this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2024
243 points (93.2% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35762 readers
1011 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Primer81@lemmy.zip 71 points 1 week ago (1 children)

mildly satisfying and infuriating at the same time!

[–] teft@lemmy.world 69 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

My life IRL

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 41 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Nothing like drinking a hot tea on a stormy afternoon and curling up with a good book of orange!

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

A nice blue book on a hot days is quite refreshing

[–] credo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wait until your mood turns dark.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago (2 children)

"Meh, who 'reads' books? It's pretty!"

Store shelver probably.

[–] Sergio@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"The books are all broken, none of them connect to social media."

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

One of my favorite stories is from 2011:

"A magazine is an iPad that does not work."

https://youtu.be/aXV-yaFmQNk

That baby is now 13, maybe 14 years old.

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago

At least 14, maybe 15 - because it was 1 just a bit over 13 years ago (I'm sure if the baby was nearly 2, it would've been labeled as such)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Cuberoot@lemmynsfw.com 34 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Interior design suppliers let you place orders like "6 feet of purple books."

[–] doublenut@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago

Booksbythefoot

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

One of the last renovation shows I watched just put the books backwards for a "clean look"

[–] valek879@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wait what? Can you even do that? A clean look? What!?

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Most designers are from over function.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dan1101@lemm.ee 22 points 1 week ago

I'm in the mood to read something orange today.

[–] Droggelbecher@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My mum used to do this to my books in my room and I hated it

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 25 points 1 week ago (3 children)

When I was a child, I once knocked every book off every shelf in the house.

Because I had 6 books in alphabetical order on my little shelf in my room. My mother kept rearranging them in as close a rainbow distribution as possible.. I asked her to stop many times, but ultimately decided if you're going to mess up my shelf, I will mess up yours.

Surprisingly this tactic worked, and they didn't make me clean up the books by myself, they did most of it.

Their idea of "organizing" the books is "well most of the books in that series are close to each other, but a bunch of other random ones are mixed in, and entire genres have been rearranged many times so who knows what books we even actually have"

They have a similar way of organizing dvds. It's infuriating.

[–] Droggelbecher@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But do they actually read and watch the books and dvds? Cause my mom doesn't read, so books are just decorations to her

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 7 points 1 week ago

They barely watch dvds anymore since they're spending like 100/mo on various streaming subs.

They've had a book in hand for as long as I can remember, nowadays it's a Kindle but their disorganization has been present as long as I can remember, too.

Last year I watched their dog while they were out of town, and I reorganized their dvd collection in alphabetical order, keeping the various series together.

In less than 6 months it was essentially back to complete chaos. And in that time,according to them, they barely watched any dvds, they just looked through the shelves a bunch to figure out what they have.Why that requires them to pull movies out and out them back in a different spot, I'm not sure.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Direct action > nonviolent protest, got it.

[–] Bruncvik@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I was in a similar situation. It was the only time I got into a serious fight with my mom. The only difference was that I was an adult already, had around 1800 books, and sorted them by genre, author and series order.

[–] jonathan@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I don't understand the logistics of possessing 1800 books. That is so many books. Did you live in a library?

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 4 points 1 week ago

My parents have between 1,000 and 3,000 books.. Even they aren't sure.

Last time they were neatly arranged I was a child.

Right now they have 3 floor-to-ceiling bookshelves stacked as densely as possible, 3 books deep, with as many stacked In and laying on top as can fit Ina rectangle 10ft tall, 4ft wide, and 18ish inches deep.

Plus a handful of waist high shelves, multiple moving boxes filled up that haven't been emptied since they moved in2017 and a ton scattered all over the house..

They have more fantasy/Sci fi books than every library in a 50 mile radius combined.

I still have less than 30 books to my name since most of mine are digital, but I've been going to half price books looking to get physical copies of everything.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk 16 points 1 week ago

I did this to all my parents' bookshelves when I was about 8. For the next 45 years they blamed me every time they couldn't find a book.

[–] insaneinthemembrane@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (3 children)

What's an Op Shop?

It looks like a charity shop that I would see around here. They also organise clothes by colour which makes more sense but still, I'm only looking for my size and in a charity shop the clothes are all random so availability is more important.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's apparently what they call a thrift store in Australia and New Zealand. They sell used goods for charity.

[–] Jimbo@yiffit.net 8 points 1 week ago

An Op Shop is Australasian slang for a thrift store/charity shop. Not to be confused with Opshop, a New Zealand rock band formed in 2002.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

This is a far more rational order than the chaos that is our bookshelves:

And that is after significant weeding.

We did try with the paperbacks, but we decided "fuck it" after a while.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago

I might be weird, but I like the look of a full but chaotic bookshelf.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Putting the wooden doll up one shelf with the other humanoid figures would be a good start.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

It took me a while to figure out what you were talking about. That's not even supposed to be there. That's my daughter's. I have no idea why she decided to put it there apart from the aforementioned "fuck it."

[–] 8000gnat@reddthat.com 12 points 1 week ago

i love it. searching through old books at a resale shop is a great setting for randomness to explore

[–] eunieisthebus@feddit.org 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think that is mildly satisfying. To be fair: I haven't seen a single book shop sorting the books alphabetical. A book shop isn't a library.

[–] kattfisk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I've never seen a place selling books not have them organized alphabetically! They might not be libraries but they have an interest in their customers being able to find what they're looking for

[–] uhmbah@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sorted by genre, then alphabetically.

[–] kattfisk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 3 points 1 week ago

A book shop isn't a library.

I don't get what you mean by this. Customers can go into both looking for something specific or seek out a particular author. If there's no logical ordering how can customers find what they're looking for?

[–] EveningPancakes@lemm.ee 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My wife does this to our books and it drives me nuts.

  • "Where's The Art of War?"
  • "It's in the black section"

One year her mom and I reordered them by author last name while she was away on a work trip. Took her 5 seconds upon returning home to notice it was different and she was furious.

[–] SmokyOrange@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Put yourself in her shoes. If she derives joy from a colorful sorting of the books, it's likely any other sorting would cause some annoyance/anguish (however minor). She would feel this way each time she laid eyes on the bookshelf.

On the other hand, a colorful sorting would only negatively affect you when you are actively looking for a book. I'm guessing that's far less often than she merely looks at the bookshelf.

A compromise could be that she sorts the books by color and then by authors name. Not the most efficient sorting method for finding books, but would save a considerable amount of time compared to no author name sorting at all.

Edit: alternatively, a quick Google image search of the book name would tell you all you need to know to quickly find it in a colorful sorting.

[–] PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Or book jackets. That's what I'd do. Gives an opportunity for creative outlet, too!

[–] GaMEChld@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

This is the smartest solution. Order and aesthetics simultaneously!

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

it's ridiculous and insane.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ixoid@lemm.ee 8 points 1 week ago

"I'd like to buy a book, please" "What are you interested in?" "A blue one!"

[–] b3an@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Maybe they’ll further alphabetize it after sorting by color… hahah right. What a mess

[–] Sergio@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

First color, then size, THEN alphabetical.

[–] b3an@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ah there is a logic within the madness. Does this make me mad too, or was I crazy to begin with. He cries because he does not know.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pseudo@jlai.lu 4 points 1 week ago

Finally! Something mildly infuriating!

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 4 points 1 week ago

Could it be... Aesthetics?

load more comments
view more: next ›