this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2023
131 points (91.2% liked)

World News

39019 readers
2910 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] filister@lemmy.world 70 points 1 year ago (3 children)

They do have a plan, but it doesn't include finding a peaceful solution and a path to long standing peace.

[–] Risk@feddit.uk 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yup, the Israeli State does not give a single shit about innocent Palestinians. They're quite happy to continue oppressing them, because when the oppressed 'suddenly' become radicalised and fight back it gives the Israeli State an excellent excuse to take more land and displace more Palestinians.

Israel is showing the world it's not trying to be an apartheid state, but a genocidal one.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Anyone who thinks Israelis differentiate between Palestinians and Hamas terrorists is dreaming. It’s one people against another. If anything the Israelis lump all Palestinians together AND the Arabs in the region.

[–] Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well if everyone is dead then there is peace right /s

[–] phthalocyanin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

"negative peace "

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] luthis@lemmy.nz 39 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We all know what the endgame is.

[–] JoeHill@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] zik@zorg.social 49 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

The Gaza strip ceases to exist when it's taken by force and "settlers" move in so it becomes part of Israel. Millions of Palestinians die in refugee camps.

[–] dontcarebear@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Let me explain Benjamin Netanyahu.

He is a Machiavellian criminal (I repeat this definition because if you read "the Prince" then you know exactly how he will act):

He has 0 issues with behading children. However, if he gets to stay in power for another 4 years, he will let Hamas behead the whole country.

The war crime of ethnically cleansing Gaza will harm him politically and empower his psycho right winged pals.

It is not in his favor, so it will not happen.

P.S. fucker should rot in prison.

[–] JoeHill@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Taken by force? It was taken by force 56 years ago. Since then the Palestinian population in Gaza has increased about 7-fold.

And there were already Israeli settlements there. They were dismantled in 2005 and the settlers forcibly removed by Sharon’s government.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Yea, but Sharon was a lot more sane than bibi... it seems like that asshole has done everything in their power to roll those changes back.

[–] JoeHill@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are we talking about the same Sharon that Palestinians hold responsible for the Sabra and Shatila massacre? And the same Sharon whose visit to Al-Aqsa was rightly or wrongly said to be the proximate cause of the Second Intifada (and which ultimately allowed him to come to power)? The same Sharon who built the wall between the West Bank beyond the Green Line effectively annexing large chunks of land in all but name? That Sharon? Just want to make sure that we’re talking about the same guy

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

Yup, much more sane than Netanyahu.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dx1@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It was under Israeli occupation following the Six-Day War until the PNA was given a kind of on-paper authority over it according to the Oslo Accords (which, along with the EUBAM agreements and such, basically gave Israel full siege power over Gaza on all sides). It's a whopping 141 square miles, I don't know what pointing to a population increase is supposed to demonstrate.

The situation before October 7th was that of a clear division between Palestinian population inside the Gaza strip and Israeli population to the north and east. Now:

Israeli minister without portfolio Gideon Sa'ar told Channel 12 News that Gaza "must be smaller at the end of the war" and that "there should be an area that is classified as a security zone where whoever enters is intercepted." He added: "We must make the end of our campaign clear to everyone around us. Whoever starts a war against Israel must lose territory."[260][261]

In the context of several past instances where Israel has, in order: (a) claimed a territory citing military purposes (b) settlements were built on the military area (c) claimed the area as its own land because it has Israeli settlements on it - we have absolutely no reason to expect otherwise, particularly given that figures in the Israeli government and media *have been explicitly calling for this:

https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2023/10/un-expert-warns-new-instance-mass-ethnic-cleansing-palestinians-calls

She noted that Israeli public officials have openly advocated for another Nakba, the term for the events of 1947-1949 when over 750,000 Palestinians were expelled from their homes and lands during the hostilities that led to the establishment of the State of Israel. The Naksa, which led to Israel’s occupation of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip in 1967, displaced 350,000 Palestinians.

https://english.alarabiya.net/News/middle-east/2023/10/08/Israeli-Knesset-member-calls-for-second-Nakba-amid-ongoing-conflict-with-Hamas

Israeli member of Knesset Ariel Kallner on Sunday called for a second ‘Nakba’ to take place in Gaza amid ongoing armed conflict between Hamas and the Israeli army.

“Right now, one goal: Nakba! A Nakba that will overshadow the Nakba of 48. Nakba in Gaza and Nakba to anyone who dares to join! their Nakba, because like then in 1948, the alternative is clear,” Kallner wrote on X, formerly known as Twitter.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MxM111@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

So, for execution of this plan they gave to sector Gaza autonomy and removed (forcefully) Jewish settlements from there. Yeah. Totally makes sense.

[–] luthis@lemmy.nz 14 points 1 year ago

Other commenters have added good answers, basically the strong feeling everywhere is this won't stop until Hamas is utterly wiped out, and by that time Gaza will be too and it's inhabitants either destroyed or refugeed out.

