bastards.

It's not just one nation vs another, it's also civilians vs the political elite. So while I agree it's wrong to say "both sides are equally to blame", there are other useful perspectives. I think.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Pilkins@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago (3 children)

For me at least, it's more of "conservatives are crazy, conspiracy-led, bigots but liberals are annoying." and this of course only applies to the most outspoken of both sides.

I know plenty of people who vote republican, that are decent people (not antivax, not racist, not homophobic), but are either religious or gun nuts. Hell, I have a coworker that agrees with 95% of democratic policies but will never vote for them because they'll "take his guns." Do I think they're dumb, sure. Do I think they're evil, no?

Liberals I see like vegans. The core messaging is right, but the preachier you get, the more people are going to dislike you, even if they agree with you on principle. Even though I've voted democrat in every election, I couldn't help but roll my eyes when someone told me I should stop using the word "marijuana" because it's racist.

I don't really want to hang out with qanon, racist types or people where I have to be careful of saying "mailman" instead of "mail carrier". Obviously if I had to choose, it'd be the latter, but I don't have to choose because 80% of people aren't that politically motivated every second of their day.

[–] kurwa@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (4 children)

I think the amount of annoying anal liberals such as that is overblown. And whenever I do see that, I see other leftists calling their shit out.

What's really "both sides" is the fact that Democrats don't do enough when they have the chances too, because really the majority opinion of the Democrats is way farther right then people in the US like to admit.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (3 children)

I have a coworker that agrees with 95% of democratic policies but will never vote for them because they'll "take his guns."

Did he not hear trump say he likes to take the guns first and worry about the law later? Did he not hear trump say China was too soft in Tiananmen Square?

The Democrats are coming for the guns... but so is trump.

[–] Pilkins@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

You're giving these guys too much credit. They don't follow the news or read anything, ever. This is the same coworker who, when a hasidic Jewish person walked into our shop, said "I thought Amish couldn't work with electricity" and was 100% genuine.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What alternative is there to getting preachier? I don’t get in people’s faces, but I understand why people do it. For years, they’ve lightly suggested perhaps making things not terrible, and it’s let the far right get away with heinous shit.

[–] Pilkins@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Depends on context. If someone is saying "wow I hate all gays and hope they're put in extermination camps" then sure I'd speak up and tell them they're a piece of shit. If someone says "I think gays should have equal rights but personally I think it's wrong" then I'd shrug it off. I think there's a line between outright hatred and ignorance/cultural/religious-norms that people ignore too much. Qanon type people are too far gone, but the others I think could change, and immediately shutting them down as racists or homophobes doesn't help sway them.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] FluorideMind@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Both sides have always been bad?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] oldbaldgrumpy@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Can't we start a 'We all suck' movement. There are shitty people of all races, genders, ethnicities, religions, or whatever. Once we all embrace that we can all evolve and work against them.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

Good luck, when people have a literal moral superiority complex most of their lives.

[–] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 10 points 11 months ago

Both sides are bad, but one is absolutely evil.

[–] rwhitisissle@lemmy.ml 10 points 11 months ago (7 children)

This is an ancient opinion. People have been complaining about America's two party system for literal centuries.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I get why people want to choose the smaller evil but sometimes it's necessary to point out all evils and head towards a stateless society.

But maybe that's the difference between "both sides bad" and "two sides bad"

[–] acastcandream@beehaw.org 12 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (13 children)

You’re not wrong that we should be able to critique everyone in government, but that’s not what people are taking issue with so it’s not really the problem. You’re kind of omitting the second half. “Both sides are the same, so it doesn’t make a difference what I do/I’ll just keep voting the way I have/I won’t vote because it doesn’t matter.”

I just don’t understand how “both sides are the same” could possibly hold any water after Roe was repealed. That’s evidence enough to the contrary, but people are far more concerned with sounding like they are “above the fray” and being perceived as big brain skeptics (even if they are uninformed on the issues) so they repeat it anyway. That or they are still voting MAGA and want to create a false equivalency.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] cobra89@beehaw.org 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

To all the people who want to vote third party or withhold their vote, please tell me, when had that ever effected change?

This idea that if you hold your vote or vote 3rd party you're gonna teach the establishment a lesson is laughable. No, the system will go on without you and you'll just have even less of a voice/decision in the direction of our country.

There is a reason certain people work so hard to tell you your vote doesn't matter. You're all falling for it.

Edit: If you don't like the candidates you have to choose from then go out and vote in the primaries because there's about a 90% chance you're not doing that.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Rustmilian@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago (11 children)

Can't we just vote in someone completely new for once.

[–] CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

We actually did that recently. His name was Donald Trump.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] BeefPiano@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago (5 children)

Show me any decision of consequence in life that doesn’t have a downside. There are no perfect choices, just less bad ones. And in the 2024 US election there’s one choice that’s a lot worse than the other.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Both sides is older than any of us. Enlightened centrism is a plague on intelligence

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

The way I see it in the face of climate change disaster literally neither side is going to save us. That is the most important thing to me right now.

It's already too late, but it's even later to reduce the impact.

[–] fadingembers@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 11 months ago

To your point, I would contend every year in every two party system in existence has always been a "both sides bad" year ;p

load more comments
view more: next ›