this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
219 points (91.0% liked)

Technology

59377 readers
3189 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

also feel free to comment your own suggestions for news sites for tech updates that don't pay wall on the web page.

New York times - https://www.nytimes.com/section/technology abc - https://abcnews.go.com/technology

the hill - https://thehill.com/policy/technology/ BBC news - https://www.bbc.com/news/technology

while nonprofit Npr doesn't pay wall, they have a new pop up that says something along the likes of "expected a paywall not our style please donate" that the user can dismiss and continue browsing the site. https://www.npr.org/sections/technology/

Reuters use to be a good source for me untill they started pay walling after a small amount of news article reads.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Squeak@lemmy.world 73 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

thanks I thought that my English was getting even worse

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

More and more news sites are implementing paywalls, and even Reuters has joined the trend. Here are some sources that do not have paywalls

I guess

[–] Mr_Blott@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago (1 children)

more and more news sites are pushing for paywalls even reuters now here are some sources that don't have pay walls and Npr mentions paywall in their own new pop-up?

Have you got a paywall on fuckin punctuation mate 😂

[–] Seventhlevin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

PAYWALL PAYWALL PAYWALL. PARGON PARGON PARGON.

[–] Odo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Wait, is that an Eternal Darkness reference?

[–] bmsok@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I'm ok with scrolling past ads if they don't obstruct my user experience. But if they pop up and move the page around, I'm out.

I think that's the main reason many people have add blockers... Everything is either invasive or being used to track us to generate more clickbait that shove even more ads into our faces.

[–] CM400@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Pop ups are annoying on a traditional computer, but on touch interface devices they are pure evil.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Reuters just asks for a sign up which is annoying but at least it’s free

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Papanca@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

Advertisements can be blocked or allowed. But my issue is with the secret tracking that goes on on most websites i encounter. I am willing to support good journalism, but i'm not willing to have my privacy invaded. Unfortunately, it is hard to separate them, because am i donating for good journalism, but also encouraging the tracking? When i donate, will they stop tracking me? Probably not.

[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 20 points 1 year ago

https://www.theguardian.com

Occasional pop-up suggesting you sign up and/or donate but you can just dismiss it.

Just write headlines like this and charge people extra if they want punctuation.

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't want to comment on entitlement because we're not all in the same place financially.

However it IS important to support good journalism and some nicer models are funding through taxes (public broadcasters) or subscriptions. Subscriptions aren't necessarily individual, and some are for through local libraries and universities.

Good journalism costs money, and it's one of the only things that give us a fighting chance towards fixing the problems around us. If news agencies run out of funding, then they switch to other models, or worse they get sold to some corporation and the coverage is controlled.

What you can do, depending on where you are in life:

  • financially: pay for subscriptions, or donate what is reasonable
  • whitelist advertisements on good sites
  • advocate for public funding and pooled subscriptions

Piracy / filter blockers will be around, so if all else fails just read the stories to learn and grow as a person. You can contribute and advocate someday

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

whitelist advertisements on good sites

Stupid question, but does that generate any benefit for the platform even if you don't click the ads?

Even if I see an ad for something I'm interested in, I'll act on that by looking the item in question up on a search engine or YouTube or something - never by clicking the ad, as that's always felt like risky browsing behavior in terms of opening the doors to malware.

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

Fair question, I think it depends

Sites also have control over the types of ads they show, so sites with harmful ads should be blocked anyways

[–] flumph@programming.dev 15 points 1 year ago

The Internet: "If you're not paying, you're the product, not the customer." The Internet: "Ads suck! We're going to block them."

Content Providers: "OK, we're going to charge to pay for our bills then."

The Internet: "HOW DARE YOU?"

[–] Toneswirly@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

No one source is useful in a vacuum: you need to Investigate and Interrogate all media to form a clearer picture. So if I gotta shell out 100s of dollars to get that... well I'm just gonna disconnect entirely.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I like to say long run-on sentences like it's a bad English dub over really old Japanese animation. Then I downvote.

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Are you being funny on purpose?

[–] DarkThoughts@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] robocall@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can't read Reuters links on my mobile because they keep demanding I provide my email. I can still view Reuters articles on my desktop without providing email. I'm not sure why it works on desktop and not on mobile. I refuse to link Reuters articles to Lemmy now.

[–] usrchexout@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Refuse my man... anyway the reason between the platform wonkiness is their target demo are normies using phones. So avoiding the restriction on PC is just them not coding it to be restricted on PC platform.

Many such cases. Normies love their mobile doom scrolling lives

[–] Kissaki@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] rob299@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

seems interesting, a news source from Germany. I'l bookmark it and check it out.

[–] orbital@infosec.pub 3 points 1 year ago
[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I really don't mind paying for good commentary and objective news, not corporate propaganda. Instead I seek foreign and objective independent sources that provide real information to temper the MSM noise.

load more comments
view more: next ›