this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2023
134 points (95.3% liked)

World News

39046 readers
3738 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] xkforce@lemmy.world 56 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The excuse for that during WWII was that we couldnt really guide bombs very well. That doesnt really fly when you can thread a bomb through the eye of a needle. And 10,000+ dead civilians in a matter of days isnt an acceptable price to pay even if it did.

[–] chaogomu@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Here's a point that is not at all relevant to the purposeful annihilation of Gaza, but "smart" munitions, are still far less accurate than military cheerleaders let on.

Those "thread a needle" bombs are great when they work, but often don't.

I mean, 90% of the time you can still hit the right building with one, but the correct window? Maybe.

See, the issue is, these are single use devices, built by the lowest bidder. They require high precision in their manufacture, and then need fairly good weather conditions and a well painted target. Otherwise, they miss. Usually, that miss is "Close enough", i.e. the blast of the exploding munition will still take out the target (and maybe something nearby that you didn't want to hit) Sometimes that target is mostly fine and a building a block over is the one you hit.

All of this is when the intel is actually good. Usually it's not. "Smart" bombs can only ever be as smart as the people firing them.

The caveat here is drones. Drones have the option to linger in the air before approaching a target, so they generally only hit targets that are selected. Which then goes back to the issue of intelligence, and the stunning lack thereof in most military engagements.

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 54 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Two wrongs don't make a right Israel.

[–] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 4 points 1 year ago

Israel? More like Iswrongl!

[–] MxM111@kbin.social -4 points 1 year ago

Actually, it does. It is clearly not left Israel.

[–] TheBananaKing@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago

That didn’t happen.

And if it did, it wasn’t that bad.

And if it was, that’s not a big deal.

And if it is, that’s not my fault.

And if it was, I didn’t mean it.

And if I did, you deserved it.

And if you didn't, I'm not the only one doing it <--- YOU ARE HERE

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago

The smart thing to do when someone makes a mistake is to try to learn from it, not double down

[–] spittingimage@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I need to find the album of these

[–] presbypenguin@reddthat.com 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] TheDankHold@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

You’re my hero

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago
[–] spittingimage@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I just google for 'em based on the name of the fallacy.

[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 24 points 1 year ago

It's refreshing to see the "I know you are but what am I" level of argument at world scale and on the topic of war crimes

[–] stella@lemm.ee 22 points 1 year ago

Alright. I'll be sure to let the children know.

USA: "Hey Israel, can you stop killing so many people?" Israel:"no, you" USA: "here is 5 more billion dollars"

[–] Caligvla@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hey Israel? Might not be the wisest to bite the hand that feeds you, just saying...

[–] No_Eponym@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

American president supports Israel

American president's polls decline over supporting Israel

Israel is criticised

Israel criticises America to deflect blame

It’s a bold move Cotton, let’s see if it pays off.

[–] _xDEADBEEF@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah. I see they've fallen to Russian propagandist level of arguments.

[–] DoomBot5@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago

Actually, it's the pro Palestinian level of argument. Their usual MO has always been out of context numbers.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 1 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The questions over whether Israel is violating laws of war intensified last week after warplanes dropped at least two 2,000-pound bombs — among the largest in the country’s arsenal — on the Jabaliya neighborhood, killing dozens of people and injuring hundreds, most from refugee families.

“Israel dropping several large bombs in the middle of a densely populated refugee camp was completely and predictably going to lead to a significant and disproportionate loss of civilian life and therefore a war crime,” Kenneth Roth, the former executive director of Human Rights Watch and a visiting professor at Princeton University, wrote online.

The Geneva Conventions, the widely accepted basis for international humanitarian law and codes of warfare, were adopted in 1949 with the aim of preventing governments from inflicting the level of mass casualties of World War II.

Israeli officials say they take extensive measures to protect civilians, including by dropping leaflets or making radio and television broadcasts and even phone calls urging residents to leave danger zones ahead of some attacks.

One benchmark that Israel considers relevant was introduced by a United Nations investigation of civilian deaths during the 1999 NATO bombing campaign over Kosovo, whose aim was to protect ethnic Albanians from attacks by Serbian forces.

Mr. Paul, the former State Department official, was a longtime employee in the agency’s political-military bureau, which handles weapons sales, until last month, when he resigned because of what he said was immoral U.S. support and lethal aid for Israel’s bombings in Gaza.


The original article contains 2,153 words, the summary contains 248 words. Saved 88%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!