540
all 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] skooma_king@lemm.ee 54 points 1 year ago

Call me a peasant any day cause overnight oats are delicious. Here’s my recipe you are now asking yourselves for: 1/4 cup steel cut oats, 1 Tbsp chia seeds, a glob of honey, 1/8 tsp salt, 1/4 tsp cinnamon, 3/4 cup of milk, then in the morning add 1/4 cup crushed walnuts and a ton of blueberries.

Now if you’ll excuse me, it’s gruel o’clock for this peasant.

[-] julianschmulian@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 1 year ago

pro tip: try frozen berries and add them the night before to infuse the oats with berry juice. which is also practical because you can mix all together the night before in a to go jar and in the morning you don‘t waste any time and can get right to slaving away for our feudal overlords

[-] Jessvj93@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And the quick and dirty recipe:

Maple and Brown Sugar Oats

  • Oats
  • Hot Water
  • Brown Sugar
  • Maple syrup
  • Pinch of Salt

Doing this to Farina also makes Malt O' Meal - Brown Sugar version

[-] Geth@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

Sorry, but this one is just oats with sugar while the one above actually has fruit and nuts for that healthy boost.

[-] oce@jlai.lu 3 points 1 year ago
[-] Anamana@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

american version ;)

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I'll just stick with the kind I can microwave in a couple of minutes.

[-] pixxelkick@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

The thing is, the need for large expansive homes have substantially evaporated in younger generations as technology advances.

The desire for a massive home as a well off (not wealthy, but above peasant) person was due to:

  1. Needing somewhere to store all your necessary shit, your tools of your trade, etc etc.

  2. Needing somewhere for your servant(s) to live, because they took care of the house for you

  3. Somewhere to store all your books and other pleasantries

However, our servants are now tiny little robots that dont need to eat or sleep, they dont need an entire bedroom and seat at the table.

The entire knowledge of all of humanity no longer requires a library of alexandria, but instead can fit in your pocket.

Many folks have all the tools of their trade able to fit in a small laptop bag at most.

When you can largely fit all your requirements of modern life in a single cardboard box, as opposed to needing several rooms, the desire for a mansion dwindles. Entire kitchens have been replaced with a single microwave and a hotplate.

Meals that used to take an entire day and a whole kitchen staff to prepare, now take a single person hitting an on button.

We have VR, laptops, netflix, the entire internet, etc etc all at our fingertips.

And most importantly, we have cars and whatnot. A trip to the store is no longer a "wake up at 6 in the morning to get the horses saddled and hitched, then three hour ride into town, get back home just before sunset" affair.

It's now "hop in the car and drive over to the store in 10 minutes"

And unlike horses, a car doesnt need a whole ass stable and stablehand. It can just... sit there lol

So yeah, its perfectly reasonable for us to slowly revert back to small life, everything we could possibly need to live life can fit in an extremely small square footage now, theres literally no need to have a giant mansion, it's largely pointless.

[-] Goodtoknow@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 year ago

In most towns and cities, grocery store should be within walkable distance to allow people to get what they need for the next day or two, removing the necessity for large pantries or food storage rooms. Also getting benefits of eating healthier and fresher.

[-] drekly@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Is this astroturfing?

Of course I want more space! small rooms with a small number of rooms is claustrophobic and cluttered. I need space for me and all my shit!

[-] Sotuanduso@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Just do make sure that, if you live in a small home, you spend some time out in the town, because living in too little space can harm your feels.

[-] greenskye@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

I wish houses weren't required by law to have a lawn. I could save so much space if I didn't have one and all the junk to take care of it.

[-] drekly@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

This thread blows my mind.

You'd prefer to just be boxed in with people all around you and concrete everywhere? That's what developers would do if they weren't required by law to give you space. Pack them into smaller spaces and get more money!

[-] frogfruit@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

You could look into lawn alternatives. Here the rules are no weeds and vegetation can't be over 6 inches unless it is intentionally cultivated. So I have native plants in garden beds around my house that take up roughly 50% of the yard, and the "lawn" portion is mostly native groundcovers that are unlikely to reach above 6 inches. I rarely have to do anything to it since it's mostly native. We go out there maybe once a month to mow the little grass that's left (which we're phasing out as natives spread) and pull weeds.

It was a little more work up front to make beds and plant natives, but we did it the lazy way, starting out small and expanding over the years as natives grew and spread. We did temporary borders of cardboard with rocks on top to smother grass and expand out as needed.

[-] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 13 points 1 year ago

If you call it “oat milk”, you can sell gruel at a steep markup.

[-] Kage520@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Isn't dairy subsidized to make it so cheap?

[-] abies_exarchia@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago

Serfs had The Commons. We don’t even have that

[-] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.de 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I won't stand for slandering overnight oats like that!

edit: how tf did I mess up my comment so badly.

[-] negativenull@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

overnight oats are delicious

[-] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 year ago

Basically true, but consider the alternative. Given how expensive things are now, if you don't live a very minimal lifestyle you are going to be much more trapped in your career than someone who does. You won't be able to retire early, you won't be able to switch to something lower paid but more enjoyable/laid back, you won't have the means to take some time off to pursue your own business ideas or just dealing with life stuff.

If you're dead set on living the "American Dream" or something and refuse to hold back on treating yourself with luxuries, you are going to end up being even more of a tool of your technofeudalist masters. Acknowledging that doesn't mean turning a blind eye to what is happening, it's just basic self preservation of your freedom.

[-] Mango@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

This is actually why I won't even bother doing higher tier jobs. Being owned by my boss is not going to make me happy.

