this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2025
394 points (95.4% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

55713 readers
317 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

No, it's not like stealing a physical item from a store.

"stealing" a digital copy of a movie, tv show or a game is like if the item you're stealing from a store is infinitely copyable. Like the replicator from star trek...or that one episode of Sabrina the teenage witch with that box that can make a perfect copy of everything you put inside of it.

Of course I personally would never pirate anything, no matter how much streaming services increase their prices or how much they crack down on VPN usage to get around geo-restrictions, PIRACY IS BAD AND ONLY BAD PEOPLE DO IT.

I've never pirated anything in my whole life!

There are people who understand what I'm saying...but apparently most people don't get it.

Of course that means I still would never pirate anything. That would be horrible to "steal" a copy of a movie or a TV show

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Xed@lemm.ee 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Piracy is great because it helps you not support corporation’s greed. They can’t profit off of you 😄

[–] ThatGuyNamedZeus@feddit.org 1 points 4 days ago

But of course, piracy is bad. That's why you shouldn't ever do it! Why do you think every corporation has to get government handouts from the tax payers? Because we keep stealing from them....I mean...You keep stealing from them. I would never do that and I certainly don't ever do that. I haven't paid for any movies in over 10 years, so obviously that means I just don't watch anything that costs money to see.

I use a privacy friendly VPN that allows P2P because I play games online and no other reason

myth: ~~cable~~ piracy is wrong.

fact: ~~cable~~ companies are big, faceless corporations which makes it okay!

[–] Evkob@lemmy.ca 90 points 1 week ago (5 children)

No, it’s not like stealing a physical item from a store.

I'd argue stealing physical items from massive corporations is also morally acceptable. If you shoplift from a small mom & pop store, you're actively hurting your community, however, if you shoplift from Wal-Mart, you're actively hurting an entity which is hurting your community, therefore helping your community.

[–] Alice@beehaw.org 40 points 1 week ago

Shoplifting from Walmart hurts my knees because the boss won't believe that our onhand numbers are wrong and makes me check high and low before I can nil pick it 🥲

This isn't an ethical argument against shoplifting btw, this is an ethical argument in favor of nuking Walmart

[–] med@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Stealing sustinence from societal cancer is practically an immune response.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 45 points 1 week ago

I've said it before, and I'll say it again. If buying isn't owning, then pirating can't be stealing.

[–] Draegur@lemm.ee 42 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

perhaps the only ethical consumption under capitalism is that which denies capitalists their profit.

[–] ThatGuyNamedZeus@feddit.org 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I mean...if the movie is good you should support it. Vote with your wallet.

[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago

I mean…if the movie is good you should support it

What is 'it'? The movie is a published work, it can't be financially supported. Who is being supported with the money you pay?

Vote with your wallet.

Unfortunately, consumer boycott (and conversely, support) usually isn't an effective strategy at this scale you're talking about. Unless you and all your friends are voting with a few thousand dollars, it's hardly going to make a dent in the numbers.

[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

If the movie is good, you should support it by making a donation to the strike fund of the unions that represent the artists that actually create the movies. You can support artists without supporting the amoral companies that produce these works.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 36 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

It is always morally acceptable?

Morality is, literally, subjective. There is no universal answer to that question.

I personally consider anything being sold by a distributor to be fair game, no questions asked. If I pay for mainstream music, films or games, most of the time, zero of that money goes to the workers who created those artworks. It just makes rich owners richer, because they legally own rights. I would go as far as to say it's morally wrong to pay for those things, it's not neutral, it's supporting a cycle of abuse at your own expense. So that's my perspective on your 'giant corporations' question.

Digital copying isn't stealing, unfortunately, because those giant companies deserve to have their hoard of capital expropriated.

Two screenshots. The first is a headline: "The world's richest countries came up with just $22 million to fight the Amazon fires.", the second lists the budget for The Emoji Movie: $50 million.[src]

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FantasticDonkey@reddthat.com 27 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] TuxEnthusiast@monero.town 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 week ago

I do since it's a better service

[–] yozul@beehaw.org 7 points 1 week ago

¿Por qué no los dos?

Given that no one makes a fuss about it when corporations do the stealing, I think so.

[–] noorbeast@lemmy.zip 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I would like to suggest an alternate perspective, that digital media be beholden to protocols not platforms.

In other words lets focus on the drivers of competition...most evidence suggests that piracy goes down in response to easily accessible and affordable market conditions.

[–] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 5 points 1 week ago

most evidence suggests that piracy goes down in response to easily accessible and affordable market conditions.

The assholes know this too. We're about due for another round of deshitifcation, just long enough to restore complacency.

[–] chahk@beehaw.org 20 points 1 week ago

If "buying" is not owning, then "piracy" is not stealing.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Worrying about "property" of any parasite is something that I never bother to do.

Giving money to your enemy is idiotic tho.

There is a class war out there and normies are too busy funding their oppressors

[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago

Giving money to your enemy is idiotic tho. There is a class war out there and normies are too busy funding their oppressors

Absolutely. At the end of the day, most of the moral ideals being thrown around are, at the end of the day, nice ideas.