[–] hightrix@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Annihilation.

[–] febra@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago

The plan: more settlements, more oppression, more land grabs.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

FYI - Getting lots of reports on comments in this thread. We are currently reviewing and re-writing the rules in the Sidebar so I'm choosing to not remove any of them YET. That's not to say it won't happen LATER.

I don't want to put anyone in a position where something would be removed under the old rules, but not the new rules or vice versa.

Be aware, things are changing. Hopefully in the next 24 hours.

Until then, Wheaton's Rule: Don't be a dick.

Also, Downvote is not an "I disagree button", it's a "this comment doesn't contribute to the discussion, we are all dumber for having heard it, I award you no points button".

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

FTA:

"Israel has called up a record 360,000 reservists"

Gaza has 365 square kilometers. 141 square miles.

https://www.britannica.com/summary/Gaza-Strip

That seems like an awful lot of soldiers to square meters.

[–] JoeHill@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You do realize that this is likely to become a 3 front war. Lebanon in the north. And Bibi has to cowtow to his settler base in the West Bank.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I could definitely see that, Israel has not been shy about invading Southern Lebanon in the past.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_occupation_of_Southern_Lebanon

[–] dontcarebear@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Also, a united military front won't protest, rebel or put Benjamin Netanyahu in jail.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And one of those fronts will effectively be with iran. You seriously don't want to fuck with the resources they have to throw into war.

[–] Risk@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I wonder whether Iran can actually spare an outright war. There is clearly a lot of anti-government energy flowing in Iran, and that won't have been stamped out by their crackdown on it.

I wonder whether most everyday Iranians would support a war with Israel.

Granted, it's not likely Iran gets directly involved - they'll just drive their Hezbollah prop.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

I wonder whether Iran can actually spare an outright war. There is clearly a lot of anti-government energy flowing in Iran, and that won’t have been stamped out by their crackdown on it.

I guess it depends on how much the "helping our fellow Muslims" stuff works. I know it would in Egypt at least.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Iran wouldn't need to radically shift their budget... the revolutionary guard gets buckets of oil money and maintains a constant high state of readiness.

[–] fosforus@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yeah, Russia's initial push against all of Ukraine was reportedly about 100-200k soldiers.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I think that was a little bit different in that a) everyone (the West included!) expected Ukraine to just roll over, and b) a lot of those troops weren't told they were actually going to war, they thought it was just a training mission... the poor bastards.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/mar/04/russian-soldiers-ukraine-anger-duped-into-war

Israeli troops aren't under any illusion about what they're doing.

[–] fbmac@lemmy.fbmac.net 10 points 1 year ago (8 children)

I'd like a single atheist state where Palestine and Israeli have equal rights but religion is strictly outlawed. But I wouldn't kill people to achieve that, so I think my endgame isn't gonna happen

[–] Spzi@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

But I wouldn’t kill people to achieve that, so I think my endgame isn’t gonna happen

Yes, since both other sides have extremists which aren't happy with any compromise. On both sides, they are in the government. On both sides, they are willing to kill for it, even seeing it as their religious duty. So if you're unwilling to kill and prefer another scenario, you will most definitely not get it and maybe get killed in the process. The region might have reached it's nash equilibrium in constant war.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 5 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


DUBAI/WASHINGTON, Oct 18 (Reuters) - Israel is vowing to wipe out Hamas in a relentless onslaught on the Gaza Strip but has no obvious endgame in sight, with no clear plan for how to govern the ravaged Palestinian enclave even if it triumphs on the battlefield.

Codenamed "Operation Swords of Iron", the military campaign will be unmatched in its ferocity and unlike anything Israel has carried out in Gaza in the past, according to eight regional and Western officials with knowledge of the conflict who declined to be named due to the sensitivity of the matter.

The immediate Israeli strategy, said three regional officials familiar with discussions between the U.S. and Middle Eastern leaders, is to destroy Gaza's infrastructure, even at the cost of high civilian casualties, push the enclave's people towards the Egyptian border and go after Hamas by blowing up the labyrinth of underground tunnels the group has built to conduct its operations.

Aaron David Miller, a Middle East expert at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said Biden's visit would have given him a chance to press Israeli leader Benjamin Netanyahu to think through issues such as the proportional use of force and the longer-term plans for Gaza before any invasion.

Two regional military experts told Reuters that Hamas' armed wing, the Ezzedine al-Qassam Brigades, has mobilised for an invasion, setting up anti-tank mines and booby-trapped explosive devices to ambush troops.

Hundreds of Palestinians have died in the West Bank since the start of the year in repeated clashes with Israeli soldiers and settlers, and there is widespread concern that the violence might engulf the territory as nearby Gaza burns.


The original article contains 1,314 words, the summary contains 273 words. Saved 79%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

load more comments
view more: next ›