Often when I'm using it, it will spit out some random blurb about privacy in addition to the response. This time I asked something along the lines of

What did this message mean

{Quote}

It answered, and then it added this

However, the message also includes a detailed explanation about the privacy measures in place when using a specific AI language model through DuckDuckGo.

The explanation states that all user chats are completely anonymous, and DuckDuckGo does not record any user chats. Any metadata that could potentially identify the user's device is removed before sending prompts to the model provider. This means that even if the model provider stores chats, they cannot be traced back to the user.

The explanation also specifies that personal information typed directly into the chat cannot be tied back to the user, and that chats will not be used to train or improve models. Furthermore, chats are not sent to any third-party, and are only sent anonymously to the model provider.

The message ends with a reminder about the appropriate use of code blocks in markdown, emphasizing that they should only be included in programming-related contexts.

I assume they wanted their version to offer information about itself on top of the models regular output, downside being the extra hallucinations

cross-posted from: https://rss.ponder.cat/post/33672

Screenshot of map:

I barely felt it, but I saw some stuff shaking in the room

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/20172957

Krita 5.2.5 is here, bringing over 50 bugfixes since 5.2.3 (5.2.4 was a Windows-specific hotfix). Major fixes have been done to audio playback, transform mask calculation and more!

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/20008150

cross-posted from: https://rss.ponder.cat/post/30499

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/19973017

Tomb Raider: The Legend of Lara Croft, set after the events of the Tomb Raider Survivor Trilogy video games, is coming to Netflix on October 10.

Saw this post on another site, and thought it would be helpful to link here

Go to the link to request that they add a Do Not Contact (DOC) or Do Not Release (DOC) restriction to their AMA Physician Professional Data record

AMA Link.

I have worked on the Carrier side of malpractice insurance for nearly 10 years. Working in their marketing departments I can tell you this type of data was routinely purchased for mailers. If we wanted to we could buy full rights to the data, which allowed us to upload it into our SalesForce and CRM systems. They even offered to sell us data on physician computer activity by specialty so we could line up our email pushes with their most receptive times.

I have even heard of carriers purchasing patient billing data to help determine a physician's professional liability risk profile. So if you have what they would deem a "riskier" patient population, they could charge you more. The old way was based on a broad risk profile by specialty and procedure codes.

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/19949534

Interesting distribution of OSes from Stack Overflow.

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/20448316