this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2023
1374 points (97.5% liked)

ADHD memes

8328 readers
1424 users here now

ADHD Memes

The lighter side of ADHD


Rules

  1. No Party Pooping

Other ND communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zak8022@lemm.ee 86 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I do this so much at work and have to constantly remind myself not to overdo it (otherwise people will think I’m crazy).

[–] Alteon@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I've learned to back off and realize that commas, instead of parentheses, often work just fine.

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 29 points 1 year ago (4 children)

But I've already used commas to add more information to the sentence, how can I fit in more information without parentheses?

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 26 points 1 year ago

Stand over the person reading it and interject.

[–] hayes_@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Consider the humble “em dash” — some people use it to interject a completely different sentence in the middle of another — the next time you’re trying to avoid parentheses.

[–] mihnt@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Forget what everyone else said. Brackets.

[–] phcorcoran@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

You can, although probably should not, use semicolons; they can be used to join related statements that could, very frequently, also stand on their own.

[–] Zak8022@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yea I try to do that too. And then make sure it doesn’t end up a ridiculous run on sentence. 😭

[–] z500@startrek.website 6 points 1 year ago

Just introduce yourself to people as a 19th century German philosopher, they'll understand.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Psythik@lemm.ee 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Occasionally replace the parenthesis with a semicolon – or dashes – and you can get away with it more often.

[–] Ulvain@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The thing is - and I say that from experience (being somewhat on the ADHD spectrum myself) - that there are no limits to how many of these you can use; or at least that's how it feels to me (sorry!).

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Classy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

I am guilty of overusing em dashes — I just think they're aesthetically pleasing, even if they're often unnecessary.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] sock@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

im like small sentence (heres some back story though (and some deeper context thats needed (also something vaguely related to thing))).

[–] arkh2183@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

Usually by my third edit I’m ready to send. Of course, by then I’ve begun to question if anyone is interested in my option anyway and why am I sending this email? They probably know all this already and I’m too stupid to have realized it.

[–] Faceman2K23@discuss.tchncs.de 42 points 1 year ago (2 children)

oh god I do this all the time, excessively, and have to rewrite emails and posts multiple times to get rid of them as much as possible. sometimes I'll be writing a parenthetical and need to nest others within it..

It's hard.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"Nested Parentheticals" can totally be the title of my 15,000 word autobiography. lol

[–] Faceman2K23@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 year ago

{Nested [Parentheticals] - (An Autobiography), By Admiral Patrick}

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Smoregoose@lemmy.blahaj.zone 37 points 1 year ago (4 children)

It gets fun when the side thought is longer than the original and starts getting side thoughts of its own. The context needs more context or nobody will get it.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Matombo@feddit.de 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fuck (Well happens to me (sometimes even nested))

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Linus Torvalds used nested parentheses in his famous Linux announcement email (1991-08-25) so I think precedent says they're OK.

Hello everybody out there using minix - / I'm doing a (free) operating system (just a hobby, won't be big and professional like gnu) for 386(486) AT clones. This has been brewing since april, and is starting to get ready. I'd like any feedback on things people like/dislike in minix, as my OS resembles it somewhat (same physical layout of the file-system (due to practical reasons) among other things). / I've currently ported bash(1.08) and gcc(1.40), and things seem to work. This implies that I'll get something practical within a few months, and I'd like to know what features most people would want. Any suggestions are welcome, but I won't promise I'll implement them :-) / Linus (torvalds@kruuna.helsinki.fi) / PS. Yes - it's free of any minix code, and it has a multi-threaded fs. It is NOT portable (uses 386 task switching etc), and it probably never will support anything other than AT-harddisks, as that's all I have :-(. / — Linus Torvalds

[–] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Nested parenthesis is fairly common in most programming languages.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I like to use ellipses cause I never fully finish a thought…

[–] j_roby@slrpnk.net 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Stahhhp... I do that a lot more that parentheses, and now you've made me self-conscious about it lol

load more comments (1 replies)

The other day I wrote a sentence with parenthesis and inside the parenthesis there was a comma phrase, a dash, a colon, and a semicolon on here. Only realized how much of a monstrosity the comment was after writing it, but posted it anyways.

[–] jwagner7813@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] whofearsthenight@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

Me (check my comment history.)

[–] MargotRobbie@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I do it quite often here and I think of them as footnotes to my writing, because they are tangential thoughts, but still important to what I'm trying to express that it shouldn't be considered a bonus: the asides are more like a public "note to self".

It also makes the writing feel more raw and stream of conscience-y. (I don't have a better word to describe it.)

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Gestrid@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 year ago

And then the bonus content comes with its own bonus content (which also comes with its own bonus content [and so on]).

[–] Kuma@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Is this an adhd thing?! I haven't been diagnosed but this community makes me think too many times "i thought it was just me".

Because of the tweet did i have to remove my bonus thought it felt unnatural in this context 😂

Back on track: Sometimes do i want to add a parentes in a parents and it hurts every time.

[–] vithigar@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No. A lot of "ADHD thing" tweets/memes are just quirks common across a wide spectrum of people. That they happen to also be common in those with ADHD is just coincidental.

For parentheses specifically, it's just a personal writing habit, and there are other ways to communicate "a thought followed by a bonus thought" without having to use them — hell, parenthetical clauses themselves don't have to use them. Parentheses in particular are probably a result of some people being taught that "a sentence is a complete thought", which is a nice description for someone just learning grammar, but also not actually true.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dylanTheDeveloper@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Do you inhale when you breathe? It's a common ADHD symptom

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LynneOfFlowers@midwest.social 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's all I can do not to nest them 🙃

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] PR3CiSiON@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

I always wish it was easy to "hyperlink" parts of my sentence. So that they could hover over it and see my explanation for that part. But alas, that would be too much work.

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 year ago

Is this one a common trait? I love writing, but I have to constantly rewrite because every sentence uses parenthetical tangents.

[–] Captain_Waffles@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] slander@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

ha ha I do that

[–] negativeyoda@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Fuck. I go into parenthesis, then brackets, and I've even gone into curly brackets before.

This is a thing, eh?

And ellipsis…because there’s always more and we don’t want to stop.

[–] Zoroastyyr@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I thought this was just me. I’ve been saying that a lot lately.

[–] Aermis@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I do this in almost everything I write out (almost, somethings don't need clarification).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I do that all the time- although I often prefer hyphenated clauses (because they look classier)- but I also use a lot of parenthetical phrases (I don't think I have ADHD, but my daughter does).

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Something something genetics, something something neurodivergent overlap.

Its entirely possible for a ND to live with no notable issues or disadvantages which negates the need for a label or diagnosis but if your daughter does have one the chance is high for their to be neurodivergent genes all around you in your family gene-pool.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Addv4@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't forget braces {} if you have an especially rambling sub thought.

[–] j_roby@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Anytime I get to a point where I even need to consider using braces or brackets, I know that's when I need to rewrite the whole thought lol

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] steeznson@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

A semi-colon would have been more appropriate in this context (but less ironic)

load more comments
view more: next ›