this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2025
1406 points (97.6% liked)

Memes

46492 readers
1126 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Xanthobilly@lemmy.world 146 points 1 week ago (7 children)

I think I figured out one reason Trump is going after Greenland. It looks huge on a Mercator Projection map even though it isn’t that large.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 89 points 1 week ago

That is genuinely stupid enough to be plausible.

[–] KryptonNerd@slrpnk.net 16 points 1 week ago

Oh wow, this actually makes sense now

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Look at it, it's almost as bit as Africa! We haven't found who is the president of Africa, so we had to make do with Greenland though.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago (5 children)

There is one and only one reason Trump/US wants Greenland. With US out of NATO, it is a point closer to Europe to threaten Europe. Every other explanation is a disgusting lie, and of zero value to US.

[–] masquenox@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

With US out of NATO, it is a point closer to Europe to threaten Europe.

The US has Britain, which is essentially a US client state these days.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 days ago

UK is indeed "close" to US. Unequal relationship where US keeps dangling free trade deal, but never delivers, no matter how many pipelines Liz Truss helps blow up. It is more of a close political relationship, rather than UK people desperate to follow every war. Musk threatening to liberate UK from liberals they voted for last, is a strain on public opinion. US using Greenland to threaten EU would lose US's shine as a beacon of freedom, as perhaps tariffs on Canada, to extort its sovereignty, do. UK would see alliance with US much as Canada realizes.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It wouldn't be very strategically important to the US on its own, but it currently is strategically important to NATO and harmful to Russia.

Getting NATO out of Greenland is Putin's order.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Absolutely absurdity that has to stop. Greenland is far away from Russia. Fine, some possible ICBM missile trajectories go over Greenland, but NATO is not going to stop US from putting missile shield or offensive nukes in Greenland, as long as it stays under NATO oversight. The Putin Derangement Syndrome that extends to explaining all Trump actions as gifts to Russia needs to stop being said out loud. Pure CIA disinformation to somehow brainwash Europe into accepting this.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's about Naval access to the Atlantic. The Russian Navy has to go between Greenland and Norway. With NATO controlling both sides, they don't have a route to the Atlantic through friendly waters.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago (15 children)

There are international waters between Iceland and UK. When US is part of NATO, with as a matter of fact, dictatorial control over NATO, ownership of Greenland doesn't matter. It is only a severance of US/NATO alliance that makes Greenland matter.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago (4 children)

BlueAnon conspiracy theorists continue to only be able to respond to bad things Americans do by saying "this is secretly the work of a foreigner"

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

It looks huge on a Mercator Projection map even though it isn’t that large.

In the Mercator projection it appears to have about the same area as Africa, while in reality it is about a 14th of it. But, I wouldn't say that "isn't that large": if Greenland was independent it would be (and Denmark is, because of it) the 12th largest country in the world.

[–] Yggnar@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

My guess is that it has to do with rights to the ocean floor.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 39 points 1 week ago (1 children)

With Tump back in the office, soon enough they’ll be auctioning off federal lands and the postal service. Privatization is back on the menu.

[–] Sludgehammer@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago (4 children)
[–] lemon@sh.itjust.works 40 points 1 week ago (1 children)

To the extent that the billboard never existed while the image implies it did – sure.

I love the term ‘slop’. It’s one of my favorite new words along with ‘nontent’.

But this, to me, isn’t that. I think of slop as ‘unrequested, unconvincing, lazy, and lifeless’. In short, ineffective and unwelcome.

I feel like this meme gets the message across. It’s not great, but it’s not terrible. The AI tells are subtle enough: the multi lane pileup in the background and some poor small size text rendering.

Not sure why I felt the need to write this. Guess I’m of the opinion that just because something is AI-generated doesn’t mean it should be discounted immediately, unless it really feels like zero effort went into it. Have a nice day!

[–] Noobnarski@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, I feel like there isn't much of a difference between taking an existing picture and editing the text into it or using AI to generate a picture and editing the text into it.

Because I think the text looks way too good to be done by AI.

[–] dkt@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago

I'm fairly certain the text is AI generated too, just because of the questionable "creative" decisions that I don't think a human would make (why does some of the text have overlines? why is only the Canada line red? why are all the lines jarringly different font sizes?)

plus, now that I zoom in, one of the colons has different sizes for the top and bottom dots. I guess GANs can just do text now

[–] FeelThePower@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

that was close, almost upvoted.

[–] Sludgehammer@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I mean the message is good, but the medium is, well slop.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 28 points 1 week ago

Things you can do when you have fuck-you money to burn: buy a billboard.

I thought about buying / renting a billboard in a small town in Texas where a shitty family mistreated my partner's nephew when he did a cultural-exchange program (her family is Thai). It would be essentially this but about that family. I didn't go through with it because they got kicked out of the program via other avenues.

I did buy a discounted ad on a podcast to rail about how much I hate ads. That was fun. I think I paid like $175 or something. I don't have fuck-you money, but I do have low level fuck-around money.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

As usual we've found an engaging distraction to play whack-a-mole with for a while. When we get bored with bashing Elon Musk we'll find another one, never addressing the core problem of how to take down the oligarchy. Because that will take methodical work and a huge amount of diligent research and objective thinking - assuming anybody ever gets around to doing it at all. Most of us just entertain ourselves with angry memes, created by the few people with enough motivation to do even that much. This is why aristocracy systems can keep perpetuating themselves - they rely on human inertia - most people prioritize entertainment over doing anything substantial. Bottom line, that's the real reason things are the way they are.

[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

thank you

edit: actually the main page is pretty much dead links R us.

[–] Kalladblog@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I'm out of the loop and also not American. Can somebody elaborate please?

[–] dabaldeagul@feddit.nl 38 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Trump wants to buy Greenland and Canada, rename the gulf of Mexico to the gulf of America, and take control of the Panama canal

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Trump wants to invade Greenland and Panama. He wants to extort Canada into having no other choice than to submit to statehood.

[–] dabaldeagul@feddit.nl 4 points 1 week ago

Apologies, I don't follow Trump crap too closely since I'm in the EU and I don't want to turn into a doomer so I based it off the pic

But yeah all in all fuck Trump

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

He has no interest in buying either Canada or Greenland. He hasn't ruled out using force though.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 18 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Elon Musk is the resident Nazi at the heart of the US government and is widely believed to have bought his influence with Trump. Oh and also Trump is President again after being a convicted criminal. No this isn't a joke.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] CuffsOffWilly@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Donald Trump has offered to purchase Greenland. He wants to take the Panama Canal by brute force and keeps suggesting that Canada should become a State in order to avoid his oncoming tariffs. Meanwhile, Musk 'donated' about 250,000,000 USD to Trumps election campaign helping ensure he won and now we are all watching the US become an oligarchy. (Effectively Trump is owned by Musk).

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Donald Trump has offered to purchase Greenland.

No, Trump has been saying, in a threatening way, that Greenland is going to be part of the United States. He hasn't suggested buying it, but he hasn't ruled out taking it with military force.

Effectively Trump is owned by Musk

No. Musk bought a little influence and so far hasn't pissed Trump off enough that he's been cut off. But, it's just a matter of time.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

It's both. He keeps asking how much for Greenland while suggestively saying it's necessary for security. So threat and purchase offer. Like a true criminal.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

People sometimes come up with things they think are clever, but don't have the time, money, or energy to present them in a meaningful way, so they instead make a shitty AI image of a billboard to get more attention than their words would otherwise.

[–] tdawg@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

I'm more worried if Germany is for sale

[–] daveoss@aussie.zone 10 points 1 week ago

Boy in a candy store mentality, although surprised he knew how to zoom out on google maps.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago

Ah yes, because the US has a history of just accepting no for an answer and absolutely does not use coercion and violence to get the desired outcome.

[–] zante@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 week ago

I feel like I’ve read snappier slogans.

load more comments
view more: next ›