[-] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago

The problem is that more and more the tiny house and so forth is no longer a choice, but a neccessity to survive. In places like Silicon Valley a normal job basicly forces you to either communte for hours every day or live in a tiny house just to survive. Looking at the rent increases and high home prices combined with high intrest rates, the cost of housing looks like it will grow in the coming years. That is not just a US problem, but the case in many parts of the developed world. In poorer countries it is a reality for even longer and for even more people.

That being said, if you have the choice, building up some wealth is certainly a good idea. With a bit of it and some good ideas, it becomes much easier to drop out a bit out of the capitalist hellscape and avoid the worst problems.

[-] zephyreks@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

Technofeudalism is just endgame capitalism

[-] irmoz@reddthat.com 6 points 1 year ago

There's no point renaming capitalism

[-] krolden@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

Capitalism is just an extension of feudalism already. There was no transition

[-] kursis@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago

Well not really, but I get what you mean! As one German guy wrote long ago - it is always a class struggle. And I'm writing this as a person who knows how shit the communism was. No matter the system, there will always be someone who exploits it and someone trying and being in charge. Even in Anarchism, everyone then tries to be in charge, even if just over themselves.

[-] negativenull@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago
[-] kursis@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 year ago

I think this is very toxic post. I live in apartment in a size of tiny house, and I have no wish to move to suburbs and slave away my life in traffic jams. People should live in a way that they enjoy. Comparing is just a dick measuring contest. And One should be able to enjoy his mega mansion and his huge truck if he wants to too, providing it is done in environmentally safe way and all the taxes (and I mean appropriately and proportionally calculated taxes) are paid

[-] Tikiporch@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

It's hard to take this seriously when you shit on living in the suburbs then immediately say "people should live in a way they enjoy".

[-] kursis@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago

I'm not shitting on suburbs. I don't like them though. And I don't just say “people should live in a way they enjoy”. If you would avoid twisting the words and reading until the end You would notice a whole sentence saying: "And One should be able to enjoy his mega mansion and his huge truck if he wants to too, providing it is done in environmentally safe way and all the taxes (and I mean appropriately and proportionally calculated taxes) are paid". If, by any chance, you are still reading, let me say that we are free to define the system of living in any way we want. And If you can find a way to do what you like in a way that is safe, constructive and not infringing on our planet and society - go for it!

[-] TomJoad@lemmy.tf 3 points 1 year ago

Respectfully - I don’t see how mega-mansions and huge-trucks could be considered ‘environmentally safe’.

And people should also consider the “social-impact of earning”…

since most mansion-owners “leeched” their money via white-collar jobs at exploitative corporations.

…In my opinion - the entire downstream effect of our choices must be considered.

(I write this in the spirit of unified awareness - I know you aren’t pushing for mansions or trucks)

[-] kursis@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago

I think You can have a huge house if You build it smart. Like 100 m long earth ship or something like that. I was a bit iffy about trucks though wen I wrote this, so I know what you mean. But if you scale back to normal not Murican size car/truck and go hydrogen or electric, it is still bad, but better than I can realistically hope for with current trends. I agree with your opinion about jobs. I feel that big corporations are allowed too much free space to do what they want. I love to see innovation that big resources can bring, but it is always being overshadowed by their exploitation and lobbying in self interest. There is not enough control and they always end up exploiting their position.

[-] roboticide@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Agreed. One could generously give the OP the benefit of the doubt that the intent of the post is a complaint about the system, but it's fundamentally flawed as it's still an attack on the "victim" of said system.

Who are they, to tell people what to eat or what size house to live in? As long as people have the choice of food they want or home they want, that's all that matters. Work needs to be done to make those choices equitable, but even in an equitable system there would still be tradeoffs. I just bought a house a few years ago, it's in town, modest size (1800sq ft), and I have a 15 minute commute. I love it. My friends bought a house last year - huge, 3500 sq ft. Brand new, bit mcmansion-y, but it's a nice house, and they love it. We paid about the same price, because their house is in the middle of nowhere. If we bought a house near them, I'd have a 1+ hour commute one way each day, and I'd hate it. I like my hobbies, but I don't need that much space, lol.

And if someone is happy buying a tiny house, good for them. If someone doesn't need the space - doesn't have kids, has undemanding hobbies, isn't throwing a lot of parties, why would they need a bigger house? It's just more to maintain. This post is basically saying anyone who doesn't consume - buying bigger houses and a meat and eggs breakfast - is a victim, which is just stupid. And it'd be great if tiny homes weren't one of the easiest ways out of the current rental nightmare, but some people would still choose tiny homes even if every house cost the same and renting didn't exist.

[-] kursis@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 year ago

I think You hit a nail on it's head saying " This post is basically saying anyone who doesn’t consume - buying bigger houses and a meat and eggs breakfast - is a victim, which is just stupid". I agree.

[-] MxM111@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

Slaves cannot be fired. They have to be sold.

[-] BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

Ever heard of share cropping? How about debt bondage or wage slavery? Slavery takes many forms. Very few include open air slave markets.

Also, this post is about peasants. While they were certainly a form of slave, particularly serfs, I have a suspicion you didn't know that and didn't intend to equivocate the two. Peasants weren't really bought or sold either. I'm sure it happened sometimes but it wasn't a structural component of feudalism.

All this to say, what's your point?

this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2023
540 points (97.2% liked)

solarpunk memes

2615 readers
790 users here now

For when you need a laugh!

The definition of a "meme" here is intentionally pretty loose. Images, screenshots, and the like are welcome!

But, keep it lighthearted and/or within our server's ideals.

Posts and comments that are hateful, trolling, inciting, and/or overly negative will be removed at the moderators' discretion.

Please follow all slrpnk.net rules and community guidelines

Have fun!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS