this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2023
120 points (98.4% liked)

World News

39023 readers
2480 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ConfusedMeAgain@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Wow, a huge drop in the last 15 years. I find it interesting what governments are trying to do to encourage higher birth rates (I think South Korea and Japan try to promote more as wel). I understand it's good for economics but the environmentalist in me is relieved at the thought of fewer people on the planet.

[–] febra@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Nothing. They'll do nothing. They will keep protecting their billionaire owners while young people struggle to make ends meet. Then they'll wonder why no one is having kids

[–] elouboub@kbin.social 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The State proposes to cover up to 3,000 euros a year in social-security contributions for working mothers with two children, with the youngest being under 10, and those with three children or more, with the youngest up to 18

Hilarious that they think that's enough.

[–] eee@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

Soon the boomer cry will go from "nobody wants to work" to "nobody wants to have kids"

[–] chepox@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I guess this is going to be like when flights get oversold. They will start offering $. But then as the flight nears take off they offer $$$ then a few minutes before $$$$$$ +free flight + dinner + hotel +...

It may be too late by then. Declining population problems are not lineal but geometric in growth (or decline) so increasing incentives later on, even if effective may be too late to stop the decline. This is a much more serious issue than most people believe. And it is also quite time sensitive.

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I suppose perperual growth is not good either, so what is actually the ideal? To stabilize the population numbers? And at what point?

[–] Nudding@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

It's great for the planet.

[–] febra@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yet the Italian government still isn't offering any realistic solutions. They keep attacking the LGBTQ community because apparently they're the cause for a lack of new births. What they don't do is attack their rich billionaire owners that keep young people poor, and are in turn actually the cause for such low birth rates. Go figure why young people won't have kids. No one can afford it.

[–] MilitantAtheist@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago
[–] frequenttimetraveler@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Interesting that the same record happened in neighbouring greece. Interesting to see if there are regional dynamics in this? Humans are influenced by their physical surrounding

[–] itscozydownhere@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We just have very low paychecks and you can’t really afford to have children unless you accept to have a shitty life. I didn’t for example. Freedom and money? Sign me up for that shit

[–] frequenttimetraveler@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's a common justification given, but it's not true. The same happened in almost every advanced european society in the 80s, when things weren't unaffordable. Urbanization is probably the largest contributor to this, because children are absolutely optional in city dwellers.

We should stop pretending we can reverse this trend, and the whole doom-saying around it. Instead southern europe needs to plan for the medium-term future, which necessarily include the transformation/abolition of the unsustainable welfare state paradigm built in the 80s.

[–] gastationsushi@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Nah, the only unsubstainable welfare in a liberal democracy is welfare for the donor class.

[–] itscozydownhere@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Oh I completely agree and am happy population is reducing. But Italy’s cities are not getting bigger and most people live in suburban/agricultural areas. We are a very fragmented country made by thousands of small towns with a few thousands inhabitants and that didn’t change. There is no help for families with children and house/rent prices are high, it’s just hard.

[–] eee@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Surprise, humans are also influenced by whether they can afford a house and kids on a single income.

Housing definitely plays a role. Or to be more precise, the culture of housing in your neighborhood.

If we all moved near the romani shantytowns, our birth rate would skyrocket 10x