Unique ability as a practical problem-solver
Lmao
this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2024
48 points (96.2% liked)
News
23664 readers
3819 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
You must admit that his approaches to solving problems are unique.
Practical, not so much.
Easy solution for folks wanting to be in Idaho. Move there.
Please do not let these monsters spread.
So much for states' rights...
Cascadia now!
That would require the majority of voters in both states agree. Not likely to happen.
The counties wanting to split off weren't anywhere near unanimous, and in total they represent about 150k population, give or take, so deffo no chance in Oregon considering voters in Portland go hard blue (ironically why the movement exists lol). A pass in federal congress is also needed and also not likely.
Eh, I wouldn't count on either of these being STRICTLY NECESSARY. Trump and his cronies have shown considerable willingness to simply bypass restrictions and do things that are blatantly illegal or "don't work that way", and it would not surprise me if he's willing to play ball with white nationalists and rearranges state lines via executive order.
That's not even a amendments thing, it's a baseline constitution thing.
Per Article IV, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution:
New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new States shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State; nor any State be formed by the Junction of two or more States, or parts of States, without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of the Congress.
I suppose one could make an argument about it not being a new state formed by the junction/parts of two or more states, just giving one to another, but I doubt even our current SCOTUS would go for that interpretation, as it's wildly farfetched.
Trump himself, and several of his Cabinet, have stated they believe they are a "post-Constitution" administration. I fully believe this means that they intend to ignore constitutionality, and I don't have a doubt in my mind that his backers in Congress and on the Supreme Court will support him doing so.
This is effectively him channeling his favorite president, Andrew Jackson: "the court has made their decision [that what I did was illegal], now let them enforce it." Without anyone willing to enforce consequences, real consequences, not a lot will stop them from simply ignoring the Constitution.
They feel as disenfranchised as Texas Democrats. Must be frustrating.
California could annex eastern Oregon