this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2025
592 points (98.7% liked)

News

24639 readers
4745 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Donald Trump mocked Time magazine after its latest cover depicted Elon Musk sitting behind the Resolute Desk, questioning if the magazine was “still in business.”

While pretending indifference, the cover likely irritated him, as he was ecstatic just months ago when Time named him 2024 Person of the Year.

Speaking at the White House, Trump tried to dismiss the cover’s implications and praised Musk for uncovering “fraud and corruption.”

Despite his criticism, Trump has long craved Time’s approval, even displaying a fake cover of himself.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] f4f4f4f4f4f4f4f4@sopuli.xyz 1 points 8 minutes ago* (last edited 7 minutes ago)

FREE SPEECH! FREE SPEECH! unless it's something I don't like

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 1 points 9 minutes ago

Dear Trump: You will never find true happiness, whacha gonna do? Cry about it.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 16 minutes ago

LOL, donvict is just such a predictable little butthurt baby.

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 33 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I wish the independent hadn't used such a high def photo of him-- you can really see all the nooks and crannies of his shit ass bronzer shotgun applicator. He looks so fucking old. I doubt he's making it through the next 4 years alive.

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 23 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

You'd think that, but these evil assholes seem to live forever.

[–] TheTurner@lemm.ee 15 points 14 hours ago

Yep. Kissinger was alive damn near a hundred years.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 200 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

hahaha! Grab him by the ego!

[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 56 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

when you're rich they let you

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 18 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

There is something truly next level about bragging to rich people about how much you enjoy something simple.

This comes to mind

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 13 minutes ago

Haha. Was he trying to fuck with Larry?

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 8 points 16 hours ago

That's hilarious, thank you for the laugh

[–] axx@slrpnk.net 23 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

No, he does not care at all. Nope. Doesn't care about what the media says. No bearing, none.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 8 minutes ago

This is the same guy that was beefing with Rosie O'Donnell for how long?

Oh, and still has an axe to grind with SPY magazine's founders, from shit they said about him in....checks calendar....the 80s?

Still whiny that Obama has a bigger crowd size than him.

I wonder if, like Hitler being a failed artist, if donvict had actually felt he was successful and actually accepted by most people that he looks up to (and they don't accept him, since he's a weird freak) if his life would have had a different turn. Maybe they should have given him some talk show on TV or radio and make him feel Bigly Important at various events where TMZ or whatever is there to fawn over him.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 14 points 17 hours ago

He handled it well in fact, saying he thought they Time was out of business, then complimenting Elon's performance in his role.

...the Liberal media painting this as a huge win, rather than honestly admitting "We're too scare to ask about Musk's conflicts of interests because we represent the same rich assholes ge does" is part of how they contribute to the disconnect between politics and reality... And it's part of how the election was lost, via sane washing, clickbaiting, and selective ignorance.

[–] keinBloudsinn@lemmings.world 55 points 17 hours ago

Journalist: "We have found reason to believe there may be a conflict of interest in the way SpaceX receives government funding!"

Official: "Nonsense! He is a brilliant entrepreneur, blessed by the free market!"

Journalist: "But if he receives government grants and also holds influence over government decisions, shouldn’t we at least investigate?"

Official: "Investigate? Are you mad? That’s not how modern governance works!"

Journalist: "How does it work?"

Official: "Well, if he weighs the same as a rocket... he's a genius!"

Crowd: "A genius!! Burn the critics!!"

Journalist: "But that doesn't make any sense!"

Official: "Look, strange billionaires distributing subsidies is no basis for a system of government! Supreme executive power derives from a mandate of regulatory oversight, not from handing out massive contracts to one's own companies!"

Journalist: "So you'll investigate?"

Official: "What? No! Now go away, or I shall dismiss you a second time!"

[–] Etterra 23 points 16 hours ago

Oh now that's funny.

[–] Emberleaf@lemmy.ml 53 points 19 hours ago (4 children)

LOL....this is glorious! Elon's firing to commence in T minus 10....9.....8........

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 64 points 19 hours ago

Elon is already gearing up to fire Trump? Damn, that was quick.

[–] Punchshark@lemmy.ca 30 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

One can hope, but doubtful

[–] Emberleaf@lemmy.ml 15 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

The exact same scenario played out with Steve Bannon, and Trump fired him. I'm don't see Elon faring much better.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 26 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

Musk and some more background people likely saved the Trump campaign from financial ruin. He couldn't be rid of them if he wanted to.

He could shift his soft power approaches against Musk. That is, if Trump's understanding of soft power were better than Cersi Lannister.

[–] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 19 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

However, Trump doesn't generally seem to care about how much someone has helped him in the past if one minor slight shows up. If Musk can't help him at this very instance, he'd be open to throwing him under the bus. He abandons people fast

[–] frezik@midwest.social 4 points 16 hours ago

Musk and his friends understand soft power better than Trump does. That is, understand it at all. They have more options if that happens.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 3 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Musk and some more background people likely saved the Trump campaign from financial ruin. He couldn’t be rid of them if he wanted to.