Giant corporations exist to get more money and, history shows, media companies will happily brainwash us and buy oppressive politicians just to push their profits up. Furthermore, they serve as a megaphone for the ideas of the owner class, who are historically the core force behind fascism when society is in crisis.

Giving them your resources is fucking suicidal.

[–] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They promised they would go out of business if I pirated their content, and that was a lie.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] orsetto@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 week ago

If they keep raising my food subscription I'm gonna start pirating from supermarkets too

[–] LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

People try to boil these things down to incredibly simplistic rules in an effort to justify what they’ve already decided they’re going to do.

I am pro piracy, as I imagine virtually everyone on this community is. But I also think people get way too reductionist because that is easier than engaging with the nuances of what it means to “steal” or “pirate” or when we are or aren’t hurting a creator.

I think the pros vastly outweigh the cons, the “victims” are few and far between due to it being so rare/situational as to make it ok to functionally treat it like there are none, and I also think all the people arguing they are “doing media preservation” who don’t even know what a proper 3-2-1 backup is are full of shit lol. I also think people need to accept the fact they just want free shit sometimes and trying to dress up their motivations/sense of entitlement to free media with high minded arguments about sticking it to corporations or whatever is disingenuous - just own the decision!

I use my server because it is convenient and because I don’t want my kids being visually assaulted and manipulated every time they turn on a tv. I used to watch one of them visibly become panicked when all the tiles of a streaming service would pop up in front of him, it was just so overwhelming. I went a solid seven or eight years without the high seas because there was a time when streaming services were reasonably priced, convenient, and not dominated by ads. Now that that is no longer the case, I have gone back to my server. Simple as that.

I don’t mind paying for a service, I don’t even mind the occasional advertisement in my life. But what we have right now is absolutely ridiculous and easily justifies so many reasons for pirating.

All of this is to say you’re not gonna find people here who disagree with your decision to pirate. But you’re also not going to find some airtight philosophical argument that works 100% of the time. You have to consider the ethical implications of your actions in your day-to-day life, there are no simple rules to avoid that.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The number of examples of media becoming unreachable to paying consumers keeps growing.

Warner Brothers (Max) is the greatest example of this. Years of content from Cartoon Network just disappeared, leaving the consumer no legal avenue to enjoy some of their favorite shows.

I do not advocate for piracy. I advocate for archiving.

[–] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 10 points 1 week ago

I do not advocate for piracy. I advocate for archiving.

Exactly. And if the assholes make it illegal for librarians, well then yo ho ho.

[–] Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 week ago

There is no "stealing from corporations"

It's as easy as that

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Piracy is a response to various kinds of market failure, inequality.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It is always morally preferrable to pirate things made by giant corporations

Fixed It For You.

Regardless of what is regarded as a crime against the state, it is wrongdoing against the public to support corporations that seek to extract more wealth than value they produce.

Intellectual property rights were a (very) temporary monopoly to give creators an incentive to create in order to build a robust public domain.

Copyrights, patents and trademarks no longer do that. So charging for content is now rent-seeking

Corporations, their share holders and the plutocrats who own them pull wealth out of the economy by hoarding it. The whenever you buy from anything but directly from the creator, you are reducing the wealth in the economy since your money goes straight into Scrooge McDuck's swimming coffers.

And our public domain only contains stuff from a century ago. Steamboat Willie became public domain just a year or two ago. Copyright holders and courts even assert all content should be owned and licensed, including SCOTUS. (Though the US Supreme Court is a traitor to the United States and its constitution.)

Pirate everything. Steal from companies for they have already stolen from you.

[–] Robust_Mirror@aussie.zone 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm not going to say piracy is right or wrong.

What I will say is if everyone had access to that replicator, and everyone replicated everything in the store and left, the store would close down, and the products would stop being made.

Likewise, piracy is only viable because not everyone does it. If literally every person pirated the games or movies of any given company, that company would no longer be profitable and would close down.

Piracy is getting something for free because other people pay for it.

[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Except there are people who buy something AND want to have offline backup copies of it.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] sunglocto@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No but i dont care

I've been pirating for years. I just don't want to pay for things

load more comments (1 replies)

PIRACY IS BAD AND ONLY BAD PEOPLE DO IT.

I’ve never pirated anything in my whole life!

Good thing you said that, I was about to send some agents to have a "nice chat" with you.

[–] Kekzkrieger@feddit.org 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My moral is always on match with that of the company so in most cases everything is acceptable.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zier@fedia.io 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

When you download music online for free and prevent the company from making a profit off of a creative work by the artist, that they prevented from making a profit & royalties, is that wrong? Doubtful. You can always send the artist money directly if you want to support them.

[–] ThatGuyNamedZeus@feddit.org 7 points 1 week ago

the DMCA doesn't protect the artists or any of the singers, it protects the shitty record labels and the money that the executives at those companies get

[–] Hegar@fedia.io 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Stealing a physical item from a giant corporate store is also always morally acceptable.

Having power neurologically suppresses empathy. Therefor resources controlled by the powerful will on average be used more harmfully. Taking resources from the powerful reduces total harm done.

You will use a loaf of bread less harmfully than Walmart will use the profit from it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago

Why do you have to take a moral stance?

Do it because it’s cool

[–] lemmeBe@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago
load more comments
view more: next ›