this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2023
126 points (97.7% liked)

World News

39023 readers
2480 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] matchphoenix@feddit.uk 47 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Regular maintenance, reinforcements and retrofitting can extend a dam’s safe operation well past 100 years and bring a structure up to current standards, Perera and Shannon say. But many dams don’t receive routine repairs and are not aging gracefully. Just making the recommended fixes to most U.S. dams would cost an estimated $157.5 billion dollars, according to a 2023 report from the Association of State Dam Safety Officials.

So much of today’s news feels like we’re frogs in a pot of boiling water.

[–] Skies5394@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s because infrastructure spending, especially repairs or preventative maintenance, isn’t a vote getter. It’s not flashy, so it doesn’t get the focus it should.

By the time our representatives have funded their pet projects, and their donors projects, they aren’t going to award a large chunk that’s needed for these repairs.

That is.. until there is a catastrophe close to home. Unfortunately that’s when we’ll likely see action. But it’ll be myopic, and focus only on one specific thing, leaving another unattended.

[–] SlikPikker@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Another flaw of "representative" TV personality politics

[–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And how much would all of them breaking cost?

[–] NewNewAccount@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

At least $157.6 billion.

[–] itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

So stop building towns in flood plains.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

People historically commune near flood plains.

Floods are a good thing for soil fertility. Not much else.

Farms often are on land that is likely to see small amounts of flooding regularly.

Farms feed people. People like to be fed.

Also water is pretty crucial.

Just slowly zoom into the Nile river somewhere well south of Egypt, and you'll see there is more or less NOTHING that is not within 10 miles of the river.

[–] netburnr@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

The problem is the massive flooding way past the typical riverbed because of the massive amount of water waiting to be released. If they slowly emptied the lake it would be very different where the water line goes.

A good chunk of the Midwest would be wiped out if the dams along the Missouri failed in sequence. There's a ridiculous amount of water there.