this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2023
356 points (99.2% liked)

Canada

7203 readers
167 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca/


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bloopernova@programming.dev 136 points 1 year ago (2 children)

While this seems to be more aimed at scooters and the like, I've been waiting for electric vehicles and renters to become an issue.

Landlords are going to try to avoid putting in electric car charging points for as long as they can. They simply don't want to spend the money.

[–] schmidtster@lemmy.world 72 points 1 year ago (22 children)

The issue is a little more nuanced than that. Most buildings can only install a few EV chargers before they need to upgrade the mains, and if that needs to be done, the transformers likely aren’t adequate, and the local grid may not be able to withstand it as well.

The owners costs ends at the transformers, taxpayers and the energy corp are in for the rest, and until the energy corp upgrades the grid and transformers, building owners can only do so much.

[–] namingthingsiseasy@programming.dev 71 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

If the infrastructure can't handle it, then upgrade the fucking infrastructure! Politicians will fall at voters' feet to build new roads, highways, etc., but when it comes to the green energy transition, there's no problem too minuscule to be ignored!

I'll happily admit that there are going to be many issues in the green energy transition; we should acknowledge them, but we should also strive to address them, rather than throwing our hands up in the air and idly promulgating the status quo.

[–] bradmont@lemmy.ca 28 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Switching from one type of car to another isn't a green transition. Car production still creates enormous co2 emissions, paving everything for cars makes heat islands, tires produce piles of particulate pollution, and so on. Fixing the car pollution problem means moving to other forms of transportation, not just slightly-less-bad automobiles.

[–] teuast@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Amen. Don't have to worry about the house, neighborhood, or city infrastructures supporting your EV if your EV is an ebike that can plug into a standard outlet in your living room, or wherever you keep it. Or if you can just walk a quarter mile and hop on a light rail. Or if instead of driving a Ford, you just use your Chevrolegs. Of course, this does also require development patterns to support it, i.e. roads that aren't fucking death traps for anyone outside a car and stuff being close enough together that you can actually get to it in a reasonable amount of time, but hey, there are also non-car-related reasons we should be doing those things too.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] schmidtster@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They are upgrading it, as people need it and as fast as they can ahead of planned upgrades.

There shortages on parts, so most are being done as required, but to think it’s not being upgraded (in most places, local bullshit aside) is just pure ignorance.

I'm sure people are trying to address the problems, I'm not saying that's not happening. What I find maddening however is the double standard between how issues are handled when it's fossil fuels vs. green energy. Every tiny issue with green energy is breathlessly amplified, while there's no shortage of idiotic solutions to resolve issues in carbon-based energy infrastructure.

It's this atmosphere that I'm trying to raise awareness of and change!

[–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"The grid can't handle it" is a bullshit argument that is easy to sell to people who want to keep their IC cars. The difference between highest demand and lowest demand in Ontario this week was 7000MW, if everyone charges their car at night there is power available AND it helps increase the base load which is good for the gird operators.

Even individual buildings may not need to upgrade their main service even with rapid chargers, the operators just need to keep in mind not to run the oven, dryer, AC and car charger at the same time.

https://www.ieso.ca/power-data

[–] schmidtster@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Yes the power plants can pump out enough, but not all transfer stations are able to handle the load, each individual hub, may not be able to handle the load.

It’s far more nuanced than this even, but don’t believe everything everyone is selling you, everyone has an agenda and no one is going to tell you the entire truth.

If an entire block suddenly goes EV one night the infrastructure isn’t there, it’s slowly being updated which you don’t see, but there’s issues out there.

[–] Sir_Osis_of_Liver@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

New Brunswick had a program in the 1970s/80s to get people to switch to electric home heating due to the oil shocks. That was far more ambitious than what is being proposed here.

Edit. I was curious, so I looked up recent numbers for home heating in NB, as it's the area I'm most familiar with.

From 2000-2020, the number of residences increased by 46,000 (285,000 to 331,000). Overall, 72% of which are detached houses. The market share of electric heating went from 57% overall to 79% in those 22 years.

New generation was limited to ~400MW nameplate of wind and one 250MW combined cycle natural gas plant, while several older coal/heavy oil units were mothballed, so overall output hardly changed.

There are a lot of places that grew a lot faster. Yet, the power stayed on.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (19 children)

Moot point, nowhere will suddenly switch to electric vehicles overnight.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (14 children)

Everyone in the burbs run their AC full tilt all summer and the grid holds up just fine. An EV charger used overnight, when your AC runs less, would present no more of a load than the daytime high usage. Stop pushing anti-electrification bullshit, or move to Alberta, they love that shit.

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Sir_Osis_of_Liver@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago (5 children)

This is no different from the widespread adoption of electric clothes dryers, water heaters or domestic home air conditioning. Electrical distribution is never static.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] cloaker@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Also, on 2400w an EV can charge a significantly large amount overnight. You mightn't need a charge point in the first place.

[–] ShadowRam@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (14 children)

2400W x number of occupants is still some series draw on their main panel.

Their point still stands that their mains would need an upgrade.

[–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Electrician here, no it would not need to upgrade your panel to add a charger. If you have an intermittent load, like a car charger, you can add it on to your panel provided you don't run it along with your other high power, intermittent loads (clothes dryer, oven).

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] bloopernova@programming.dev 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I hadn't considered that aspect, thank you for the information!

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] Fogle@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I own an electric car and I accept maybe I've been luckier than most but my last basement suite the landlord put it in completely of his own will and his own dime at my request. He reused some old hot tub wiring and it worked great. And my current apartment I had them pick their preferred electrical company and paid for it myself since it was just a plug like 3 feet down from their sub panel.

So far I've not had a ton of issues finding places. It definitely limits where you can live with some places only having street parking or just not having the capability of putting in a charger or plug but there are definitely places out there

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 12 points 1 year ago (10 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Tenants' rights advocates are raising legal concerns about a Toronto building complex that's banning electric transportation vehicles from the property, including in units, the garage, parking spaces and lockers.

Notices were posted this week at 110 and 120 Jameson Avenue in Parkdale, owned by Oberon Development Corporation, to alert tenants to the ban.

The Residential Tenancies Act guarantees a tenant's right to the "reasonable enjoyment" of the premises, Kwan pointed out.

Beyond that, said Kwan, if a person has a disability and relies on an electric vehicle due to mobility restrictions, such a ban could infringe on their human rights.

The devices are also environmentally friendly, said Mason, adding having more Torontonians rely on alternative transportation is helpful to combat climate change.

"This is a great solution for families who live in the buildings because it makes life more affordable by eliminating the cost of private car ownership," said Ian Klesmer, the director of strategy and grants at TAF.


The original article contains 915 words, the summary contains 157 words. Saved 83%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›