His campaign is over. He is president now. And he can do whatever he wants... and has been doing exactly that.

My sister speculated that somebody (probably trump...) uploaded something far worse than "the pee-pee tape" to twitter and musk inherited that when he bought the site.

But even that only goes so long and... trump has SCOTUS backing to send seal team six after whoever he wants.

[–] growsomethinggood@reddthat.com 3 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

On your last point, I'm surprised that Musk isn't more visibly worried about assassination attempts. He's really not making friends with anyone in government or otherwise, and the one guy backing him is a bad mood away from testing his full immunity powers and seizing several billions for himself. Like, if I had that kind of fuck off money, I sure wouldn't be putting my neck on the line for this.

[–] FoxyFerengi@lemm.ee 2 points 16 hours ago

Musk seems like the type to be enamored with dead man switches. Although, I'm not sure if he's smart enough to actually use any

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] breakingcups@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago

My sister speculated that somebody (probably trump...) uploaded something far worse than "the pee-pee tape" to twitter and musk inherited that when he bought the site.

That is the dumbest thing I've ever heard speculated

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Gerudo@lemm.ee 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Elon is filthy rich though. There is a difference.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

He’s rich so far, but he really seems to be alienating his consumer customer base. If he keeps this up, his car company could crash as fast as it grew, and maybe his other customers will start reacting

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 3 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

He's worth over $400 billion. He could literally set warehouses full of cash on fire and not notice.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

He owns stock currently worth a ridiculous amount. It’s worth so much that tanking Twitter was no big deal, and of course buying a government position is cheap.

But that stock is tied to the value off a small number of companies, especially Tesla. If people stopped buying their products because of that ceo, that’s going to take a couple hundred billion off the top. Yes, that does seem to be happening in Europe. Meanwhile Chinese companies are eating their lunch in most of the world and the us is apparently going back to some smog filled dark medieval time

It’s unfortunate that their cars and other products are still compelling, still have features unmatched by any competitors

And of course there’s spacex, and other companies, not yet impacted.

[–] spidermanchild@sh.itjust.works 1 points 26 minutes ago

I totally agree with your take other than that their cars are anything special at this point - what features are unmatched by competitors? Yes they were innovative at the time but they currently don't lead in efficiency, range, charging, ride quality, interior quality, and FSD was/is an absolute grift.

[–] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 11 points 17 hours ago

Elon is going to demote Trump and make him his special little Gaza emissary

[–] shyguyblue@lemmy.world 11 points 19 hours ago

Are we taking bets on how many scaramuccis he's got left?

[–] tipicaldik@lemmy.world 18 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Psychological warfare. Trump's an easy mark. We need more of it...

[–] marius@feddit.org 23 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

TBF Elon actually uncoverd a lot of corruption. Just not the way Trump thinks

Indeed. The day after inauguration, Elon woke up, walked to the bathroom, flipped on the light, and stared straight ahead, instantly discovering corruption the likes of which America has never seen.

[–] 2ugly2live@lemmy.world 7 points 15 hours ago

Okay, but this is seriously funny.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 14 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Hey, instead of asking him about a magazine cover - then acting like it's some huge win when he pretends to think the magazine was out of business, and goes on to complete Musk...

....maybe just maybe, you could ask him how Musk's department might go about investigating SpaceX grants and the government funding it get?

You could even use bog adult journalism terms like "Conflict of Interest".

[–] meowmeowbeanz@sh.itjust.works 8 points 15 hours ago

Time’s latest pantomime—a Musk-Tump fusion seated at the Resolute Desk of Delusion. Classic. The man who thinks truth is a flexible spreadsheet and the guy who thinks “fraud and corruption” is a compliment. Peak propaganda.

Trump’s “indifference” is as convincing as Musk’s “genius.” Both crave validation from the same media they pretend to despise. Pathetic. Time’s covers? Just participation trophies for oligarchs cosplaying as revolutionaries.

The real joke? Watching these clowns orbit each other’s egos while the world burns. But hey, at least the Resolute Desk now doubles as a therapy couch for billionaires with daddy issues.

[–] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
[–] urquell@lemm.ee 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Nasan@sopuli.xyz 1 points 14 hours ago

He's president of the yankees

[–] chemicalwonka@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 18 hours ago

Time Magazine didn't lie (this time)

[–] WolfmanEightySix@piefed.social 5 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

When was The Orange Fart Person of the Year?

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 12 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

just a reminder that 'person of the year' is not necessarily 'good person of the year'..

it is awarded to people who have had significant impact on global events during the year (i.e. 'news makers')--good OR bad.

[–] WolfmanEightySix@piefed.social 1 points 2 hours ago

I didnt know that, don’t think I’ve ever read a Time magazine. Thanks for the info.

[–] vividspecter@lemm.ee 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Unfortunately, adhering to traditionalism means inflating the ego yet further of dictators. I'd rather the whole thing went away altogether (that would have been a real statement if they'd just left the thing blank).

[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago

Can we just find a way to surprise mega-dose these fuckers with magic mushrooms already?

load more comments
view more: next ›