this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2025
373 points (93.9% liked)

Technology

60389 readers
5450 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] vader8er@pawb.social 62 points 6 days ago
[–] ThomasCrappersGhost@feddit.uk 33 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I thought the whole point of being right wing was being negative?

[–] lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

When your whole identity is consumed by boundless, baseless, joyless hatred of "the other", yes, you're gonna be negative.

I don't believe Musk is controlled by any of that though. He might share in it, but it doesn't quite dictate him as much as it dictates those in actual misery. For example, he isn't actually opposed to letting immigrants in, if they'll make him richer. He's motivated by greed and grift, and no small helping of pride.

I suspect he just doesn't want people criticising him and his cronies. Particularly when they inevitably start enacting policies that affect their base negatively (we've already seen our share of face-eating leopard voters shocked to find out that their face isn't off limits), social media could help pissed off people realise how many others are pissed off too. I don't think I need to spell out why that could be dangerous for him.

Better to quell dissent entirely. If nobody can complain about the government, it's harder to organise against it. Suppress criticism, censor the media, manipulate what you get to see to shape your view...

Sounds familiar, doesn't it?

(Obligatory note that calling a dictatorship communism doesn't make it less authoritarian than a capitalist dictatorship. Red boots hurt just as much as any other color if they step on your neck, no matter how tasty they might be. That has nothing to do with the topic, I'm just bracing for tankie whataboutisms.)

[–] ThomasCrappersGhost@feddit.uk 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I was being slightly sarcastic cause right wing folk seem to be very negative, or nostalgic, but in a negative sense. But I get your point.

[–] lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Oh you're absolutely right, I just felt like spelling out the subtext of "Musk isn't in it for the right wing mentality, just for the power" that I thought you were hinting at but left unsaid. I wasn't trying to contradict you at all, but rather to expand on your setup.

[–] ThomasCrappersGhost@feddit.uk 2 points 4 days ago

I appreciate the comment cause it’s definitely something I haven’t considered enough.

[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 22 points 6 days ago

Incumbent wants everyone to talk about how great things are.

[–] Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk 14 points 6 days ago

Don't want any Debbie-downers on Shitter once his bestie is in the big chair.

[–] HeartyOfGlass@lemm.ee 11 points 6 days ago

I'm curious whether Truth Social will acquire Xitter, or vice versa.

And when.

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I mean in principle this is just a matter of moderation being different from censorship.

But really, an "algorithm tweak"? I am still wondering when or why who decided that we needed to have "algorithms" that someone could "tweak" on the Internet at all. The first kind of "social media" I ever used was web forums where the entire "algorithm" was thread bumping, and even if you insist that we need to have the structure of a microblog: Mastodon does fine without an "algorithm" beyond reverse-chronological sorting.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I think Mastodon does fine, too, but I've often heard people complain about the lack of an algorithm. Like, they don't know how to find things if they aren't being shoveled into their feed

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 6 days ago

Personally I follow slightly more than 100 accounts plus less than 10 hashtags and feel I'm already getting plenty of things into my feed, nowadays I tend to unfollow things that post too many irrelevant things more than I follow new ones.

[–] tb_@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

But you had all these rightwing weirdos complaining they were being censored because "the algorithm" didn't promote their weird little ideas enough!

Back when.
So tweaking the algorithm is quite literally censorship!

Not that this "free-speech absolutist" has proven particularly true to his word.

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 6 days ago

I strongly agree with the point made in the linked article that censorship is when a sender wants to send something, the receiver wants to receive it, but a third party (government, social media platform, whoever) keeps them from doing so.

If I want to see "weird little ideas of rightwing weirdos" (or of leftwing weirdos or any others), I should be allowed to. If I don't, I shouldn't have to.

[–] uebquauntbez@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago

Reading the title I thought he'll retire.

[–] infinitevalence 6 points 6 days ago

Dont shit where you eat Elon. Its your own turd sandwich so yeah....

[–] Aganim@lemmy.world 247 points 1 week ago

Ah, so he's going to stop posting there? Right?

[–] not_that_guy05@lemmy.world 206 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Now that the election is over and we won, let's remove our bots. - musk

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 days ago

The bots are removed! All 9 users (8 of them are EM sockpuppets) celebrate!

[–] takeda@lemm.ee 84 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Oh, c'mon, who's going to tell him he is the best dad? He needs them.

[–] tja@sh.itjust.works 34 points 1 week ago

Ah, but there are still elections in other parts of the world, like Germany, where he is also very active

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 125 points 1 week ago (5 children)

No no, guys, you're misunderstanding. He MEANS there's too much negativity from people saying things like "X sucks since musk bought twitter....."

He's going to change those people's tweets to say "X is great!"

And by that I mean he's going to have a team to edit tweets that he doesn't like!

If that's not free speech, then Musk doesn't know what is!

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] santa@sh.itjust.works 104 points 1 week ago (1 children)

He’s shutting down his account?

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 45 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No he's gonna ban anyone who disagrees with him.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 78 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 43 points 1 week ago

A cisgender guy.

(This comment has been removed for violating X's policy on the use of derogatory slurs)

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 72 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)
[–] GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 6 days ago

Free speech abolitionist, more like.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 64 points 1 week ago

my puppet is in power — everyone be nice now.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 60 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Instead of “bad” you have to say “ungood” from now on.

[–] SDK@midwest.social 10 points 6 days ago

Double plus ungood!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee 47 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

X/Twitter is a misinformation platform. If you know a major influencer that uses, consider informing and directing them to the ActivityPub alternatives, even advertising on their platforms if you can.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I like how you say "that uses" instead of "that uses it" because the former generally implies drug use.

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee 2 points 5 days ago

Good point, best to leave it like that 🙃

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] lig@lemmings.world 44 points 1 week ago

Closing the shop will achieve that goal perfectly.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 41 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah the best thing Trump can do for himself is Epstein another friend

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 week ago

He's such a fucking baby

[–] Xanthobilly@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago

Now that the election is over, he’s hiding the lightning rod.

load more comments
view more: next ›