92
submitted 10 months ago by DannyMac@lemmy.world to c/raspberrypi@lemmy.ml
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TheHolyChecksum@infosec.pub 25 points 10 months ago

I have seen a Cisco router with 17 years of uptime in an internet exchange in Canada.

[-] NocturnalEngineer@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

Who needs security patching or maintenance support anyway.

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

Who said it was connected to the internet?

[-] Fox@pawb.social -1 points 10 months ago

Who said only internet-facing assets need to be patched?

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

Who said it was connected to a network?

[-] Fox@pawb.social 10 points 10 months ago

What would be the point of a router not connected to any network?

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

I dunno. Development? Ask OP.

[-] Fox@pawb.social 3 points 10 months ago

This comment thread is about an unpatched router (probably in production) at a Canadian Internet exchange

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I have seen a Cisco router with 17 years of uptime in an internet exchange in Canada.

What's an internet exchange in this context? I thought it meant an online forum.

[-] maryjayjay@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Probably a co-lo where different carriers peer.

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Got it. Thanks for explaining.

[-] Evotech@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Developing for a 17 year old router

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Bro. There are people who are developing in Cobol for 50 year old systems.

There are games still being released for the original, 80s-era Nintendo.

So.... yeah. Unlikely? Sure. Impossible? Nope.

[-] Evotech@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago

It's not running on 50 year old hardware I can guarantee you that

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Uh, yeah, we established that a couple of comments ago. My point is that if people today still develop for 50-year-old hardware, it's not unreasonable to think that they could be developing for 17 year old hardware.

Frankly, I'm already bored with this conversation. Have a nice evening.

[-] netburnr@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago

Not rebooting for security patches isn't something to be proud of.

[-] evranch@lemmy.ca 4 points 10 months ago

On the other hand, network partitioning and security that means you don't have to reboot an internal device for security patches is something to be proud of.

On my site we have tons of archaic, unpatchable industrial devices.

[-] Napain@lemmy.ml 8 points 10 months ago

I'm tired boss

[-] OR3X@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

I had a old ubuntu file server running on a PIII that ran for 2ish years. I thought that was impressive, but 6 is pretty awesome for non-enterprise grade hardware.

this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2023
92 points (98.9% liked)

raspberrypi

3194 readers
19 users here now

Community about the single-board computers, micro-controllers and related projects.

https://www.raspberrypi.com/

Other RaspberryPi communities on Lemmy

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS