this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2025
21 points (100.0% liked)

Casual Conversation

2025 readers
203 users here now

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.


RULES (updated 01/22/25)

  1. Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling. To be concise, disrespect is defined by escalation.
  2. Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible. You won't be punished for trying.
  3. Avoid controversial topics (politics or societal debates come to mind, though we are not saying not to talk about anything that resembles these). There's a guide in the protocol book offered as a mod model that can be used for that; it's vague until you realize it was made for things like the rule in question. At least four purple answers must apply to a "controversial" message for it to be allowed.
  4. Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate. A rule of thumb is if a recording of a conversation put on another platform would get someone a COPPA violation response, that exact exchange should be avoided when possible.
  5. No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc. The chart redirected to above applies to spam material as well, which is one of the reasons its wording is vague, as it applies to a few things. Again, a "spammy" message must be applicable to four purple answers before it's allowed.
  6. Respect privacy as well as truth: Don’t ask for or share any personal information or slander anyone. A rule of thumb is if something is enough info to go by that it "would be a copyright violation if the info was art" as another group put it, or that it alone can be used to narrow someone down to 150 physical humans (Dunbar's Number) or less, it's considered an excess breach of privacy. Slander is defined by intentional utilitarian misguidance at the expense (positive or negative) of a sentient entity. This often links back to or mixes with rule one, which implies, for example, that even something that is true can still amount to what slander is trying to achieve, and that will be looked down upon.

Casual conversation communities:

Related discussion-focused communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] donuts@lemmy.world 24 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)
[–] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

It starts to get really funky.

[–] Jackhammer_Joe@lemmy.world -1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The video and the effects of different pi values are sick! But I've never heard such a bad speaker. Speaking in front of an audience isn't the strong suit of this guy

[–] denteleite@lemm.ee 4 points 3 days ago

This comment is kinda mean. He successfully engaged the audience and even makes them laugh while informing them on his topic. I'm curious to hear what qualifies him as a "bad speaker" in your mind.

[–] m_f 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

This doesn't directly answer your question, but things would probably get very weird compared to our universe. Here's an interactive visualization of a different weird universe with two time dimensions, Dichronauts by Greg Egan:

https://www.gregegan.net/DICHRONAUTS/02/Interactive.html

He really goes through the math on that site, so you might get some insight into how other topologies would look

[–] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Whoa. That's over my head.

[–] LordPassionFruit@lemm.ee 7 points 4 days ago

I prefer π = 3.14 ± 0.14. Add a little chaos.

[–] superkret@feddit.org 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Probably a lot like Indiana.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I suppose you could redefine pi to be exactly like 3, but you'd have to change the value of 1 to be equal to (π/3) which would make it very difficult to buy bananas.

[–] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

I don't buy bananas, so this isn't relevant to me.

[–] glowing_hans@sopuli.xyz 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

if pi was 3, the area of a circle would be equal to 3 squares with side-length of the radius. this means the definition of a circle would be different, since now a circle is 3 squares. This would break geometry. Since the definition of a circle is the foundation of geometry, and trigonometric functions sin and cos.

Hmm or maybe if the area of a circle A=r*r*PI and PI = 3 so A=r*r*3 you would just scale the radius by the factor of sqrt(pi)/sqrt(3) = 1.0233267079464885... to get to a correct circle again.

So you would just scale the universe by a factor slightly larger than 1, up-scaling everything.

But then the formula for the volume of a sphere V=4/3*pi*r*r*r would break ………

[–] xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

This question does not make sense. π is an abstract mathematical constant whose value has absolutely nothing to do with the physical world. It’s like asking “what would the universe look like if the word ‘fish’ started with ‘p’?”

"what would the universe look like if the word ‘fish’ started with ‘p’?”

More tie dye, for one.

[–] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Oh, no way!

[–] hihi24522@lemm.ee 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Pi as in math like Euler’s identity, cannot be changed. It arises from the definition of e and imaginary numbers, both of which arise from the natural numbers which arise directly from axioms.

Pi as in the ratio of a circle’s circumference to its diameter, however, could be changed, in which case you would change the fundamental geometry of space. This would be neither hyperbolic nor spherical space because those spaces still use the mathematical pi for determining angles (along with hyperbolic trig functions of course).

The geometry would likely be much closer to Chebyshev or Taxicab space since the ratio of circumference to diameter in those spaces is 4 (I think…). Because of this, I suspect that using a distance function like in Chebyshev or Manhattan but with a triangular grid instead of a square one would yield this exact situation where geometric pi=3. This would be confusing as hell but now I’m curious and have coincidentally already started exploring the concept of metric spaces so I’ll look into it. Though I’ll probably get distracted and forget…


Edit: Found it, Chebyshev distance on hexagonal grid would give a circumference/diameter ratio of 3. So a metric space with a distance function like that is the geometry you want.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk 2 points 3 days ago

All circles would be slightly smaller. - source, am a Professor of Sizemology

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Like a curved triangle that's actually a circle?

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

You universe's pi doesn't equal pi... it equals 3...

But can it run Doom?

https://youtube.com/watch?v=_ZSFRWJCUY4&t=450s

Yes. Mostly.

Spatial cohesion worsens as pi diverges from... pi.

[–] shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

What game is that? The background noise was just a dude saying distortion over and over again

[–] shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 1 points 4 days ago

Pokémon Platinum. Towards the end of the game, you meet the villain in the game's version of Hell, known as the Distortion World. The background noise was likely put in there as a joke.